Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:36:30.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Issues and Strategies for Aggregate Supply Response Estimation for Policy Analyses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Octavio A. Ramirez ,
Samarendu Mohanty ,
Carlos E. Carpio  and
Megan Denning
Octavio A. Ramirez
Affiliation:
New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM
Samarendu Mohanty
Affiliation:
Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX
Carlos E. Carpio
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Megan Denning
Affiliation:
Texas Tech University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We demonstrate the use of the small-sample econometrics principles and strategies to come up with reliable yield and acreage models for policy analyses. We focus on demonstrating the importance of proper representation of systematic and random components of the model for improving forecasting precision along with more reliable confidence intervals for the forecasts. A probability distribution function modeling approach, which has been shown to provide more reliable confidence intervals for the dependent variable forecasts than the standard models that assume error term normality, is used to estimate cotton supply response in the Southeastern United States.

Keywords

nonnormalityprobability distribution functionsupply responseQ11Q18C32
Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , August 2004 , pp. 351 - 367
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartlett, M.S. “On the Theoretical Specification of Sampling Properties of Autocorrelated Time Series.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B8 27(1946):27–41.Google Scholar
Box, G.E.P., and Pierce, D.A.. “Distribution of Residual Autocorrelations in Autoregressive-Inte-grated Moving Average Time Series Models.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 65(December 1970):1509–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denning, M. “Producer Supply Response for Cotton in the United States.” M.S. thesis. Texas Tech University, 2002.Google Scholar
Judge, G.G., Griffiths, W.E., Hill, R. Carter, Lutkepohl, H., and Lee, T.-C.. The Theory and Practice of Econometrics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1985.Google Scholar
Maddala, S.G.Introduction to Econometrics, 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan, 1992.Google Scholar
Ramirez, O.A., and Somarriba, E.. “Risk and Returns of Diversified Cropping Systems under Nonnormal, Cross and Autocorrelated Commodity Price Structures.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 25(2000):653–68.Google Scholar
Ramirez, A.O., and Fadiga, M.. “Forecasting Agricultural Commodity Prices with Asymmetric-Error GARCH Models.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 28(2003):71–85.Google Scholar
Ramirez, O.A., Misra, S., and Field, J.. “Crop Yield Distribution Revisited.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(2003):108–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramirez, O.A., Misra, S., and Nelson, J.. “Efficient Estimation of Agricultural Time Series Models with Nonnormal Dependent Variables.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(2003):1029–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar