Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T23:35:07.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantifying Gains To Risk Diversification Using Certainty Equivalence In A Mean-Variance Model: An Application To Florida Citrus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2016

Allen M. Featherstone
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University
Charles B. Moss
Affiliation:
Food and Resource Economics, University of Florida

Abstract

The marginal benefit and cost of diversification for Florida orange producers is analyzed using certainty equivalents. Results indicate that for moderate and high levels of risk aversion, diversification into strawberry, grapefruit, or additional orange production is not optimal. However, moderately risk averse Florida orange producers can gain by diversifying into grapefruit production if the annual amortized fixed costs can be reduced by as little as 10 percent.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R.M. Menkhaus, D.J., and Woolery, B.A.. “Alternative Parameter Specification in EV Analysis: Implications for Farm Level Decision Making”. West. J. Agr. Econ. 5(1980): 1320.Google Scholar
Anderson, J.R. Dillon, J.L., and Hardaker, J.B.. Agricultural Decision Analysis. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Bussey, L.E. The Economic Analysis of Industrial Projects. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1978.Google Scholar
Florida Agricultural Statistics. Citrus Summary 1987-88. Florida Agricultural Statistics Service, 1222 Woodward Street, Orlando, Florida, 32803, January 1988a.Google Scholar
Florida Agricultural Statistics. Vegetable Summary 1986-87. Florida Agricultural Statistics Service, 1222 Woodward Street, Orlando, Florida, 32803, April, 1988b.Google Scholar
Freund, Rudolf J. “The Introduction of Risk into a Programming Model”. Econometrica. 24(3) (July 1956):253263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heady, E.O. “Diversified Use of Resources in Stabilizing Income”. /J. Farm Econ. 34(1952):482496.Google Scholar
Hewit, Timothy D. Extension Economist, Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Florida, Marianna, Florida, Personal Communication.Google Scholar
Hunt, John R. Appraiser, Barton Realty Inc., Lakeland, Florida. Personal Communication, May, 1988.Google Scholar
Jones, L.E. “Stabilizing Farm Income by Shifting Wheat Land to Grass in the Northern Great Plains”. J. Farm Econ. 32(1950):375390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowitz, Harry. Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1959.Google Scholar
Murraro, Ronald P., Hurner, George T., and Oswald, Thomas W.. “Budgeting Costs and Returns: Central Florida Citrus Production 1988-89”. Economic Information Report #248, Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, 1989.Google Scholar
Raskin, R. and Cochran, M.J., “Interpretations and Transformations of Scale for the Pratt-Arrow Absolute Risk Aversion Coefficient: Implications for Generalized Stochastic Dominance”. West. J. Agr. Econ. 11(1986):204210.Google Scholar
Robison, LJ., and Barry, P.J., The Competitive Firm's Response to Risk, New York, NY: 1987, Macmillan Publishing Company, 1987.Google Scholar
Schurle, B.W. and Erven, B.L.. “The Trade-Off Between Return and Risk in Farm Enterprise Choice”. North Cent. J. Agr. Econ. 1(1979): 1521.Google Scholar
Taylor, Timothy G., and Smith, Scott A.. “Production Costs for Selected Florida Vegetables, 1987-88”. Economic Information Report 245, Food and Resource Economics Department, Agricultural Experiment Stations, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, May, 1988.Google Scholar