Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-05T16:07:47.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experiments on the nutrition of the dairy heifer. II. Experimental methods in short-term experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. L. Bailey
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
W. H. Broster
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
A. W. A. Burt
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading

Extract

1. Data from twenty-four short-term trials on the nutrition of dairy heifers have been used in a study of the effects of management, method of estimation of live-weight gain, length of experimental period, covariance analysis and the use of monozygous twins upon experimental error.

2. The value of rigid adherence to a routine and allowing ample time for the animals to settle down before the trial have been demonstrated.

3. Error standard deviations were associated with length of experimental period, those for 42-day periods being about half those per 21-day periods, but were not appreciably correlated with initial live weight.

4. No advantage could be demonstrated for the use of monozygous twins, or covariance analysis with initial weight or rate of gain, indicating that genetic effects contributed little to the error in experiments lasting 3–6 weeks.

5. There was no significant difference between errors in live-weight gains calculated from the regression of live weight on time, from single initial and final weights, or from two initial and final live weights, indicating that deviations from linear regression are not solely in the nature of random day to day fluctuations in live weight.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, N. (1946). Bull. Vt. Agric. Exp. Sta., no. 534.Google Scholar
Ashton, G. C., Lucas, H. L. Jr. & Sherwood, F. W. (1955). J. Anim. Sci. 14, 1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, G. L. & Broster, W. H. (1957). J. Agric. Sci., 49, 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, A. L., Phillips, R. W. & Black, W. H. (1947). J. Anim. Sci. 6, 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, G. A. & Guilbert, H. R. (1942). J. Anim. Sci. 1, 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, G. A. & Mead, S. W. (1942). J. Dairy Sci. 25, 967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, S. (1926). J. Agric. Sci. 16, 383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, S. & Cotton, A. G. (1938). J. Dairy Res. 9, 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bean, H. W. (1946). J. Anim. Sci. 5, 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bean, H. W. (1948). J. Anim. Sci. 7, 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohman, V. R. (1955). J. Anim. Sci. 14, 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohman, V. R., Trimberger, G. W., Loosli, J. K. & Turk, K. L. (1954). J. Dairy Sci. 37, 284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnier, G., Hannson, A. & Düring, T. (1946). K. Landtbr Akad. Handl., Stockh., 85, 455.Google Scholar
Botkin, M. P. (1955). J. Anim. Sci. 14, 1176.Google Scholar
Brown, B. A. & Slate, W. L. (1929). Bull. Storrs Agric. Exp. Sta., no. 155.Google Scholar
Comstock, R. E., Petersen, W. J. & Stewart, H. A. (1948). J. Anim. Sci. 7, 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampton, E. W. (1933). J. Nutr. 7, 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampton, E. W. & Hopkins, J. W. (1934). J. Nutr. 8, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, I. D. & Whittle, P. (1951). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. B, 33, 145.Google Scholar
Gordon, C. H., Dawson, J. R., Moore, L. A. & Hosterman, W. H. (1952). J. Dairy Sci. 35, 755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. O., Langer, H. J. & Williams, T. E. (1952). Proc. 6th Int. Grassl. Congr. 2, 1374.Google Scholar
Green, W. W. & Burie, J. (1953). J. Anim. Sci. 12, 561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, J. (1951). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. A, 33, 17.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. (1954). Advanc. in Genet. 6, 164. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. P. & Harker, K. W. (1950). J. Agric. Sci. 40, 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Ll. I. (1931). Bull. Welsh Pl. Breed. Sta. series H, no. 13, 93.Google Scholar
Kincaid, C. M., Litton, G. W. & Hunt, R. E. (1945). J. Anim. Sci. 4, 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. W. B. (1953). Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 76.Google Scholar
King, J. W. B. & Donald, H. P. (1955). J. Dairy Res. 22, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, B. Jr. & Clark, R. T. (1947). J. Anim. Sci. 6, 174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lush, J. L., Christensen, F. W., Wilson, C. V. & Black, W. H. (1928). J. Agric. Res. 36, 551.Google Scholar
Magruder, N. D., Knodt, C. B. & Williams, P. S. (1951). J. Anim. Sci. 10, 1055.Google Scholar
Miranda, R. M., Culbertson, C. C. & Lush, J. L. (1946). J. Anim. Sci. 5, 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mott, G. O. (1944). J. Anim. Sci. 3, 450.Google Scholar
Mott, G. O. & Miles, S. R. (1946). J. Anim. Sci. 5, 411.Google Scholar
Patchell, M. R. (1956). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. A, 38, 23.Google Scholar
Patterson, R. E. (1947). J. Anim. Sci. 6, 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhoad, A. O. & Carr, R. B. (1945). Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. 890.Google Scholar
Rupel, I. W., Bohstedt, G. & Hart, E. B. (1941). J. Dairy Sci. 18, 444.Google Scholar
Schalk, A. F. & Amadon, R. S. (1928). Bull. N. Dak. Agric. Exp. Sta. 216.Google Scholar
Steensberg, V. 1947. Brit. J. Nutr. 1, 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, J. F., Converse, H. T. & Moore, L. A. (1955). J. Dairy Sci. 38, 1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, O. O., Clanton, D. C. & Willson, F. S. (1953). J. Anim. Sci. 12, 933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tayler, J. C. (1954). Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 3.Google Scholar
Whiteman, J. V., Loggins, P. F., Chambers, D., Pope, L. S. & Stephens, D. F. (1954). J. Anim. Sci. 13, 832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, F. (1934). J. Agric. Sci. 24, 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar