Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T18:46:36.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dynamics of seedling emergence of opaque-2 and analogous normal maize in cold tests and effect of fungicide seed treatment on their cold tolerance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. Gupta
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Martonvásár, Hungary
I. Kovács
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Martonvásár, Hungary

Summary

Six opaque·2 (O2) inbred lines and the single, three-way and double-cross hybrids derived from them were compared for emergence at low temperatures with their analogous normal inbred lines and hybrids. The results demonstrate that there is an increasing difference in emergence between the o2 and the normal forms with an increase in the period of incubation, the o2 types being inferior, in general, to the normal.

A treatment of seeds with fungicides like Quinolate V4X, TMTD–Lindan and Vitavax 75W before sowing improved the cold tolerance of both the o2 and normal analogues, but the o2 forms remained far below the level of the normal.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clark, B. E. (1954). Factors affecting the germination of sweet corn in low temperature laboratory tests. New York (Geneve) Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 769. 23 pp.Google Scholar
Cochran, W. G. & Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental Designs. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Dickson, J. G., Eckerson, S. H. & Link, K. P. (1923). The nature of resistance to seedling blight of cereals. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences 9, 434–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gotlin, J. & Pucaric, A. (1969). Intenzitet klijanja (nicanja) i klijavosti sjemena kukuruza mocenog u nekim kemijskim spojovima u uvjetima cold testa. (The effect of some chemical compounds on intensity of emergence under cold test germination of seed corn.) Agronomski glasnik 7, 433–42.Google Scholar
Gupta, D. & Kovács, I. (1975). Cold tolerance of parents, single, 3-way and double crosses of opaque-2 maize inbreds and their normal analogues. Euphytica 24. (In the press.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haskell, G. (1948). Effect of low temperature on the germination of inbred lines of sweet corn. Science 107, 150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herczegh, M. (1970). Some problems of cold tolerance. In Some Methodological Achievements of the Hungarian Hybrid Maize Breeding, pp. 271–81 (ed. Kovács, I.), Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Hoppe, P. E. (1951). A new technique for incubating seed corn in cold soil for disease tests. Phytopathology 41, 747–51.Google Scholar
Livingston, J. E. (1951). Effect of low temperature on the germination of artificially dried seed corn. Univ. of Nebraska College of Agriculture, Agricultural Experiment Station Research Bulletin 169, 14 pp.Google Scholar
Segeta, V. & Stanek, M. (1961). Chladuvzdornost kukurice a patogenni mikroflóra (Cold resistance of maize and pathogenic microflore). Rostlinná vyroba 6 (33), 1639–56Google Scholar