Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-10T07:15:10.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Logit Model of Farmers' Decisions About Credit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Faqir Singh Bagi
Faqir Singh Bagi*
Affiliation:
Department of Rural Development, Tennessee State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Most of the research in agricultural credit in the United States is related to large-scale commercial farming. A number of such studies have tried to estimate the demand for credit (Hesser and Schuh) and/or supply of credit (Melichar).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , December 1983 , pp. 13 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amemiya, Takeshi. “Qualitative Response Models: A Survey.” J. Econ. Lit. 19(1981): 1483—1536.Google Scholar
Berkson, J. “Why I Prefer Logits to Probits.” Biometrics 7(1951):327–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehlje, Michael. “The Entry-Growth Exit Process in Agriculture.” S. J. Agr. Econ. 5(1973):23–36.Google Scholar
Brake, J. R. “Farm Finance and National Economic Policy—Some Gaps in Knowledge.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 56(1979): 1056–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, E. A., and Cox, D. R.. “Discrimination Between Alternative Binary Response Models.” Biometrica 54(1967):573–578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farris, J. E., and Armstrong, D. L.. Economics Associated with Size: Kern County Cash Crop Farms. Giannini Foundation Research Rpt. No. 269, University of California, 1963.Google Scholar
Hall, B. F., and LeVeen, E. P.. “Farm Size and Economic Efficiency: The Case of California.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 60(1978):589–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, J. J. “The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection, and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator of Such Models.” Ann. Econ. Soc. Measurement 5(1976):475–492.Google Scholar
Hesser, L. E., and Schuh, G. E.. “The Demand for Agricultural Mortgage Credit.” J. FarmEcon. 44(1962): 1583–1588.Google Scholar
Huffman, W. E. “Black-White Human Capital Differences: Impact on Agricultural Productivity in the U. S. South.” Amer. Econ. Rev. 71(1981):94–107.Google Scholar
McManus, B. R.Farm Credit Use in West and Middle Tennessee. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. No. 441, University of Tennessee, 1966.Google Scholar
Melicher, Emanual. “Financing Agriculture: Demand for and Supply of Farm Capital and Credit.” A Paper Presented at the Joint Session of the Amer. Agr. Econ. and the Amer. Finance Assoc., Toronto, Canada, 1972.Google Scholar
Müller, J., “On Sources of Measured Technical Efficiency: The Impact of Information.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 56(1974):730–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otto, M. L.Farmers Use and Knowledge of Sources of Credit in Marshall and Soline Counties in Kansas. Kansas Exp. Sta. Agr. Econ. Rpt. No. 57, 1953.Google Scholar
Pindyck, R. S., and Rubinfeld, D. L.. Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976.Google Scholar
Rubinfeld, D. L. “Voting in a Local School Election: A Micro Analysis.” Rev. Econ. Stat. 59(1977):30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell, G. J., Hopkins, R. J., and Barnett, R.. “Attitudes of Tennessee Farmers Toward Credit.” Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. No. 497, University of Tennessee, 1977.Google Scholar
Spitze, R. G. F. and Bevins, R. J.. “The Agricultural Representative Program in Commercial Banks of Tennessee.” Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. No. 289, University of Tennessee, 1958.Google Scholar
Spitze, R. G. F. and Romans, R. T.. “Knowledge of Credit by Tennessee Farmers and its Effects Upon Financial Practices.” Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. No. 339, University of Tennessee, 1962.Google Scholar
Tobin, James. “Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables.” Econometrica 26(1958):24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Census of Agriculture 1978. Vol. 1, State and County Data, Part 2, Tennessee, Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Welch, Finis. “Education and Racial Discrimination.” In Discrimination in Labor Markets, edited by Ashenfetter, Orley and Rees, Albert. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1973, pp. 43–81.Google Scholar
Wise, J. O.An Analysis of Agricultural Credit in Laurens County, Georgia. College Exp. Sta. Bull. No. 148, University of Georgia, 1965.Google Scholar
Woodworth, R. C., Comer, S. L., and Edwards, R. J.. A Comparative Study of Small, Part-time, Retirement, and Large Farms in Three Counties in Central and West Tennessee. School of Agr. and Home Econ. Bull. No. 38, Tennessee State University, 1978.Google Scholar
Ziemer, R. F., and White, F. C.. “A Tobit Model of the Demand for Farmland.” S. J. Agr. Econ. 13(1981):105–109.Google Scholar