Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-4thr5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T07:51:47.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wheat Variety Selection to Maximize Returns and Minimize Risk: An Application of Portfolio Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Andrew Barkley
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Hikaru Hawana Peterson
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
James Shroyer
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS

Abstract

This research shows that a portfolio of wheat varieties could enhance profitability and reduce risk over the selection of a single variety for Kansas wheat producers. Many Kansas wheat farmers select varieties solely based on published average yields. This study uses portfolio theory from business investment analysis to find the optimal, yield-maximizing and risk-minimizing combination of wheat varieties in Kansas.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barkley, A.P., and Porter, L.L.The Determinants of Wheat Variety Selection in Kansas, 19741993.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78(1996):202-11.Google Scholar
Barry, P.J.Capital Asset Pricing and Farm Real Estate.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 62(1980):549-53.10.2307/1240213Google Scholar
Blank, S.C.Globalization, Cropping Choices, and Profitability in American Agriculture.Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 33(2001):315-26.10.1017/S1074070800005770Google Scholar
Boland, M., Dhuyvetter, K.C., and Howe, M.Economic Issues with Certified and Farmer-Saved Wheat Seed.” Agricultural Industry Competitiveness MF-2498. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service, July 2001.Google Scholar
Bowden, R., Shroyer, J., Roozeboom, K., Claassen, M., Evans, P., Gordon, B., Heer, B., Janssen, K., Long, J., Martin, J., Schlegel, A., Sears, R., and Witt, M.Performance of Wheat Variety Blends in Kansas.” Keeping Up with Research No. 128. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service, March 2001.10.4148/2378-5977.7327Google Scholar
Carlton, D.W.Contracts, Price Rigidity, and Market Equilibrium.The Journal of Political Economy 87(1979):1034-62.10.1086/260811Google Scholar
Collins, R.A., and Barry, P.J.Risk Analysis with Single-Index Portfolio Models: An Application to Farm Planning.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68(1986): 152–61.10.2307/1241660Google Scholar
Cox, C.M., Garrett, K.A., Bowden, R.L., Fritz, A.K., Dendy, S.P., and Heer, W.F.Cultivar Mixtures for the Simultaneous Management of Multiple Diseases: Tan Spot and Leaf Rust of Wheat.Phytopathology 94(2004):961-69.Google Scholar
Dahl, B.L., Wilson, W.W., and Johnson, D.D.Valuing New Varieties: Trade-Offs between Growers and End-Users in Wheat.Review of Agricultural Economics 26(2004):8296.Google Scholar
Detlefsen, N.K., and Jensen, A.L.A Stochastic Model for Crop Variety Selection.Agricultural Systems 81(2004):5572.10.1016/j.agsy.2003.08.004Google Scholar
Di Falco, S., and Chavas, J.P.Rainfall Shocks, Resilience, and the Effects of Crop Biodiversity on Agroecosystem Productivity.Land Economics 84(2008):8396.Google Scholar
Di Falco, S., and Chavas, J.P.Crop Genetic Diversity, Farm Productivity and the Management of Environmental Risk in Rainfed Agriculture.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 33(2006): 289314.10.1093/eurrag/jbl016Google Scholar
Ehmke, V. Personal communication. Ehmke Seed, Healy, KS. August 2009.Google Scholar
Elton, E.J., Gruber, M.J., Brown, S.J., and Goetzmann, W.N. Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis. 6th Ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2003.Google Scholar
Figge, F.Bio-folio: Applying Portfolio Theory to Biodiversity.Biodiversity and Conservation 13(2004):822-49.Google Scholar
Frontline Systems, Inc. Solver.com. Internet site: http://www.solver.com (Accessed September 16, 2009).Google Scholar
Garrett, K.A., and Cox, C.M.Applied Biodiversity Science: Managing Emerging Diseases in Agriculture and Linked Natural Systems Using Ecological Principles.” Infectious Disease Ecology: The Effects of Ecosystems on Disease and of Disease on Ecosystems. Ostfeld, R., Keesing, F., and Eviner, V., eds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Garrett, K.A., Nelson, R.J., Mundt, C.C., Chacon, G., Jaramillo, R.E., and Forbes, G.A.The Effects of Host Diversity and Other Management Components on Epidemics of Potato Late Blight in the Humid Highland Tropics.Phytopathology 91(2001):9931000.10.1094/PHYTO.2001.91.10.993Google Scholar
Garrett, K.A., and Mundt, C.C.Epidemiology in Mixed Host Populations.Phytopathology 89(1999):984-90.Google Scholar
Griliches, Z.Hybrid Corn: An Exploration in the Economics of Technical Change.Econometrica 25(1957):50122.10.2307/1905380Google Scholar
Hazell, P.B.R., and Norton, R.D. Mathematical Programming for Economic Analysis in Agriculture. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company, 1986.Google Scholar
Heisey, P.W., and Brennan, J.P.An Analytical Model of Farmers' Demand for Replacement Seed.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(1991): 1044–52.10.2307/1242432Google Scholar
Kansas Department of Agriculture. Division of Statistics. Wheat Variety. Various years. Topeka, KS.Google Scholar
Kansas Department of Agriculture. Kansas Agricultural Statistics. Various years. Topeka, KS. Internet site: http://www.ksda.gov/statistics/ (Accessed September 16, 2009).Google Scholar
Kansas State University. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service. Kansas Performance Tests with Winter Wheat Varieties. Various years. Manhattan, KS.Google Scholar
Ladd, G.W., and Martin, M.B.Prices and Demands for Input Characteristics.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 58(1976):2130.10.2307/1238573Google Scholar
Lintner, J.Security Prices, Risk, and Maximum Gains from Diversification.The Journal of Finance 21(1965):587615.Google Scholar
Markowitz, H. Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1959.Google Scholar
McKenzie, A.M., and Kunda, E.L.Managing Price Risk in Volatile Grain Markets, Issues and Potential Solutions.Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 41(2009):353-62.Google Scholar
Melton, B.E., Colette, W.A., and Willham, R.L.Imputing Input Characteristic Values from Optimal Commercial Breed or Variety Choice Decisions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76(1994):478–91.10.2307/1243659Google Scholar
Mündt, C.C.Use of Multiline Cultivars and Cultivar Mixtures for Disease Management.” Annual Review of Phytopathology 40(2002): 381410.10.1146/annurev.phyto.40.011402.113723Google Scholar
Nalley, L.L., Barkley, A., and Chumley, F.G.The Impact of the Kansas Wheat Breeding Program on Wheat Yields, 1911-2006.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 40(2008): 913–25.10.1017/S1074070800002418Google Scholar
Nyikal, R.A., and Kosura, W.O.Risk Preference and Optimal Enterprise Combinations in Kahuro Division of Murang'a District, Kenya.” Agricultural Economics 32(2005): 131–40.Google Scholar
Porter, L.L. and Barkley, A.P. “Selection of Wheat Varieties in Kansas: Does Quality Matter?” Report of Progress 730. Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service, April 1995.Google Scholar
Purcell, D.L., Turner, S.C., Houston, J., and Hall, C.A Portfolio Approach to Landscape Plant Production and Marketing.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 25(1993): 1326.10.1017/S1074070800018927Google Scholar
Redmond, C.H., and Cubbage, F.W.Portfolio Risk and Returns from Timber Asset Investments.Land Economics 64(1988):325-37.10.2307/3146305Google Scholar
Robison, L.J., and Brake, J.R.Application of Portfolio Theory to Farmer and Lender Behavior.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61(1979): 158–64.Google Scholar
Sanchirico, J.N., Smith, M.D., and Lipton, D.W. “Ecosystem Portfolios: A Finance-Based Approach to Ecosystem Management.” Paper presented at the AERE Workshop 2005: Natural Resources at Risk, Jackson, WY, June 2005.Google Scholar
Schurle, B.The Impact of Size on Yield Variability and Crop Insurance Premiums.Review of Agricultural Economics 18(1996):415-22.Google Scholar
Sharpe, W. Portfolio Theory and Capital Markets. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.Google Scholar
Smale, M., Just, R.E., and Leathers, H.D.Land Allocation in HYV Adoption Models: An Investigation of Alternative Explanations.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76(1994):535-46.Google Scholar
Strouts, D. Personal communication. Executive Director, Kansas Crop Improvement Association. Manhattan, KS. August 2009.Google Scholar
Tobin, J.Liquidity Preference as Behavior towards Risk.The Review of Economic Studies 25(1958):6586.10.2307/2296205Google Scholar
Traxler, G., Falck-Zepeda, J., Ortz-Monasterio, J.I., and Sayre, K.Production Risk and the Evolution of Varietal Technology.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(1995): 17.10.2307/1243883Google Scholar
Turvey, C.G., Driver, H.C., and Baker, T.G.Systematic and Nonsystematic Risk in Farm Portfolio Selection.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80(1988):831–36.10.2307/1241924Google Scholar
Watson, S. Wheat Varieties for Kansas and the Great Plains: Your Best Choices for 2007. Topeka, KS: Lone Tree Publishing Co., 2006.Google Scholar
Winston, W.L. Microsoft Excel Data Analysis and Business Modeling. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Press, 2004.Google Scholar