Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T19:20:19.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Coasian Approach to Efficient Water Allocation of a Transboundary River

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

David B. Willis  and
Justin S. Baker
David B. Willis
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Economics and Statistics, Clemson University, College Station, TX
Justin S. Baker
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The United States and Mexico recently resolved a decade-old water dispute that required Mexico to repay the accumulated water debt within one year. A Coasian analysis estimates the social welfare gains attainable to each country under an alternative debt repayment scheme that allows repayment over a longer time horizon and in a combination of dollars and water, instead of solely in water. Assuming average water supply conditions, under the agreed 1-year repayment contract, U.S. compensation value is 534% greater and Mexico's compensation cost is 60% less relative to when compensation is paid exclusively in water.

Keywords

coasewater allocationwater compensationwater marketsQ1Q2
Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , August 2008 , pp. 473 - 484
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adcock, F., Hobbs, A., and Rosson, C.. “The U.S./Mexico Water Dispute: Impacts of Increased Irrigation in Chihuahua, Mexico.” Center for North American Studies, Texas A&M University, 2003.Google Scholar
Baker, J. “Transboundary Water Resource Management and Conflict Resolution: A Coasian Strategic Negotiations Approach.” Unpublished M.S. thesis. Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Texas Tech University, December 2005.Google Scholar
Brandes, R.J. “Evaluation of Amistad-Falcon Water Supply Under Current and Extended Drought Conditions: Phase II: Lower Rio Grande Valley Regional Integrated Water Resources Planning Study.” Austin, TX: R.J. Brandes, 1999.Google Scholar
Coase, R. “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics 3(October 1960):1–44.Google Scholar
Combs, S. “The Mexico Water Debt.” Texas Bar Journal 67,3(2003):198–201.Google Scholar
Puente-Gonzalez, A. “Water Economics in the Rio Conchos River, Chihuahua Irrigation Districts, 1990–2001.” Washington, DC: World Wildlife Fund, 2002.Google Scholar
Puente-Gonzalez, A. “Towards Sustainable Use of Water in Agriculture: Assessment of an Investment Project for Irrigation District 005 Delicias/Chihuahua.” Washington, DC: World Wildlife Fund, 2003.Google Scholar
Rakestraw, K. International Boundaries and Water Commission. Personal communication. July 2005.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. “Alternative Approaches to Estimating the Impact of Irrigation Water Shortages on Rio Grande Valley Agriculture.” College Station, TX: Texas Water Resources Institute, 2002.Google Scholar
Utilization of Waters of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande: Treaty Between the United States of America and Mexico, Internet site: www.ibwc.state.gov/Files/1944Treaty.pdf (Accessed June 2, 2008).Google Scholar