Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T23:18:12.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Economic Homogeneity of Grade Classifications Under the New and Old Feeder Cattle Grading Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

James N. Trapp*
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State University

Extract

In 1979, the USDA implemented a new feeder cattle grading system that is distinctly different from the old, both in concept and terminology. Under the old grading system, the traditional grade categories of Prime, Choice, Good, and so on were used. Animals were graded according to their ability to satisfy a number of qualitative characteristics. The new system is based upon a dual criterion of framesize and muscling. Cattle are graded as either having large, medium, or small framesizes and No. 1, No. 2, or No. 3 muscling (thickness).

Casual observation of the two grading systems indicates that cattle graded as Choice under the old system will in most cases be classified as Medium Frame, No. 1 Muscled cattle under the new system. Likewise, cattle previously graded as Good will in most cases likely be graded as Medium Frame, No. 2 Muscled animals.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Nelson, Kenneth E. Personal communication of preliminary survey results. ESCS, USDA. Dept. of Agr. Econ., University of Illinois, Urbana.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service. “Livestock Detailed Quotations (Weekly), Oklahoma City Market.” Livestock, Poultry, Grain and Seed Division, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service. “Livestock: Grades and Standards for Feeder Cattle.” Federal Register, Washington, D.C., August 1, 1979, 45319-22.Google Scholar