Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T01:17:17.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effectiveness of Use-value Assessment in Preserving Farmland: A Search-theoretic Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Edmund M. Tavernier  and
Farong Li
Edmund M. Tavernier
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Marketing, Rutgers University
Farong Li
Affiliation:
Johnson and Johnson, Health Care Systems Inc., New Brunswick, New Jersey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Search theory is used to present a theoretically defensible model to examine the effectiveness of use value assessment (UVA) in preserving farmland. The model is empirically tractable and supports the findings of past research. The analysis considers the impact of farm income, uncertainty, and the distribution of the offer price on the effectiveness of UVA in preserving farmland and shows, through the effect on the reservation price, that for a given distribution of the offer price, property-tax rate, and the difference between market-value and use-value of land, the preservation of agricultural land only takes place within a relevant range.

Keywords

farmland preservationoffer pricereservation pricesearch theoryuncertaintyuse-value assessment
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , December 1995 , pp. 626 - 635
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J.E. “Use-value Property Tax Assessment: Effect on Land Development”, Land Economics 69(1993):263–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaton, W.P. “The Impact of Regional Land-use Controls on Property Values: The Case of the New Jersey Pinelands,” Land Economics 67(1991):172–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellman, R.Dynamic Programming, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1957.Google ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, J.T. “Evaluation the Effectiveness of Use-value Programs.” Property Tax Journal, 7(1988):157–165.Google Scholar
Fuller, A.M. and Mage, J.A., Part-time farming, Proceedings of the First Rural Geography Symposium, Ontario: University of Guelph, 1975.Google Scholar
Kim, S. “Search, Hedonic Prices and Housing Demand,” The Review of Economics and Statistics 74(1992):503–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, D.A. and Sinden, J.A.. “Price Formation in Farmland Market,” Land Economics 70(1994):38–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippman, S.A. and McCall, J.J.. “The Economics of Job Search: A Survey,” Economic Inquiry 14(1976):347–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, R.A., Adelaja, A.O., and Andrews, M. S.. “The Effects of Suburbanization on Agriculture,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70(1988):346–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, J.J. “Economics of Information and Job Search,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 84(1970):113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, A.C. “Preserving Prime Farmland in the Face of Urbanization,” Journal of the American Planning Association 58(1992):477–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, A.C.. “Economic Critique of Prime Farmland Preservation Policies in the United States,” Journal of Rural Studies 6(1990):114–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New Jersey Department of Agriculture. New Jersey Agricultural Statistics 1992, Trenton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Rose, L.A. “The Development Value Tax,” Urban Studies 10(1973):271–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, M. and Stiglitz, J.. “Increasing Risk I: A Definition,” Journal of Economic Theory 2(1970):225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sargent, T.J.Dynamic Macroeconomic Theory, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Stigler, G.J., “The Economics of Information,” Journal of Political Economics 69(1961):213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavernier, E.M. and Li, F.Information and the Formation of the Offer Price in the Farmland Market, Mimeo, Dept. of Agricultural Economics and Marketing, Cook College, Rutgers University, 1994.Google Scholar