Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T22:04:15.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pest Information Markets and Integrated Pest Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Michael E. Wetzstein
Michael E. Wetzstein*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Georgia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Integrated pest management (IPM) programs vary from employing field scouts to planting trap crops, as inputs in production, to control crop losses. Scouts provide pest information, helping to determine the need for pesticide applications. This increased information may indicate a reduction of periodic application, which would diminish the negative external effects that such treatments have on environmental quality.

Recent research in this area has determined the need for pest information (Regev et al.) and the rationale for established information markets (Feder). Currently, such sources exist throughout the United States, and both public and private consultants supply information to agricultural producers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , December 1981 , pp. 79 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J. R., Dillon, J. L., and Hardaker, J. B.Agricultural Decision Analysis. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Bator, F. M.The Question of Government Spending. New York: Crowell-Collier, 1962.Google Scholar
Batra, R. “Resource Allocation in a General Equilibrium Model of Production Under Uncertainty.” J. Econ. Theory 8(1974):50–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumol, W.Welfare Economics. 2nd ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. “The Problem of Social Cost.” J. Law and Econ. 3(1960): 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demsetz, H. “Toward a Theory of Property Rights.” Amer. Econ. Rev. 57(1967):347–73.Google Scholar
Feder, G. “Pesticides, Information, and Pest Management Under Uncertainty.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 61(1979):97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, D. C. “The Profitability of Integrated Pest Management: Case Studies for Cotton and Citrus in the San Joaquin Valley.” E. S. A. Bull. 23(1977):267–74.Google Scholar
Haveman, R.The Economics of the Public Sector. New York: John Wiley, 1970.Google Scholar
Hueth, D. and Regev, U. “Optimal Agricultural Pest Management with Increasing Pest Resistance.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 57(1974):543–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, H. and Markowitz, H. M. “Approximating Expected Utility by a Function of Mean and Variance.” Amer. Econ. Rev. 69(1979):308–317.Google Scholar
Magnusson, G.Production Under Risk: A Theoretical Study. Uppsala: Almqvist and Wiksells, 1969.Google Scholar
Norgaard, R. B. “The Economics of Improving Pesticide Use.” Ann. Rev. Entomol. 21(1976):45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regev, V., Gutierrez, A. P., and Feder, G. “Pests as a Common Property Resource: A Case Study in Alfalfa Weevil Control.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 58(1976): 186–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, Paul. “Pure Theory of Public Expenditure and Taxation,” in Margolis, J. and Guitoon, H., ed., Public Economics. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1969, pp. 98–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, A. A.Property, Power, and Public Choice: An Inquiry into Law and Economics. Holt, Rine-hart and Winston, Inc., Praeger Publishers, 1978.Google Scholar
Smith, Ronald H. “A New Concept in Evaluating IPM Programs.” Paper presented at Fifty-Fourth Meeting, Southeastern Branch, Entomological Society of America, Biloxi, Mississippi, January 29-31, 1980.Google Scholar