Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T05:54:57.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Risk Management Strategies to Reduce Net Income Variability for Farmers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Hamid Falatoonzadeh ,
J. Richard Conner  and
Rulon D. Pope
Hamid Falatoonzadeh
Affiliation:
Texas A & M University California State University, Los Angeles
J. Richard Conner
Affiliation:
Texas A & M University
Rulon D. Pope
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The most useful and practical strategy available for reducing variability of net farm income is ascertained. Of the many risk management tools presently available, five of the most commonly used are simultaneously incorporated in an empirically tested model. Quadratic programming provides the basis for decisionmaking in risk management wherein expected utility is assumed to be a function of the mean and variance of net income. Results demonstrate that farmers can reduce production and price risks when a combination strategy including a diversified crop production plan and participation in the futures market and the Federal Crop Insurance Program (FCIP) is implemented.

Keywords

risk managementquadratic programmingexpected utilityMonte Carlo simulation
Type
Submitted Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , July 1985 , pp. 117 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Jock R., Dillon, John L., and Hardaker, Brian. Agricultural Decision Analysis, Ames, Iowa: The Iowa State University Press, 1st ed., 1977.Google Scholar
Batta, Raveendra N.The Pure Theory of International Trade Under Uncertainty, New York, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1975.Google Scholar
Batra, Raveendra N. and Ullah, Aman. “Competitive Firm and the Theory of Input Demand Under Price Uncertainty.” J. Polit. Econ., 83(1974):537–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berck, Peter. “Portfolio Theory and the Demand for Futures: Theory and the Case of California Cotton.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 63(1981):466–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, Margaret. “Futures Trading, Rational Expectations, and the Efficiency Markets Hypothesis.” Econometrica, 49(1981):575–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chavas, Jean-Paul and Pope, R. D.. “Hedging and Productive Decisions Under a Linear Mean-Variance Preference Function.” paper in press, Dept. of Agr. Econ., Texas A & M University, 1982.Google Scholar
Danthine, J. P. “Information, Futures Prices and Stabilizing Speculation.” J. Econ. Theory, 17(1978):79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falatoonzadeh, Hamid. “An Analysis of the Role of Futures Markets and Federal Crop Insurance in Risk Management.” Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A & M University, 1983.Google Scholar
Feder, G., Just, R. E., and Schmitz, A.. “Futures Markets and the Theory of the Firm Under Price Uncertainty.” Quart. J. Econ., 44(1980):317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freund, R. J. “The Introduction of Risk into a Programming Model.” Econometrica, 24(1956):253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Bruce L. and Kramer, Randall A.. “The U.S. Experience in Crop Insurance Programs.” presented paper at the Conference on Agricultural Risks, Insurance, and Credit in Latin America, San Jose, Costa Rica, February, 1982.Google Scholar
Hazell, P. B. R. “A Linear Alternative to Quadratic and Semivariance Programming for Farm Planning Under Uncertainty.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 53(1971):53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holthausen, D. “Hedging and the Competitive Firm Under Price Uncertainty.” Amer. Econ. Rev., 69(1979):989–995.Google Scholar
Lin, William, Dean, G. W., and Moore, C. V.. “An Empirical Test of Utility Vs. Profit Maximization in Agricultural Production.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 56(1974):497–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mapp, Harry P. Jr., Hardin, Michael L., Walker, Odell L. and Persaud, Tillak. “Analysis of Risk Management Strategies for Agricultural Producers.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 63(1979):1,071–1,077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowitz, Harry. Portfolio Selection, Efficient Diversification of Investments, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
McKinnon, R. I. “Futures Markets, Buffer Stocks, and Income Stability for Primary Producers.” J. Polit. Econ., 75(1967):844–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musser, Wesley N. and Stamoulis, Kostas G.. “Evaluating the Food and Agriculture Act of 1977 with Firm Quadratic Risk Programming.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 63(1981):447–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newberry, David M. G. and Stiglitz, Joseph E.. The Theory of Commodity Price Stabilization, New York, New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Paris, Quirino. “Revenue and Cost Uncertainty, Generalized Mean-Variance, and the Linear Complementarity Problem.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 61(1979):268–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, Anne E. “Hedging and Income Stability: Concepts, Implications and an Example.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 90(1976):407–423.Google Scholar
Pope, Rulon D. and Kramer, Randall A.. “Hedging and Risk.” Unpub. Paper, Dept. of Agr. Econ., University of California, Davis, California, 1978.Google Scholar
Pope, Rulon D. and Kramer, Randall A.. “Production Uncertainty and Factor Demands for the Competitive Firm.” So. Econ. J., 46(1979):489–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, R. B. and Gaumnitz, J. E.. “Stochastic Dominance vs. Mean-Variance Portfolio Analysis: An Empirical Evaluation.” Amer. Econ. Rev., 62(1974):438–446.Google Scholar
Rae, Allan N. “An Empirical Application and Evaluation of Discrete Stochastic Programming in Farm Management.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 53(1971):625–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratti, Ronald A. and Ullah, Aman. “Uncertainty in Production and the Competitive Firm.” So. Econ. J., 42(1976):703–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robison, Lindon J. and Brake, John R.. “Application of Portfolio Theory to Farm and Lender Behavior.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 61(1979):158–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockwell, Charles S. “Normal Backwardation, Forecasting and the Returns to Commodity Futures Traders.” Food Res. Inst. Stud., supplement to 8(1967):107–130.Google Scholar
Rolfo, Jacques. “Optional Hedging Under Price and Quantity Uncertainty: The Case of the Cocoa Producers.” J. Polit. Econ., 88(1980):100–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutledge, David J. “Hedgers' Demand for Future Contracts: A Theoretical Framework with Applications to the United States Soybean Complex.” Food Res. Inst. Studies, 11(1972):237–256.Google Scholar
Sandmo, A. “Competitive Firm Under Price Uncertainty.” Amer. Econ. Rev., 61(1971):65–73.Google Scholar
Sharpe, William F.Portfolio Theory and Capital Markets, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1970.Google Scholar
Telser, Lester G. “The Supply of Speculative Services in Wheat, Corn and Soybeans.” Food Res. Inst. Stud., supplement to 8(1967):131–176.Google Scholar
Texas Agricultural Extension Service. Crop Insurance Analysis Sheet 2- Participation and Acreage Summary, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas; March, 1981.Google Scholar
Vajda, S.Probabilistic Programming, New York, New York; Academic Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O.. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Second ed., Chapter 3 and Appendix. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Wiens, Thomas B. “Peasant Risk Aversion and Allocative Behavior: A Quadratic Programming Experiment.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 48(1976):629–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar