Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T15:28:01.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Price, Yield, and Gross Revenue Variability for Selected Georgia Crops*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Melvin E. Walker Jr.  and
Kuang-hsing T. Lin
Melvin E. Walker Jr.
Affiliation:
The Fort Valley State College, Fort Valley, Georgia
Kuang-hsing T. Lin
Affiliation:
The Fort Valley State College, Fort Valley, Georgia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A topic of considerable recent discussion is the use of high return per acre crops such as vegetables as a possible means of improving income levels on small, limited-resource farms. Though production economic analyses (those using conventional techniques such as budgeting and linear programming) indicate that farmers with small acreage might increase their income substantially by selecting vegetable enterprises, very few farmers are selecting vegetables over field crops. One possible explanation for their failure to do so is that the income from vegetable crops is more variable than that from field crops, and owners of small farms are more inclined to produce crops that will yield a lower but more stable level of income.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , July 1978 , pp. 71 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Comments by Tsoung-Chao Lee of The University of Connecticut and unknown reviewers are acknowledged.

References

[1]Carter, H. O. and Dean, G. W.. “Income, Price and Yield Variability for Principal California Crops and Cropping Systems,” Hilgardia, Volume 30, 1960, pp. 175–218, California Agricultural Experiment Station.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Duloy, J. H. and Norton, R. D.. “CHAC: A Programming Model for Mexican Agriculture,” in Goreaux, L. and Manne, A., eds., Multi-Level Planning: Case Studies in Mexico, Amsterdam: North Holland Publication, 1973, pp. 291–337.Google Scholar
[3]Georgia Crop Reporting Service. Georgia Agricultural Facts, various issues, Athens, Georgia.Google Scholar
[4]Georgia Crop Reporting Service. Georgia Agricultural Prices, various issues, Athens, Georgia.Google Scholar
[5]Grossman, P. A. and Headley, J. C.. “Yield and Income Variability for Major Crops in Illinois: A Basis for Farm Decisions,” AERR No. 73, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station, 1965.Google Scholar
[6]Larson, D. K. and Thompson, L. S.. “Variability of Wheat Yields in the Great Plains,” ERS 287, U. S. Department of Agriculture in cooperation with the Montana Agricultural Experiment Station, 1966.Google Scholar
[7]Leopold, A. C. and Kriedemann, P. E.. Plant Growth and Development, second edition, New-York: McGraw Hill Book Company, 1975, p. 359.Google Scholar
[8]Mathia, G. A. “Measurement of Price, Yield and Sales Variability Indexes for Selected North Carolina Crops,” Economic Research Report No. 36, Department of Economics and Business, North Carolina State University, 1975.Google Scholar
[9]Mathia, G. A. “Empirical Measures of Risk for Selected Field and Horticultural Crops,” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 8, 1976, pp. 115–122.Google Scholar
[10]Nieuwoudt, W. L., Bullock, J. B., and Mathia, G. A.. “An Economic Evaluation of Alternative Peanut Policies,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 58, 1976, pp. 485–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Simmons, R. L. and Pomareda, C.. “Equilibrium Quantity and Timing of Mexican Vegetable Exports,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 57,1975, pp. 472–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Swanson, E. R. “Variability of Yields and Income from Major Illinois Crops, 1927-1953,” Bulletin 610, University of Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Tintner, G.The Variate Difference Method, Cowles Commission for Research in Economics, Bloomington, Indiana: Principia Press, 1940.Google Scholar
[14]Tintner, G.Econome tries, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1952.Google Scholar