Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T11:19:15.558Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of cycocel on the growth, abscission and yield of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. S. Dhillon ,
D. S. Kler  and
Des Raj
G. S. Dhillon
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
D. S. Kler
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
Des Raj
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A large number of flower buds, flowers and premature bolls of cotton are shed without contributing to seed-cotton yield. Abscission may be affected by environmental factors. It may, therefore, be possible to reduce it by modifying the micro-environment within the crop canopy.

Type
Short Notes
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 94 , Issue 2 , April 1980 , pp. 489 - 491
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addicot, F. T. (1968). Environmental factors in the physiology of abscission. Plant Physiology 43, 1471–1479.Google Scholar
Bonner, J. (1962). The upper limit of crop yield. Science 113, 11–15.Google Scholar
El-Fouly, M. M. & Ashour, N. I. (1970). Interaction effect of chlorocholine chloride and GA on photosynthetic pigments content in leaves of cotton seedlings. Biochemie und Physiologic der Pflanzen 161, 225–230.Google Scholar
El-Fouly, M. M., Hamawi, H. & Fawzi, A. F. A. (1971). Different effects of chlormequat on chlorophyll, protein and yield in cotton grown under varying water regimes. Plant and Soil 35, 183–186.Google Scholar
El-Fouly, M. M., Salib, J. G. & El-Baz, F. K. (1968). Effect of CCC on cotton plants. Zeitschift für Pflanzenernährung, Dungung und Bodenkunde 121, 66–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kariev, A. U. (1972). Effect of chlormequat on formation and quality of cotton seeds. Uzbek. SSB (FAN), 188–193.Google Scholar
Kulandaivelu, R., Morachan, Y. B. & Raj, S. M. (1974). A note on the effect of cycocel (CCC), nephthalene acetic acid (NAA) and its combination on the growth and yield of cotton (MCV-5). Madras Agricultural Journal 61, 845.Google Scholar
Marani, A., Zur, M., Eshel, A., Zimmerman, H., Carmeli, R. & Karadavid, B. (1973). Effect of times and rate of application of two growth retardants on growth, flowering and yield of upland cotton. Crop Science 13, 429–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S., Kairon, M. S. & Singh, K. (1973). Effect of graded doses of CCC on cotton. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 43, 860–864.Google Scholar
Singh, S., Kairon, M. S., Singh, K. & Tomer, O. S. (1970). Preliminary studies on the effect of Cycocel on cotton. Journal of Research, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 7, 158–162.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. O. (1964). Effect of application, timing and concentration of 2-chloroethyl trimethyl chloride and plant size and fruiting responses of cotton. Crop Science 4, 403–406.Google Scholar
Yuldashev, S. Kh., Litvinova, L. F., Ganiev, V. Sh. & Nazarov, M. (1973). Effect of chlormequat on growth, development and boll formation in different cotton varieties. Uzbeksii Biologi cheskii Zhurnal 2, 594.Google Scholar