Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T22:24:12.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Analysis of farmers' Policy Attitudes and Preferences for Free Trade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Terry L. Kastens  and
Barry K. Goodwin
Terry L. Kastens
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University
Barry K. Goodwin
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study evaluates the attitudes of U.S. (Kansas) farmers regarding “free-trade” and “free-market” policy environments. In contrast to earlier studies, non-specific policy attitudes are evaluated. A direct measure of farm program benefits is also included. Attitudes vary significantly with farm and operator characteristics. Support for free trade was shown to decrease with education and experience, to increase for farms with relatively more rented land, and to increase as total farm wealth increased. Support for free-trade was also higher for crop farms. Farms receiving more government payments are less likely to favor a free-trade policy environment.

Keywords

agricultural policyproducer attitudesinternational trade
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , December 1994 , pp. 497 - 505
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amemiya, T. “Qualitative Response Models: A Survey.” J. Econ. Literature 19(1981):1483–1536.Google Scholar
Barkley, A.P., Flinchbaugh, B.L.. “Farm Operator Opinion and Agricultural Policy; Kansas Survey Results.” North Cen. J. Agr. Econ. 12(1990): 223–239.Google Scholar
Barlett, P. F.American Dreams. Rural Realities: Family Farms in Crisis. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Edelman, M.A. and Lasley, P.. “An Analysis of the Agricultural and Trade Policy Preferences of Iowa Farm Operators.” North Cen. J. Agr. Econ. 10(1988): 243–254.Google Scholar
Featherstone, A.M., Griebel, J. C., and Langemeier, L. N.. “A Comparison of the Farm Management Association Data to the USDA Farm Cost and Return Survey Data.” Farm Management Association Newsletter, Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, April 1992.Google Scholar
Greene, W. H.Econometric Analysis. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co., 1990.Google Scholar
Kansas Agricultural Statistics. Kansas Agricultural Statistics 1991. Kansas State Board of Agriculture, Topeka, Kansas, 1992.Google Scholar
Orazem, P.F., Otto, D.M., and Edelman, M.A.. “An Analysis of farmers' Agricultural Policy Preferences.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 71(1989):837–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. 1987 Agricultural Census, Kansas. Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Variyam, J. N., Jordan, J. L., and Epperson, J. E.. “Preferences of Citizens for Agricultural Policies: Evidence from a National Survey.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 72(1990):257–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar