Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-4thr5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T08:29:18.745Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamic Factor Demands for Aggregate Southeastern United States Agriculture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Timothy G. Taylor  and
Michael J. Monson
Timothy G. Taylor
Affiliation:
Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida
Michael J. Monson
Affiliation:
Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A four equation input demand system for aggregate Southeastern United States agriculture consistent with dynamic optimizing behavior is specified and estimated. Labor and materials are considered as variable inputs while land and capital are treated as quasi-fixed inputs. It is found that the adjustment rates for capital and land differ considerably and are interdependent. Further, the data appear consistent with the existence of an aggregate production technology and the hypothesized optimizing behavior.

Keywords

dynamic dualityfactor demandsquasi-fixed inputs
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , December 1985 , pp. 1 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antle, J. M. “Structure of Agricultural Technology.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 66(1984):414–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Askari, H. and Cummings, J. T.. “Estimating Agricultural Supply Response with the Nerlove Model: A Survey.” Inter. Econ. Rev., 18(1977):257–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berndt, E. K., Fuss, M., and Waverman, L.. “A Dynamic Model of Cost of Adjustment and Interrelated Factor Demands.” Working Paper 7925, Institute for Policy Analysis, University of Toronto, 1979.Google Scholar
Berndt, E. K., Hall, B. H., Hall, R. E., and Hausman, J. A.. “Estimation and Inference in Nonlinear Structural Models.” Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 3(1974):653–665.Google Scholar
Berndt, E. K., Morrison-White, C. J., and Watkins, G. C.. “Energy Substitution and Capital Utilization in a Dynamic Context.” National Science Foundation Conference paper, 1979.Google Scholar
Chambers, R., and Vasavada, U.. “Investment in Land and Capital in U.S. Agriculture: A Dynamic Empirical Model.” American Agricultural Economics Association selected paper, 1983.Google Scholar
Denny, M., Fuss, M., and Waverman, L.. “The Substitution Possibilities for Energy: Evidence from U.S. and Canadian Manufacturing Industries.”National Science Foundation Conference paper, 1979.Google Scholar
Diewert, W. E. “Exact and Superlative Index Numbers.” J. Econometrics, 4(1976):115–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, L. G. “Duality Theory and Functional Forms for Dynamic Factor Demands.” Rev. Econ. Studies, 48(1981):81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, L. G. and Denny, M.. “The Multivariate Flexible Accelerator Model: Its Empirical Restrictions and an Application to U.S. Manufacturing.” Econometrica, 51 (1983):647–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallant, A. R. and Jorgenson, D. W.. “Statistical Inference for a System of Simultaneous, Nonlinear, Implicit Equations in the Context of Instrumental Variable Estimation.” J. Econometrics, 11 (1979):275–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, J. A. “An Instrumental Variable Approach to Full Information Estimators for Linear and Certain Nonlinear Econometric Models.” Econometrica, 43(1975):727–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, R. E. “Optimal Investment Policy and the Flexible Accelerator.” Inter. Econ. Rev., 8(1967):78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, K. R. and Cooper, R. J.. “Intertemporal Duality: Application to the Theory of the Firm.” Econometrica, 48(1980):1755–1762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortensen, D. T. “Generalized Costs of Adjustment and Dynamic Factor Demand Theory.” Econometrica, 42(1973):657–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadiri, M. I. and Rosen, S.. “Interrelated Factor Demand Functions.” Amer. Econ. Rev., 59(1969):457–471.Google Scholar
Treadway, A. “On Rational Entrepreneurial Behavior and the Demand for Investment.” Rev. Econ. Studies, 36(1969):227–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treadway, A. “The Globally Optimal Flexible Accelerator.” J. Econ. Theory, 7(1974):17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USDA. “Economic Indicators of the Farm Sector: Production and Efficiency Statistics, 1982.” National Economics Division, Economics and Statistics Service, 1984.Google Scholar
USDA. “Economic Indicators of the Farm Sector: State Income and Balance Sheet Statistics, 1982.” National Economics Division, Economics and Statistics Service, 1984.Google Scholar