Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-07T06:19:21.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of the effects of liquid manure (urine and water) and nitrogen fertilizers applied to a grass-clover sward on soils of different pH value

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. E. Castle  and
D. Reid
M. E. Castle
Affiliation:
The Hannah Research Institute, Ayr
D. Reid
Affiliation:
The Hannah Research Institute, Ayr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In a 3-year plot experiment on a perennial ryegrass plus white clover sward the pH of the soil on the main plots was adjusted to, and maintained as nearly as possible at, target levels of 5·25, 6·00 and 6·75 by applying either sulphur or lime. Within the main plots the effects on herbage yield, clover content and crude-protein content of applying four fertilizers were compared at nitrogen rates of 225 and 450 kg/ha annually. The fertilizers were liquid manure (urine plus water), prilled urea, a urea solution and an ammonium-nitrate fertilizer. The applications of the urea and the ammonium-nitrate fertilizers were accompanied by dressings of a potassium fertilizer which supplied the same weights of potassium as in the liquid manure. On average the smallest yields of dry matter and crude protein were associated with the lowest soil pH with no significant interactions between pH and fertilizer treatment. The liquid manure gave slightly smaller total yields of mixed herbage dry matter than the other fertilizers, particularly at the low nitrogen rate. The herbage from the liquid manure treatment had a higher clover content and produced a greater total yield of clover dry matter. The effects of the liquid manure on the clover agree with those noted in previous experiments, but no evidence was found that these effects resulted from the liquid manure increasing the pH of the soil and improving the conditions for clover growth. Similarly, no proof was obtained that the clover effects were due to the nitrogen in the liquid manure being wholly in the ammonium form. However, the value of liquid manure as a fertilizer for grassland was demonstrated clearly.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 108 , Issue 1 , February 1987 , pp. 17 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Castle, M. E. & Drysdale, A. D. (1962). Liquid manure as a grassland fertilizer. I. The response to liquid manure and to dry fertilizer. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 58, 165–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, M. E. & Drysdale, A. D. (1966). Liquid manure as a grassland fertilizer. V. The response to mixtures of liquid manure (urine) and dung. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 67, 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drysdale, A. D. (1963). Liquid manure as a grassland fertilizer. II. The response to winter applications. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 61, 353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drysdale, A. D. (1965). Liquid manure as a grassland fertilizer. III. The effect of liquid manure on the yield and botanical composition of pasture, and its interaction with nitrogen, phosphate and potash fertilizers. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 65, 333–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, D. (1970). The effects of a wide range of nitrogen application rates on the yields from a perennial ryegrass sward with and without white clover. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 74, 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volk, G. M. (1959). Volatile loss of ammonia following surface application of urea to turf or bare soils. Agronomy Journal 51, 746–749.Google Scholar