Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T07:48:37.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Impacts of State Parks on State Economies in the South

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2016

John C. Bergstrom ,
H. Ken Cordell ,
Alan E. Watson  and
Gregory A. Ashley
John C. Bergstrom
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Georgia
H. Ken Cordell
Affiliation:
Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, U.S. Forest Service
Alan E. Watson
Affiliation:
Intermountain Research Station, U. S. Forest Service
Gregory A. Ashley
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Georgia, Athens
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The economic impacts of recreational visits to state parks on the economies of North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Tennessee were estimated using the U.S. Forest Service IMPLAN input-output modeling system. Recreational expenditure data associated with state parks were obtained from the Public Area Recreation Visitors Study (PARVS). Results suggest that recreational spending may stimulate a considerable amount of economic activity in the state economies studied. Hence, future research into the economic development potential of outdoor recreation seems warranted.

Keywords

outdoor recreationparkstrip expendituresregional economic impacts
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , December 1990 , pp. 69 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alward, G.S. “Extending the IMPLAN I/O System: The Social Accounting Matrix”. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Forest Economists Assn., Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 1985.Google Scholar
Alward, G.S. and Lofting, E.M.. “Opportunities for Analyzing the Economic Impacts of Recreation and Tourism Expenditures Using IMPLAN”. Paper contributed to the annual meeting of the Regional Science Association. Philadelphia, PA, 1985.Google Scholar
Alward, G.S. and Palmer, C.J.. “IMPLAN: An Input-Output Analysis system for Forest Service Planning”. Forest Sector Models: Proceedings of the First North American Conference. Williamsburg, Virginia: AB Academic Publishing, Oxford, 1983.Google Scholar
Alward, G.S. Davis, H.G., Despotakis, K.A., and Lofting, E.M.. “Regional Non-Survey Input-Output Analysis with IMPLAN. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Regional Science Association. Washington D., 1985.Google Scholar
Cordell, H.K.. Bergstrom, J.C., Hartmann, L.A., and English, D.B.K.., An Analysis of the Outdoor Recreation and Wilderness Situation in the United States: 1989-2040. General Technical Report RM-189, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, U.S. Forest Service, Ft. Collins, CO, 1990.Google Scholar
Cordell, H.K. Hartmann, L.A., Watson, A.E., Fritschen, J., Propst, D.B., and Siverts, E.L.. “The Background and Status of an Interagency Research Effort: The PARVS”. Southeastern Recreation Research Conference, Cordell, B.M., ed. Asheville, NC, 1987.Google Scholar
Hotvedt, J.E., Busby, R.L., and Jacob, R.E.. “Use of IMPLAN for Regional Input-Output Studies”. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Forest Economics Assn. Buena Vista, FL, 1988.Google Scholar
Libby, L.W. “Public Recreation on Private Land: Research Needs and Considerations”. Research Issues Related to Recreational Access, Grafton, W.N. and Ferrise, A., eds. No, R.D.. 747, West Virginia University Extension Service, Morgantown, WV, 1990.Google Scholar
Martin, M. Radtke, H., Eleveld, B., and Nofziger, S.D.. “The Impacts of the Conservation Reserve Program on Rural Communities: The Case of Three Oregon Counties”. West. J. Agr. Econ. 13 (1988):225–232.Google Scholar
Miernyk, W.H. The Elements of Input-Output Analysis. New York: Random House, 1965.Google Scholar
Palmer, CJ., and Siverts, E.L.. IMPLAN Analysis Guide. Land Management Planning Systems Section, U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Ft. Collins, CO, 1985.Google Scholar
Propst, D.B. “Use of IMPLAN with the Public Area Recreation Visitor Survey (PARVS) Pretest Data: Findings and Recommendations”. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Park and Recreation Resources, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 1985.Google Scholar
Propst, D.B. Gavrilis, D.B., Cordell, H.K., and Hansen, W.J.. “Assessing the Secondary Economic Impacts of Recreation and Tourism: Work Team Recommendations”. In Propst, D.B.(compiler), Assessing the Economic Impact of Recreation and Tourism: Conference and Workshop. Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, NC, 1985.Google Scholar
Radtke, H. Detering, S., and Brokken, R.. “A Comparison of Economic Impact Estimates for Changes in the Federal Grazing Fee: Secondary vs. Primary Data Input/Output Models”. West. J. Agr. Econ. 10 (1985):382–390.Google Scholar
Richardson, H.W. Input-Output and Regional Economics. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1972.Google Scholar
Schaffer, W.A.ed. On the Use of Input-Output Models for Regional Planning. Leiden, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Social Sciences Division, 1976.Google Scholar
Siverts, E.L. “Analytical Opportunities Using IMPLAN”. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Forest Economists Assn. Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 1985.Google Scholar
Walsh, R.G. Recreation Economic Decisions: Comparing Benefits and Costs. State College, Pennsylvania: Venture Publishing, Inc., 1986.Google Scholar
Watson, A.E. and Bratcher, L.. Public Area Recreation Visitor Study: Phase III Reporting. Final Cooperative Research Agreement Report to the Outdoor Recreation and Wilderness Assessment Research Unit, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Athens, GA, 1987.Google Scholar