Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T10:17:28.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Empirical Analysis of Louisiana Small Farmers’ Involvement in the Conservation Reserve Program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Patricia E. McLean-Meyinsse ,
Jianguo Hui  and
Randolph Joseph Jr.
Patricia E. McLean-Meyinsse
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Southern University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Jianguo Hui
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Southern University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Randolph Joseph Jr.
Affiliation:
USDA-Soil Conservation Service, Alexandria, Louisiana
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The study examines Louisiana small farmers' reasons for not participating in the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), their awareness of the program, and their willingness to participate in the program. The results suggest that: farmers do not participate in the CRP if revenues from cropland are an important source of income, or if they are tenants; awareness is significantly related to education, income, race, and average return per acre; willingness is positively influenced by payment per acre, age, and farm status. Participation depends on whether payments per acre are comparable to the opportunity costs of removing cropland from production.

Keywords

binomial and multinomial logit modelsconservation reserve programnonparticipationsmall farmerssocioeconomic characteristics
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , December 1994 , pp. 379 - 385
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbarika, A. and LangLey, J.. “Budgetary and Farm-Sector Impacts of the 1985-1990 Conservation Reserve Program.” J. Soil and Water Consent. 47(1992): 264–267.Google Scholar
Chambers, R. G. and Foster, W. E.. “Participation in Farmer-Owned Reserve Program: A Discrete Choice Model.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 65(1983): 120–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicks, M. R., Riely, P. L., and Shagam, S. D.. “The Effects of Commodity Program Participation on Bidding in The Conservation Reserve Program.” Northeast J. Agr. Resource Econ. 16(1987): 144–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esseks, J. D. and Kraft, S. E.. “Why Eligible Landowners Did Not Participate in the Conservation Reserve Program.” J. Soil and Water Conserv. 43(1988): 251–256.Google Scholar
Esseks, J. D. and Kraft, S. E.. “Marketing the Conservation Reserve Program.” J. Soil and Water Conserv. 44(1989): 425–430.Google Scholar
Gillespie, J. M., Hatch, L. U., and Duffy, P. A.. “Effect of the 1985 Farm Bill Provisions on farmers' Soil Conservation Decisions.” S. J. Agr. Econ. 22(1990): 179–189.Google Scholar
Greene, W. H.Econometric Analysis. Macmillan Publishing Company: New York. (1993): 635–681.Google Scholar
Heimlich, R. E. and Osborn, C. T.. “The Conservation Reserve Program: What Happens When Contracts Expire?” CHOICES. Third Quarter, (1993): 9–14.Google Scholar
Hertel, T. W. and Preckel, P. V.. “Commodity-Specific Effects of the Conservation Reserve Program.” J. Agr. Econ. Res. 40(1988): 2–11.Google Scholar
Joseph, R. Jr.An Examination of Small-Scale farmers' Participation in the Conservation Program in Northeast Louisiana. Unpublished Master's thesis, Southern University, 1990.Google Scholar
Konyar, K. and Osborn, C. T.. “A National-Level Economic Analysis of Conservation Reserve Program Participation: A Discrete Choice Approach.” J. Agr. Econ. Res. 42(1990): 5–12.Google Scholar
Maddala, G. S.Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge University Press: New York. 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, M., Radtke, H., Eleveld, B., and Nofziger, S. D.. “The Impacts of the Conservation Reserve Program on Rural Communities.” W. J. Agr. Econ. 13(1988): 225–232.Google Scholar
Perry, G. M., McCarl, B. A., Rister, M. E., and Richardson, J. W.. “Modeling Government Program Participation at the Farm Level.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 71(1989): 1011–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichelderfer, K. and Boggess, W. G.. “Government Decision Making and Program Performance: the Case of the Conservation Reserve Program.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 70(1988): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, R. A.A Model of Participation in U.S. Farm Program. ERS, USDA. Technical Bulletin, No. 1819. August 1993.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. R. and Smith, H. A.. “Aggregate Economic Effects of CRP Land Returning to Production.” Agricultural and Resource Policy Forum. College of Agriculture, Auburn University. Vol. 4 No. 1. May 1993.Google Scholar
U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Office of Advocacy and Enterprise. Department Regulations, No. 1020 (1990).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. 1987 Census of Agriculture. Part 18, Vol. 1. Louisiana State and County Data. July 1989.Google Scholar