Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T13:14:32.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rural Development Research Programs of Southern 1862 and 1890 Land Grant Institutions: Characteristics, Needs, and Priorities for the 1970's*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Carlton G. Davis
Carlton G. Davis*
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Acceptance and increased interest in rural development as a legitimate concern of land grant institutions is well documented. Although rural development research is not “new” for the discipline of agricultural economics, there is little doubt that the area has experienced renewed and greatly expanded interest at both the national and regional levels by the passage of the 1972 Rural Development Act.

While much has been written on the importance and need for a direct frontal attack on this traditionally underfunded and low priority research area, the sad fact is that the profession is still without a clear sense of direction regarding research and extension needs and priorities. The establishment of state and regional rural development centers is a positive step toward directing and coordinating the limited resources available in this area. Many southern states have demonstrated significant leadership roles in this first step, obviously recognizing the massive rural development problems of the region.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , July 1974 , pp. 79 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Series No. 5400.

References

[1] Bawden, D. Lee. ‘The Neglected Human Factor.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 55, No. 5, pp. 879–887, Dec. 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Nicholls, William H. “Southern Tradition and Regional Progress: A Perspective from the 1970's.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 54, No. 5, pp. 736–745, Dec. 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Paarlberg, Don. “Agricultural Programs in the Seventies: The Political-Economic Environment.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 17–21, July 1973.Google Scholar
[4[ Southern Regional Rural Development Research Council. First Report of the Southern Regional Rural Development Research Council to the Southern Experiment Station Directors. July 20, 1973.Google Scholar
[5] Tefertiller, K.R. “Rural Development in an Urban Age.” Presidential Address. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 55, No. 5, pp. 771–777, Dec. 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Tyner, Fred H. “Rural Development Research Under Scrutiny.” Paper presented at Southern Agricultural Economics Association meetings, Memphis, Tenn. Feb. 3-6, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Cooperative State Research Service. Research Work Unit/Project Abstracts, (CRIS No. 326100), Sept. 28, 1973.Google Scholar
[8] West, Quentin W. “Economic Research Trade-Offs Between Efficiency and Equity.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 9–15, July 1973.Google Scholar
[9] Williams, T.T. “The Role of the 1890 Colleges and Universities in Research on Minority Problems.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 55, No. 5, pp. 947–951, Dec. 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar