Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T02:14:08.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluating Privately Funded Public Research: An Example With Poultry And Eggs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Stephen Martinez  and
George W. Norton
Stephen Martinez
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University
George W. Norton
Affiliation:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A procedure is described for evaluating poultry and egg research projects. A peer review questionnaire and benefit-cost analysis are utilized incorporating elasticities from an econometric model for poultry and eggs. Production, cost, and price changes are used to calculate changes in producer surplus and net economic surplus for a set of privately funded publicly conducted research projects.

Keywords

poultryresearch evaluationeconomic surplusbenefit-cost analysis
Type
Submitted Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , July 1986 , pp. 129 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bredahl, M. and Peterson, W.. “The Productivity and Allocation of Research: U.S. Agricultural Experiment Stations.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 58,4(1976):684–692.Google Scholar
Chavas, J. P., Hassan, Z. A., and Johnson, S. R.. “Static and Dynamic Elasticities and Flexibilities in System of Simultaneous Equations.“ J. Agr. Econ., 32(1981):177–187.Google Scholar
Chavas, J. P. and Johnson, S. R.. “An Econometric Model of The U.S. Egg Industry.” Applied Econ., 13(1981):321–335.Google Scholar
Chavas, J. P. and Johnson, S. R.. “Supply Dynamics: The Case of U.S. Broilers and Turkeys.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 64,3(1982):558–564.Google Scholar
Chipman, J. S. and Moore, J. C.. “Compensating Variation, Consumer Surplus, and Welfare.” Amer. Econ. Rev., 70(1980): 933–949 Google Scholar
Council of Economic Advisors. Economic Indicators, various issues.Google Scholar
Currie, J. S., Murphy, J. A., and A. Schmitz. “The Concept of Economic Surplus and its Use in Economic Analysis.” The Econ. J., 81(1971):741–798.Google Scholar
Evenson, R. E., Ruttan, V. W., and P. E. Waggoner. “Economic Benefits From Research: An Example from Agriculture.” Science, 205(1979): 1,101–1,107.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). FAO Production Yearbook, various issues.Google Scholar
Hause, J. C. “The Theory of Welfare Cost Measurement.“ J. Pol. Economy, 83(1975): 1,145–1,182.Google Scholar
Heien, D. “An Economic Analysis of the U.S. Poultry Sector” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 58,3(1976):311–316.Google Scholar
Just, R. C, Hueth, D., and Schmitz, A.. Applied Welfare Analysis. Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1982.Google Scholar
Lindner, R. K. and Jarrett, F. G.. “Supply Shifts and the Size of Research Benefits.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 60,1(1978):48–56.Google Scholar
Malone, G. W. and Reece, J.. “Estimating Broiler Supply and Demand as a Simultaneous System.” Poultry Sci., 55(1976):414–418.Google Scholar
Martinez, S. W. Procedure for Evaluating Poultry and Egg Research Projects, M.S. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1984.Google Scholar
McKenzie, G. W. and Pearce, I. F.. “Welfare Measurement - A Synthesis.” Amer. Econ. Rev., 72(1982):669–682.Google Scholar
Norton, G. W. and Davis, J. S.. “Evaluating Returns to Agricultural Research: A Review.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 63,4(1981):685–699.Google Scholar
Office of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Main Economic Indicators, various issues.Google Scholar
Peterson, W. “Returns to Poultry Research in the United States.” J. Farm Econ., 49(1967): 656–669.Google Scholar
Pinstrup-Anderson, P., Londono, N. Ruiz de, and Hoover, E.. “The Impact of Increasing Food Supply on Human Nutrition: Implications for Commodity Priorities in Agricultural Research and Policy.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 58,1(1976):131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pridicasts, Inc. World Product Casts, various issues.Google Scholar
Rose, F. “Supply Shifts and the Size of Research Benefits Comment.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 62,4(1980):834–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, S. K. and Johnson, P. N.. “Econometric Models for Quarterly Shell Egg Prices.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 55,2(1973): 209–213.Google Scholar
Ruttan, V. W. Agricultural Research Policy, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis 1982.Google Scholar
Smith, B. L., Norton, G. W., and Havlicek, J. Jr.. “Impacts of Public Research Expenditures on Agricultural Value-Added in the U.S. and the Northeast.“ J. Northeastern Agr. Econ. Council, (Fall 1983):109–114.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. G., Sprott, J. M., and Callen, R. W.. “Demand, Supply, and Price Relationships for the Broiler Sector with Emphasis on the Jack-Knife Method.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 54,2(1972):245–248.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, Economics Research Service (a). Agricultural Outlook. Washington, D. C, various issues.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, Economics Research Service(b). Livestock and Meat Situation. Washington, D. C, various issues.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, Economics Research Service(c). Livestock and Poultry Situation. Washington, D. C, various issues.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, Economics Research Service(d). Poultry and Egg Situation. Washington, D. C, various issues.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, Economics Research Service(e). Poultry and Egg Statistics. Washington, D. C, various issues.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, Economics Research Service(f). Working Data for Demand Analysis. Washington, D. C, various issues.Google Scholar
United States Department of Commerce. Survey of Current Business. Washington, D. C, various issues.Google Scholar
Willig, R. D. “Consumer Surplus Without Apology.” Amer. Econ. Rev. 66(September 1976):589–597.Google Scholar