Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-17T20:51:06.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of time and dose of organic fertilizers on soil fertility, nutrient content and yield of vegetables

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2016

J. F. HERENCIA  and
C. MAQUEDA
J. F. HERENCIA*
Affiliation:
The Andalusian Institute of Agricultural Research and Training (IFAPA) ‘Las Torres-Tomejil’, Alcalá del Río, Seville, Spain
C. MAQUEDA
Affiliation:
Institute of Natural Resources and Agrobiology of Seville (CSIC), Apdo.1052, 41080 Sevilla, Spain
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: juanf.herencia@juntadeandalucia.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A comparative study of the effect of organic fertilization at different times and doses on soil fertility and crop yield was performed over 3 years in a calcareous loamy soil. Nutrient availability in the soil and macronutrient concentration in leaves and in the edible part of the plants was examined in plots that were previously handled conventionally and ecologically for several years. The organic fertilizers used were manure compost at two doses in plots after 4 years of organic management treatment, and green residues of previous crops in plots with 10 years of organic management. In general, soil organic carbon (C), nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P) and magnesium (Mg) contents were found to be considerably greater in organically fertilized soils in comparison with soil receiving mineral fertilizer (conventional treatment (CT)). For C and N, the highest contents were observed in the long-term organic treatment (OR). However, few differences were found for potassium (K) and sodium (Na). The results obtained for electrical conductivity and pH indicated that, in general, there were no significant differences between treatments. The differences in the values of EC and pH occurred among cultivation cycles irrespective of the type of fertilization, but there was a contradictory trend for each of the above parameters. The results obtained for leaves and the edible part of the plant indicated that, in general, there were no significant differences between treatments, except for P with a trend for higher P content in organic crops. The nitrate values in leaves showed great variability, making it difficult to draw conclusions. The associations of fertilization and the chemical properties of soil with nutrient content in crops were checked by principal component analysis (PCA). For soil data, different clusters were observed between CT and OR treatments. However, PCA showed that the influence of crop type on plant nutrient concentrations was greater than type of fertilization. The effect of fertilization on crop yield was variable depending on plant species. The results indicated that organic fertilization did not cause deficiencies in the nutrient content and yield of vegetables when compared with conventional fertilization, showing that ecological management can be used effectively.

Type
Crops and Soils Research Papers
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 154 , Issue 8 , November 2016 , pp. 1343 - 1361
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Altieri, M. A. (1995). Agroecology: the Science of Sustainable Agriculture, 2nd edn. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
Andrews, S. S., Mitchell, J. P., Mancinelli, R., Karlen, D. L., Hartz, T. K., Horwath, W. R., Pettygrove, G. S., Scow, K. M. & Munk, D. S. (2002). On-farm assessment of soil quality in California's Central Valley. Agronomy Journal 94, 12–23.Google Scholar
Bourn, D. & Prescott, J. (2002). A comparison of the nutritional value, sensory qualities, and food safety of organically and conventionally produced foods. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 42, 1–34.Google Scholar
Brucker, S. & Rouiller, J. (1987). Mecanismos de regulación del pH en suelos. In Edafologia 2. Constituyentes y propiedades del suelo (Eds Bonneau, N. & Souchier, B.), pp. 356–367. Barcelona, Spain: Publicaciones Masson. SA.Google Scholar
Bulluck, L. R., Brosius, M., Evanylo, G. K. & Ristaino, J. B. (2002). Organic and synthetic amendment influence soil microbial, physical and chemical properties on organic and conventional farms. Applied Soil Ecology 19, 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, M. S., Horwath, W. R., Shennan, C. & Scow, K. M. (1998). Changes in soil chemical properties resulting from organic and low input farming practices. Agronomy Journal 90, 662–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council of the European Union (1991). Council regulation no. 2092/91 of 24 June 1991 on organic production of agricultural products and indications referring thereto on agricultural products and foodstuffs. Official Journal of the European Communities L198, 1–15.Google Scholar
Demolon, A. & Leroux, D. (1952). Guide pour l’Étude Experimental des Sols. Paris: Gautier Villars.Google Scholar
Drinkwater, L. E., Letourneau, D. K., Workneh, F., Van Bruggen, A. H. C. & Shennan, C. (1995). Fundamental differences between conventional and organic tomato agroecosystems in California. Ecological Applications 5, 1098–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmeades, D. C. (2003). The long-term effects of manures and fertilisers on soil productivity and quality: a review. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 66, 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eghball, B. & Power, J. F. (1999). Composted and noncomposted manure application to conventional and no-tillage systems: corn yield and nitrogen uptake. Agronomy Journal 91, 819–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, G. W. & Bauder, J. W. (1979). Particle size analysis by hydrometer. A simplified method for routine textural analysis and a sensitivity text of measurement parameters. Soil Science Society of America Journal 43, 1004–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gil, M. V., Calvo, L. F., Blanco, D. & Sanchez, M. E. (2008). Assessing the agronomic and environmental effects of the application of cattle manure compost on soil by multivariate methods. Bioresource Technology 99, 5763–5762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gliessman, S. R., Werner, M. R., Swezey, S. L., Caswell, E., Cochran, J. & Rosado-May, F. (1996). Conversion to organic strawberry management changes ecological processes. California Agriculture 50, 24–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomiero, T., Pimentel, D. & Paoletti, M. G. (2011). Environmental impact of different agricultural management practices: conventional vs. organic agriculture. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 30 (Special Issue), 95–124.Google Scholar
Gosling, P. & Shepherd, M. (2005). Long-term changes in soil fertility in organic arable farming systems in England, with particular reference to phosphorus and potassium. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 105, 425–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, R. J. & Naidu, R. (1998). Influence of lime, fertilizer and manure applications on soil organic matter content and soil physical conditions: a review. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 51, 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herencia, J. F., Ruiz-Porras, J. C., Melero, S., Garcia-Galavis, P. A., Morillo, E. & Maqueda, C. (2007). Comparison between organic and mineral fertilization for soil fertility levels, crop macronutrient concentrations, and yield. Agronomy Journal 99, 973–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herencia, J. F., Ruiz, J. C., Melero, S., Garcia Galavis, P. A. & Maqueda, C. (2008). A short-term comparison of organic v. conventional agriculture in a silty loam soil using two organic amendments. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 146, 677–687.Google Scholar
Hesse, P. R. (1971). Total nitrogen. The Kjeldahl process. In A Textbook of Soil Chemical Analysis (Ed. Hesse, P. R.), pp. 520–523. London: John Murray Ltd.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1958). Soil Chemical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
Jones, J. B., Wolf, B. & Mills, H. A. (1991). Factors affecting plant composition. In Plant Analysis Handbook: a Practical Sampling, Preparation, Analysis, and Interpretation Guide (Eds Jones, J. B., Wolf, B. & Mills, H. A.), pp. 45–88. Athens, GA: Micro-Macro Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
Kamphake, L. J., Hannah, S. A. & Cohen, J. M. (1967). Automated analysis for nitrate by hydrazine reduction. Water Research 1, 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knudsen, M. T., Kristensen, I. S., Berntsen, J., Petersen, B. M. & Kristensen, E. S. (2006). Estimated N leaching losses for organic and conventional farming in Denmark. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 144, 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, P., Taji, A. & Reganold, J. (2006). Organic Agriculture: a Global Perspective. Collingwood, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucho-Constantino, C. A., Alvarez-Suarez, M., Beltran-Hernandez, R. I., Prieto-Garcia, F. & Poggi-Varaldo, H. M. (2005). A multivariate analysis of the accumulation and fractionation of major and trace elements in agricultural soils in Hidalgo State, Mexico irrigated with raw wastewater. Environment International 31, 313–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magkos, F., Arvaniti, F. & Zampelas, A. (2003). Organic food: nutritious food or food for thought? A review of the evidence. International Journal of Food Sciences & Nutrition 54, 357–371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MAPA (1994). Métodos Oficiales de Análisis. Tomo III. Madrid: Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación.Google Scholar
Maqueda, C., Herencia, J. F., Ruiz, J. C. & Hidalgo, M. (2011). Organic and inorganic fertilization effects on DTPA-extractable Fe, Cu, Mn and Zn, and their concentration in the edible portion of crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 149, 461–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maroto, J. V. (1995). Horticultura Herbácea Especial. Madrid: Mundi-Prensa.Google Scholar
Melero, S., Ruiz Porras, J. C., Herencia, J. F. & Madejon, E. (2006). Chemical and biochemical properties in a silty loam soil under conventional and organic management. Soil & Tillage Research 90, 162–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, S. R., Cole, C. V., Watanabe, F. S. & Dean, L. A. (1954). Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate. US Department of Agriculture Circular No. 939. Washington, DC: USDA.Google Scholar
Palmer, M. W., Cooper, J., Tetard-Jones, C., Srednicka-Tober, D., Baranski, M., Eyre, M., Shotton, P. N., Volakakis, N., Cakmak, I., Ozturk, L., Leifert, C., Wilcockson, S. J. & Bilsborrow, P. E. (2013). The influence of organic and conventional fertilisation and crop protection practices, preceding crop, harvest year and weather conditions on yield and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum) in a long-term management trial. European Journal of Agronomy 49, 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peigné, J., Ball, B. C., Roger-Estrade, J. & David, C. (2007). Is conservation tillage suitable for organic farming? A review. Soil Use & Management 23, 129–144.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D., Hepperly, P., Hanson, J., Douds, D. & Seidel, R. (2005). Environmental, energetic, and economic comparisons of organic and conventional farming systems. Bioscience 55, 573–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, P., Schoenau, J. J., King, T. & Japp, M. (2005). Effect of repeated manure application on potassium, calcium and magnesium in soil and cereal crops in Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 85, 397–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reider, C. R., Herdman, W. R., Drinkwater, L. E. & Janke, R. (2000). Yields and nutrient budgets under composts, raw dairy manure and mineral fertilizer. Compost Science & Utilization 8, 328–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, A. E. & Simpson, R. J. (2011). Soil microorganisms mediating phosphorus availability. Plant Physiology 156, 989–966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roe, E. (1998). Compost utilization for vegetable and fruit crops. HortScience 33, 934–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schjonning, P., Christensen, B. T. & Carstensen, B. (1994). Physical and chemical properties of a sandy loam receiving animal manure, mineral fertilizer or no fertilizer for 90 years. European Journal of Soil Science 45, 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scow, K., Somasco, M. O., Gunapala, N., Lau, S., Venette, R., Ferris, H., Miller, R. & Shennan, C. (1994). Transition from conventional to low-input agriculture changes soil fertility and biology. California Agriculture 48, 20–26.Google Scholar
Seufert, V., Ramankutty, N. & Foley, J. A. (2012). Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture. Nature 485, 229–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shafi, M., Bakht, J., Jan, M. T. & Shah, Z. (2007). Soil C and N dynamics and maize (Zea may L.) yield as affected by cropping systems and residue management in North-western Pakistan. Soil & Tillage Research 94, 520–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, J.T. (1995). Organic wastes as alternative nitrogen sources. In Nitrogen Fertilization in the Environment (Ed. Bacon, P. E.), pp. 487–535. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc. Google Scholar
Soil Survey Staff (1999). A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Survey. Agriculture Handbook 436. Washington, DC: U S Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Sommers, L. E., Nelson, D. W. & Yost, K. J. (1976). Variable nature of chemical composition of sewage sludges. Journal of Environmental Quality 5, 303–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SPSS Inc. (2001). SPSS for Windows, Release 11.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc.Google Scholar
Stockdale, E. A., Lampkin, N. H., Hovi, M., Keatinge, R., Lennartsson, E. K. M., Macdonald, D. W., Padel, S., Tattersall, F. H., Wolfe, M. S. & Watson, C. A. (2001). Agronomic and environmental implications of organic farming systems. Advances in Agronomy 70, 261–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, K. H. (1998). Anion exchange. In Principles of Soil Chemistry, 3rd edn (Ed. Tan, K. H.), pp. 327–356. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.Google Scholar
Taylor, B. R., Younie, D., Matheson, S., Coutts, M., Mayer, C., Watson, C. A. & Walker, R. L. (2006). Output and sustainability of organic ley/arable crop rotations at two sites in northern Scotland. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 144, 435–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tisdale, S. L., Nelson, W. L., Beaton, J. D. & Havlin, J. L. (1993). Soil Fertility and Fertilizers. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tucker, B. M. (1954). The determination of exchangeable calcium and magnesium in carbonate soils. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 5, 705–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uroz, S., Calvaruso, C., Turpault, M. P. & Frey-Klett, P. (2009). Mineral weathering by bacteria: ecology, actors and mechanisms. Trends in Microbiology 17, 378–387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Delden, A., Schröder, J. J., Kropff, M. J., Grashoff, C. & Booij, R. (2003). Simulated potato yield, and crop and soil nitrogen dynamics under different organic nitrogen management strategies in The Netherlands. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 96, 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warman, P. R. (2005). Soil fertility, yield and nutrient contents of vegetable crops after 12 years of compost or fertilizer amendments. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture 23, 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warman, P. R. & Havard, K. A. (1997). Yield, vitamin and mineral contents of organically and conventionally grown carrots and cabbage. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 61, 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warman, P. R. & Havard, K. A. (1998). Yield, vitamin and mineral contents of organically and conventionally grown potatoes and sweet corn. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 68, 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, C. A., Bengtsson, H., Ebbesvik, M., Løes, A. K., Myrbeck, A., Salomon, E., Schroder, J. & Stockdale, E. A. (2002). A review of farm-scale nutrient budgets for organic farms as a tool for management of soil fertility. Soil Use & Management 18 (Suppl. S1), 264–273.Google Scholar
Watson, C. A., Walker, R. L. & Stockdale, E. A. (2008). Research in organic production systems-past, present and future. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 146, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitbread, A., Blair, G., Konboon, Y., Lefroy, R. & Naklang, K. (2003). Managing crop residues, fertilizers and leaf litters to improve soil C, nutrient balances, and the grain yield of rice and wheat cropping systems in Thailand and Australia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 100, 251–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willer, H. & Kilcher, L. (2009). The World of Organic Agriculture. Statistics and Emerging Trends 2009. Bonn, Frick and Geneva: IFOAM, FiBL and ITC.Google Scholar