Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-01T17:07:41.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of the intensities of potassium and sodium in soil on the growth of sugar beet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. L. Rowell  and
Kamil Erel
D. L. Rowell
Affiliation:
Soil Science Department, The University, Reading, Berks
Kamil Erel
Affiliation:
Soil Science Department, The University, Reading, Berks
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In a pot experiment, the growth of sugar beet on one soil with three levels of exchangeable Na ceased when the intensity of K measured as the activity ratio aK/√[a(Ca + Mg)] in the equilibrium soil solution had fallen to 6 × 10–4 (mole per litre)½;, the intensity of Na, aNa/√[a(CaH-Mg)], to between 1·7 and 4 × 10–3 (mole per litre)½;and exchangeable Mg to 0·14 m-equiv per 100 g soil. It was concluded that both the Na and the K intensities were exhaustion values but that K supply was preventing further growth. The additions of Na did not affect either yield or the uptake of K, Mg and Ca, but more Na was taken up from soils with higher Na levels.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 76 , Issue 2 , April 1971 , pp. 223 - 231
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addiscott, T. M. & Mitchell, J. D. D. (1970). Potassium uptake by potatoes. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 74, 495–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, P. W. (1962 a). Soil potassium and its availability to plants. Outl. Agric. 3, 263–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, P. W. (1962 b). The potassium status of some English soils considered as a problem of energy relationships. Proc. Fertil. Soc. No. 72, 25–43.Google Scholar
Barrow, N. J. (1966). Nutrient potential and capacity. II. Relationship between potassium potential and buffering capacity and the supply of potassium to plants. Aust. J. agric. Res. 17, 849–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrow, N. J., Asher, C. J. & Ozanne, P. G. (1967). Nutrient potential and capacity. III. Minimum value of potassium potential for availability to Trifolium subterraneum in soil and in solution culture. Aust. J. agric. Res. 18, 55–62.Google Scholar
Beckett, P. H. T. B. (1964). Studies on soil potassium. I. Confirmation of the Ratio Law: Measurement of potassium potential. J. Soil Sci. 15, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckett, P. H. T. B., Craig, J. B., Nafady, M. H. M. & Watson, J. P. (1966). Studies in soil potassium. V. The stability of Q/I relations. Pl. Soil 25, 435–55.Google Scholar
Beckett, P. H. T. B. (1967). Potassium potentials. Tech. Bull. Minist. Agric. Fish. Fd. No. 14, Soil Potassium and Magnesium, pp. 32–8. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Harrod, M. F. & Caldwell, T. H. (1967). The magnesium manuring of sugar beet on light sandy soils of East Anglia. Tech. Bull. Minist. Agric. Fish. Fd. No. 14, Soil Potassium and Magnesium, pp. 127–38. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Jarvis, B. A. (1968). Soils of the Reading district. Mem. Soil Surv. Gt Br. Harpenden.Google Scholar
Lehr, J. J. (1942). The importance of sodium for plant nutrition. III. The equilibrium of cations in the beet. Soil. Sci. 53, 399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehr, J. J. (1953). Sodium as a plant nutrient. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 4, 460–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclean, A. J. (1960). Water soluble K, per cent Ksaturation and pK-½p (Ca + Mg) as indices of management effects on K status of soils. Proc. 1th Int. Congr. Soil Sci., Madison, Wis., 3, 86–91.Google Scholar
Mengel, K. (1963). Investigations concerning the ‘K/Ca-potential’. Z. PflErnähr. Düng. Bodenk. 103, 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, A. C. D. (1969). Cation exchange properties of micas. I. The relation between mica composition and potassium exchange in solutions of different pH. J. Soil Sci. 20, 357–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reith, J. W. S. (1967). Effects of soil magnesium levels and of magnesium dressings on crop yield and composition. Tech. Bull. Minist. Agric. Fish. Fd. No. 14, Soil Potassium and Magnesium, pp. 97–109. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Russell, R. D. & Batey, T. Residual effects of potassium fertilizers in five rotation experiments. Tech. Bull. Minist. Agric. Fish. Fd. No. 17. Residual Value of Applied Nutrients. London: H.M.S.O. (in the Press).Google Scholar
Schofield, R. K. (1955). Can a precise meaning be given to ‘available’ soil phosphorus? Soils Fertil. 18, 373–5.Google Scholar
Scott, A. D. & Smith, S. J. (1966). Susceptibility of interlayer potassium in micas to exchange with sodium. Clays Clay Miner. 14, 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talibudeen, O. & Dey, S. K. (1968 a). Potassium reserves in British soils. I. The Rothamsted Classical Experiments. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 71, 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talibudeen, O. & Dey, S. K. (1968 b). Potassium reserves in British soils. II. Soils from different parent materials. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 71, 405–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinker, P. B. (1966). The relationship of sodium in the soil to uptake of sodium by sugar beet in the greenhouse and to yield responses in the field. Trans. Meet. Commns II and IV int. Soc. Soil Sci., pp. 223–31.Google Scholar
Tinker, P. B. & Bolton, J. (1966). Exchange equilibria of sodium on some British soils. Nature, Lond. 212, 548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wild, A., Rowell, D. L. & Ogunfowora, M. A. (1969). The activity ratio as a measure of the intensity factor in potassium supply to plants. Soil Sci. 108, 432–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodruff, C. M. (1955). The energies of replacement of calcium by potassium in soils. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 19, 167–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar