No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Interregional and Interseasonal Competition in the U. S. Beef Industry: An Application of Reactive Programming*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 April 2015
Extract
Interregional and interseasonal competition in the U.S. beef industry have been studied extensively during the past decade. Linear programming, quadratic programming, simulation, and various other econometric models have formed the analytical frameworks in these studies.
Reactive programming was first introduced as a useful tool in analyzing interregional competition problems by Tramel and Seale in 1959. Since that time, it has been utilized on a limited basis in spatial analyses in general, and the beef sector in particular. Goodwin used reactive programming in analyzing feeder cattle distribution patterns in the Southwest. In 1972, King and Ho reported a revised reactive programming algorithm and three illustrations of its applicability.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1973
Footnotes
*
Oregon State Experiment Station Technical Paper No. 3649
References
[1]Bhagia, G. S., “An Economic Analysis of Cattle Feeding and Interregional Flows of Live and Carcass Beef.” Ph.D. thesis dissertation, Oregon State University, 1971. 164 numbered leaves.Google Scholar
[2]Bhagia, G. S. and Youde, J. G., An Economic Analysis of the United States Fed Beef Industry, Oregon State Agr. Exp. Stat. Special Report 342, Oct. 1972.Google Scholar
[3]Boles, P. P., “The Role of Railroads in Handling Farm Products,” U. S. Dept. of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Marketing and Transportation Situation 180, Washington, 1971. p. 16–24.Google Scholar
[4]Capener, W. N., et. al., Transportation of Cattle in the West, Wyoming Agricultural Experiment Station Research Journal 25, 1969.Google Scholar
[5]Dietrich, R. A., Market Structure Changes in the Livestock and Meat Industry, With Special Reference to Texas and Oklahoma, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Department of Agricultural Economics and Sociology, Departmental Information Report No. 66-10, College Station, 1966.Google Scholar
[6]Goodwin, J. D., Optimum Distribution Patterns of Feeder Cattle from the Southeast, Southern Cooperative Series, Bulletin No. 101, 1965.Google Scholar
[7]Havlicek, J., Rizek, R. L., and Judge, G. G., Spatial Structure of the Livestock Economy. II. Spatial Analyses of the Flows of Slaughter Livestock in 1955 and 1960. South Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station, North Central Regional Research Bulletin No. 159, Brookings, 1964.Google Scholar
[8]King, Richard A. and Ho, Foo-Shiung, Reactive Programming: A Market Simulating Spatial Equilibrium Algorithm, Economics Research Report No. 21, Department of Agricultural Economics, North Carolina State University, April 1972.Google Scholar
[9]Langemeier, L. and Thompson, R. G., “Demand, Supply, and Price Relationships for the Beef Sector, Post World War II Period,” Journal of Farm Economics 49(1): 169–183. Feb. 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Langemeier, L. and Finley, R. M., “Effects of Split-Demand and Slaughter-Capacity Assumptions on Optimal Locations of Cattle Feeding,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 53(2): 228–234. May 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Pendse, D. C., “Interregional and Interseasonal Competition in the U.S. Beef Industry, 1967–An Integrated Analysis.” PhD. thesis, Oregon State University, 1972. 186 numbered leaves.Google Scholar
[12]Tramel, Thomas E. and Seale, A. D. Jr., “Reactive Programming of Supply and Demand Relations–Application to Fresh Vegetables,” Journal of Farm Economics, Vol. 41, No. 5, Dec. 1959, pp. 1012–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Livestock and Meat Statistics, Supplement for 1968 to Statistical Bulletin No. 333. Washington, D.C., July 1969.Google Scholar
[14]United States Department of Agriculture, Marketing and Transportation Situation - 167. Washington, D.C., 1967. 35 p.Google Scholar