Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T02:01:33.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Distortionary Impacts of the 1982 and 1986 U.S. Tax Codes on Capital Investments: A Case Study of Investment in Orange Groves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Charles B. Moss
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Florida, Gainesville
Ronald P. Muraro
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Florida, Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred
William G. Boggess
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Florida, Gainesville

Abstract

The 1980s have been a period of dramatic change for the income tax code in the United States. Although numerous modifications were considered in policy deliberations, two key goals, the reduction of the importance of tax considerations in investment decisions and tax simplification, emerged from the discussion and guided drafting of the 1986 Tax Reform Act. This study examines the importance of tax considerations in investment decisions under the provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 and its predecessor, the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982. The study then compares the tax liability under these tax codes with a nondistortionary tax scheme. Results indicate that the Tax Reform Act of 1986 reduced the distortionary effects of the tax code on capital investment decisions. However, a large portion of the reduction can be attributed to the change in the average tax rate.

Type
Submitted Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chisholm, A.H.Effects of Depreciation Policy and Investment Incentives on Optimal Replacement Decisions.Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 56(1974):776783.Google Scholar
Commerce Clearing House, Inc. Tax Law Editors. Explanation of Tax Reform Act of 1986 Commerce Clearing House, Inc. October 1986.Google Scholar
Davenport, C, Boehlje, M.D., and Martin, D.B.H.. The Effects of Tax Policy on American Agriculture. U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service, Agricultural Report Number 480,1982.Google Scholar
Durst, R.The New Tax Law and Its Effects on Farmers.” Agricultural Outlook. Washington, D.C.: Economic Research Service, November, 1986.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. Introduction to Difference Equations With Illustrative Examples from Economics, Psychology and Sociology. New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1986.Google Scholar
Hanson, G.D. and Bertelsen, D.R.. “Tax Reform Impacts on Agricultural Production and Investment Decisions.Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 69(1987):101320.Google Scholar
Hanson, G.D. and Eidman, V.R.. “Agricultural Income Tax Expenditures—A Microeconomic Analysis.Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 67(1985):271278.Google Scholar
Kay, R.D. and Rister, E.. “Effects of Depreciation Policy and Investment Incentives on Optimal Equipment Replacement Decisions: Comment.Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 58(1976):355358.Google Scholar
Lynne, G.D.Machinery Replacement, Multiple Optima, and the 1986 Tax Reform Act.So. J. Agr. Econ., 20(1988):179188.Google Scholar
Muraro, R.P. and Fairchild, G.F.. “Economic Factors Affecting Postfreeze Production Decisions in the Florida Citrus Industry.Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc, 98(1985):6570.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P.A.Tax Deductibility of Economic Depreciation to Insure Invariant Valuations.Journal of Political Economy, 72(1964): 604606.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress. Conference Report. Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981. 97th Congress, 1st Session, House Report No. 97-215, August 1,1981.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress. Conference Report. Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982. 97th Congress, 2nd Session, House Report 97-624, August 17,1982.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress. Conference Report. Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988. 100th Congress, 2nd Session, House Report 100-1104, October 21,1988.Google Scholar