Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:17:09.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect on the rumen composition of feeding sheep diets supplying different starches. II. The partition of nitrogen, pH, volatile fatty acids, protozoal numbers, enzymic activity and certain other chemical constituents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

K. C. Chou  and
D. M. Walker
K. C. Chou
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Sydney, Australia
D. M. Walker
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Sydney, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Three fistulated cross-bred sheep were fed diets which consisted solely of lucerne, cereals or potatoes. Potatoes were fed both in the raw and in the cooked form.

2. A pre-feeding sample of the rumen liquid was examined for its content of protozoa and various chemical components and for its enzymic activity on glucose and on soluble starch.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 62 , Issue 1 , February 1964 , pp. 15 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawala, D., Duncan, C. W. & Huffman, C. F. (1953). J. Nutr. 49, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annison, E. F. (1956). Biochem. J. 64, 705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annison, E. F., Chalmers, M. I., Marshall, S. B. M. & Synge, R. L. M. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 44, 270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annison, E. F. & Lewis, D. (1959). Metabolism in the Rumen, p. 135. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Bailey, C. B. (1959). Proe. Nutr. Soc. 18, xiii.Google Scholar
Baker, F., Nasr, H., Morrice, F. & Bruce, J. (1950). J. Path. Bact. 62, 617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, C. C., Balch, D. A., Bartlett, S., Bartrum, M. P., Johnson, V. W., Rowland, S. J. & Turner, J. (1955). J. Dairy Res. 22, 270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyne, A. W., Campbell, R. M., Davidson, J. & Cuthbertson, D. P. (1956). Brit. J. Nutr. 10, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyne, A. W., Eadie, J. M. & Raitt, K. (1957). J. Gen. Microbiol. 17, 414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, P. K., Franklin, M. C. & McClymont, G. L. (1956). Aust. Vet. J. 32, 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, P. K., Hogan, J. P. & Reid, R. L. (1957). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 8, 674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, K. J. & Clegg, K. M. (1956). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 7, 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chou, K. C. & Walker, D. M. (1964). J. Agric. Sci. 62, 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, A., Kay, R. N. B. & McDonald, I. (1960). Res. Vet. Sci. 1, 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emery, R. S., Smith, C. K., Grimes, R. M., Huffman, C. F. & Duncan, C. W. (1960). J. Dairy Sci. 43, 76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hungate, R. E., Fletcher, D. W., Dougherty, R. W. & Barrentine, B. F. (1955). Appl. Microbiol. 3, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, A. T. (1955). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. 37 (A), 323.Google Scholar
Krogh, N. (1959). Ada vet. scand. 1, 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krogh, N. (1960). Ada vet. scand. 1, 383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krogh, N. (1961). Acta vet. scand. 2, 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marston, H. R. (1948). Biochem. J. 42, 564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moir, R. J. & Somers, M. (1957). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 8, 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myburgh, S. J. & Quest, J. I. (1943). Onderstepoort J. vet. Sci. 18, 119.Google Scholar
McDonald, I. W. (1952). Biochem. J. 51, 86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDougall, E. I. (1948). Biochem. J. 43, 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasr, H. (1950). J. Agric. Sci. 40, 308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peruchon De Brochard, J. (1957). Table Internationale de Composition Chimique des Aliments, 6th ed.Marseille: Association Scientiflque du B.N.A.Google Scholar
Phillipson, A. T. (1952). Brit. J. Nutr. 6, 190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillipson, A. T. (1955). Vet. Bee. 67, 1048.Google Scholar
Purser, D. B. & Moir, R. J. (1959). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 10, 555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rook, J. A. F. (1961). Dairy Sci. Abstr. 23, 251.Google Scholar
Scarisbrick, R. (1954). Vet. Rec. 66, 131.Google Scholar
Sellers, A. F. & Dobson, A. (1960). Res. Vet. Sci. 1, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Der Wath, J. G. (1948). Onderstepoort J. vet. Sci. 23, 367.Google Scholar
Waldo, D. R. & Schultz, L. H. (1956). J. Dairy Sci. 39, 1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, D. M. & Walker, G. J. (1961). J. Agric. Sci. 57, 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, V. J. & Christian, K. R. (1956a). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. 38 (A), 194.Google Scholar
Williams, V. J. & Christian, K. R. (1956b). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. 38 (A), 403.Google Scholar