Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T22:50:51.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adaptive Planning Under Price Uncertainty in Pork Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Ronald L. Plain
Affiliation:
University of Missouri-Columbia
Joseph E. Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University

Extract

Market hog prices historically have shown great variation and have often followed a cyclical pattern. Franzmann (1979) finds evidence of a four-year and a twenty-eight-year cycle in hog prices. Price cycles imply the possibility of forecasting long-range prices. In turn, forecasting suggests the opportunity to vary the production or marketing process in order to maximize profits.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, Martin E.Harmonic Analysis of Seasonal Variation with an Application to Hog Production.J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 57(1962)665–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franzmann, John R.A Long Cycle in Hog Prices—What Would It Mean to Hog Producers?Oklahoma Current Farm Economics, 52(1979)10–12.Google Scholar
Ikerd, John E.Forward Pricing for Maximum Producer Profits.” Proc. Futures Trading Seminar, Chicago Board of Trade, Vol. IV, 1976, pp. 19.Google Scholar
Purcell, Wayne D.Marketing Implications of the Price Cycle in Hogs.” Virginia Agr. Econ. Paper No. 302, May, 1979.Google Scholar
Stigler, George. “Production and Distribution in the Short Run.J. Pol. Econ. 47(1939)30527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Joseph E. and Plain, Ronald L.A Comparison of Investment Requirements and Costs of Production for Selected Swine Enterprises and Production Systems in Oklahoma.Oklahoma Current Farm Economics, 52(1979)2127.Google Scholar