Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-05T08:04:14.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Crop patterns recorded on aerial photographs of England and Wales: their type, extent and agricultural implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. Evens
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Downing Place, Cambridge CB2 3EN, UK

Summary

Crop patterns of natural origin and man-created crop marks are frequently recorded on aerialphotographs taken over England and Wales. They usually indicate subsil variation over short distances, but differences in crop growth may also be evident in relation to topsoil variability. Different kinds of crop patterns and the soils on which crop patterns and marks develop are briefly described. Soil associations in which crop patterns and marks are frequently and extensively recorded cover 25% (37664 km2) of England and Wales; in dry years, patterns and marks are extensively recorded over a further 6·5% (9884 km2). Crop patterns and marks indicate that over much of England and Wales crop growth may be impeded by properties intrinsic to the soil, which are not easily ameliorated by farmers. When siting crop experiments, care should be taken to avoid these areas of complex soil patterns.

Type
Crops and Soils
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bowen, H. C. & Butler, R. M. (1960). A Matter of Time. London: Royal Commission on Historical Monuments, HMSO.Google Scholar
Catt, J. A. (1986). Soil and Quaternary Geology. A Handbook for Field Scientists. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Evans, R. (1972). Air photographs for soil survey in lowland England: soil patterns. Photogrammetric Record 7, 302322.Google Scholar
Evans, R. (1974). The time factor in aerial photography for soil surveys in lowland England. In Environmental Remote Sensing: Applications and Achievements (Eds Barret, E. C. & Curtis, L. C.), pp. 6786. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Evans, R. (1976). Observations on a stripe pattern. Biulelyn Peryglacjalny 25, 922.Google Scholar
Evans, R. (1980). Annual Report for 1979, Soil Survey of England and Wales. Harpenden: Soil Survey of England and Wales.Google Scholar
Evans, R. (1990). Soil erosion: its impact on the English and Welsh landscape since woodland clearance. In Soil Erosion on Agricultural Land (Eds Boardman, J., Foster, I. & Dearing, J.), pp. 231254. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Evans, R. & Carroll, D. M. (1976). Remote sensing for small scale soil mapping in England and Wales. In Land Use Studies by Remote Sensing (Eds Collins, W. G. & Genderen, J. L. Van), pp. 84122. Reading: Remote Sensing Society.Google Scholar
Evans, R. & Catt, J. A. (1987). Causes of crop patterns in eastern England. Journal of Soil Science 38, 309324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, R. & Jones, R. J. A. (1977). Crop marks and soils at two archaeological sites in Britain. Journal of Archaeological Science 4, 6376.Google Scholar
Hampton, J. N. & Palmer, R. (1977). Implications of aerial photography for archaeology. Archaeological Journal 134, 157193.Google Scholar
Harrod, M. F. (1975). Field behaviour of light soils. In Soil Physical Conditions and Crop Production, pp. 2251. MAFF Technical Bulletin 29. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Jones, R. J. A. & Evans, R. (1975). Soil and crop marks in the recognition of archaeological sites by air photography. In Aerial Reconnaissance for Archaeology (Ed Wilson, D. R.), pp. 112. Research Report No. 12. London: Council for British Archaeology.Google Scholar
London Weather Centre. (1989). UK Monthly Weather Summaries. London: London Weather Centre.Google Scholar
Mackney, D., Hodgson, J. M., Hollis, J. M. & Staines, S. J. (1983). Legend for the 1:250000 Soil Map of England and Wales. Harpenden: Soil Survey of England and Wales.Google Scholar
Ministry Of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1989). Agricultural Statistics. United Kingdom 1987. London: Government Statistical Office, HMSO.Google Scholar
Maxwell, G. S. (Ed) (1983). The Impact of Aerial Reconnaissance on Archaeology. CBA Research Report No. 49. London: Council for British Archaeology.Google Scholar
Meteorological Office (1989). MORECS (Meteorological Office Rainfall and Evaporation Calculation System) Monthly Data. Bracknell: Meteorological Office.Google Scholar
Pickering, J. & Hartley, R. F. (1985). Past Worlds in a Landscape. Archaeological Reports Series No. 11. Leicester: Leicestershire Museums, Art Galleries and Records Service.Google Scholar
Rlley, D. N. (1982). Aerial Archaeology in Britain. Aylesbury: Shire Publications.Google Scholar
Silvey, V. (1986). The contribution of new varieties to cereal yields in England and Wales. Journal of the National Institute of Agricultural Botany 17, 155168.Google Scholar
Soil Survey Of England and Wales (1983). Soil Map of England and Wales. Harpenden: Soil Survey of England and Wales.Google Scholar
Soil Survey of England and Wales (1984). Soils and their Use in (i) Northern England; (ii) Wales; (iii) Midland and Western England; (iv) Eastern England; (v) South West England, and (vi) South East England. Regional Bulletins B10–B15. Harpenden: Soil Survey of England and Wales.Google Scholar
Webster, G. & Hobley, B. (1965). Aerial reconnaissance over the Warwickshire Avon. Archaeological Journal 121, 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whimster, R. (1983). Aerial reconnaissance from Cambridge: a retrospective view 1945–80. In The Impact of Aerial Reconnaissance on Archaeology (Ed. Maxwell, G. S.), pp. 92105. CBA Research Report No. 49. London: Council for British Archaeology.Google Scholar
Whimster, R. (1989). The Emerging Past. Air Photography and the Buried Landscape. London: Royal Commission on the Historical Monuments of England.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. R. (1982). Air Photo Interpretation for Archaeologists. London: Batsford.Google Scholar