Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T01:53:23.302Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fleece development and wool growth on the Romney lamb

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. E. Henderson
A. E. Henderson
Affiliation:
Wye College, University of London, and Canterbury Agricultural College, University of New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The extent to which early environment affects wool production of Romney sheep was studied by means of measurement of skin growth, and of fibre numbers and dimensions, of lambs reared to 52 weeks on contrasting planes of nutrition.

Measurement of skin growth revealed a series of gradients which generally conformed with growth and development principles. A great degree of individuality among animals in skin growth on various regions was expressed, and it was not possible to prove that plane of nutrition caused differential skin growth among regions.

An initial low plane of nutrition had a retarding effect on fleece development and fibre growth, but it could not be decided whether there was a permanent effect on fibre numbers. It seems that this is of little practical importance, since a low plane of nutrition during the major part of the follicle development phase does not appear to impair subsequent unit area production, providing immediate nutrition is good.

Examination of fibre attributes, and quantitative fibre growth characteristics on various regions of the body, showed a series of orderly gradients. Large differences existed between the body regions for quantitative production per unit area and this suggests a widely differing nutrient supply of various skin regions.

The importance of immediate nutrition is emphasized. It appears that permanent effects of early environment on future productivity take the form of a lesser area on which wool is produced. The efficiency of the processes, apparently, is not affected.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , January 1953 , pp. 12 - 53
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnicoat, C. R., Logan, A. G. & Grant, A. I. (1949). J. Agric. Sci. 39, 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, D. S., Spencer, D. A. & Hardy, J. I. (1936). Bull. Ohio Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 571.Google Scholar
Berge, S. (1942). Z. Zücht. B, 53, 197. (From Anim. Breed. Abstr. 13, 31.)Google Scholar
Bonnier, G. (1939). Proc. 7th Int. Congr. Genet., Edinburgh, p. 74.Google Scholar
Bosman, V. (1934). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. 3, 217.Google Scholar
Bosman, V. (1937). J. Text. Inst. 28, 270 and 321.Google Scholar
Bosman, V. (1941). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. 17, 345.Google Scholar
Botha, P. S. (1931). S. Afr. J. Sci. 28, 311.Google Scholar
Bowstead, J. E. & Larose, P. (1938). Can. J. Res. D, 16, 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, S. (1945). Bioenergetics and Growth. New York.Google Scholar
Burns, Marca (1949). J. Agric. Sci. 39, 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, R. H. (1931). J. Text. Inst. 22, T 98 and T 456.Google Scholar
Burns, R. H. (1935). Proc. 28th Ann. Meet. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 146.Google Scholar
Burns, R. H. (1937). J. Text. Inst. 28, T 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, R. H. & Miller, W. C. (1931). J. Text. Inst. 22, T 547.Google Scholar
Carter, H. B. (1939). J. Coun. Sci. Industr. Res. Aust. 12, 250.Google Scholar
Carter, H. B. (1942). J. Coun. Sci. Industr. Res. Aust. 15, 217.Google Scholar
Carter, H. B. (1943). Bull. Conn. Sci. Industr. Res. Aust., no. 164.Google Scholar
Carter, H. B. & Hardy, M. H. (1947). Bull. Coun. Sci. Industr. Res. Aust., no. 215.Google Scholar
Carter, H. B. & Hill, J. L. (1942). J. Coun. Sci. Industr. Res. Aust. 15, 227.Google Scholar
Cotsell, J. C. & Elliot, E. A. (1944). Agric. Gaz. N.S.W. 55, 446.Google Scholar
Donald, H. P. & McLean, J. W. (1935). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. A 17, 497.Google Scholar
Dry, F. W. (1932). Nature, Lond., 129, 904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dry, F. W. (1933 a). J. Text. Inst. 24, T 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dry, F. W. (1933 b). N.Z. J. Agric. 46, 10, 141, 279.Google Scholar
Dry, F. W. (1933 c). N.Z. J. Agric. 47, 289.Google Scholar
Dry, F. W. (1933 d). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. A, 14, 353.Google Scholar
Dry, F. W. (1934 a). N.Z. J. Agric. 48, 331.Google Scholar
Dry, F. W. (1934 b). N.Z. J. Agric. 49, 269.Google Scholar
Dry, F. W. (1935). N.Z. J. Agric. 51, 229.Google Scholar
Dry, F. W. (1940). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. A, 22, 209.Google Scholar
Dry, F. W. (1941). Proc. 1st Ann. Conf. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 13.Google Scholar
Dry, F. W., Fraser, A. S. & Wright, G. M. (1947). Nature, Lond., 160, 646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duerden, J. E. (1927). S. Afr. J. Sci. 24, 388.Google Scholar
Duerden, J. E. (1929). S. Afr. J. Sci. 26, 459.Google Scholar
Duerden, J. E. (1932). Nature, Lond., 130, 736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duerden, J. E. & Ritchie, M. I. F. (1924). S. Afr. J. Sci. 21, 480.Google Scholar
Dumaresque, J. A. (1940). Tasmanian J. Agric. 13, 53.Google Scholar
Elphick, B. L. (1932). J. Text. Inst. 23, T 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esminger, M. E. (1942). J. Anim. Sci. 1, 58.Google Scholar
Ferguson, K. A., Carter, H. B. & Hardy, M. H. (1949). Aust. J. Sci. Res. B, 2, 42.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. & Yates, F. (1948). Statistical Tables for Biological and Medical Research Workers, 3rd ed.Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Fraser, A. H. H. & Nichols, J. E. (1934). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 2, 9.Google Scholar
Fraser, A. H. H. & Nichols, J. E. (1935). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 3, 75.Google Scholar
Freney, M. R. & Turner, H. N. (1938). J. Text. Inst. 29, T 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galpin, N. (1935). J. Agric. Sci. 25, 344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galpin, N. (1936 a). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 4, 116.Google Scholar
Galpin, N. (1936 b). Nature, Lond., 138, 585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galpin, N. (1947). J. Agric. Sci. 37, 275.Google Scholar
Galpin, N. (1948). J. Agric. Sci. 38, 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goot, H. (1945). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. A, 27, 45.Google Scholar
Haddow, A. & Rudall, K. M. (1945). Endeavour, 4, 141.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1932). Growth and Development of Mutton Qualities in the Sheep. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1943). Proc. Nutrit. Soc. 2, 8.Google Scholar
Hardy, J. I. (1942). J. Anim. Sci. 1, 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, J. I. & Tennyson, J. B. (1930). J. Agric. Res. 40, 457.Google Scholar
Hardy, J. I. & Wolf, H. W. (1942). Circ. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 654.Google Scholar
Hardy, J. I. & Wolf, H. W. (1947). J. Anim. Sci. 6, 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellinga, G. (1946). Acta brev. neerl. Physiol. 14, 83. (From Anim. Breed. Abstr. 16, 46.)Google Scholar
Henderson, A. E. & McMahon, P. R. (1947). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. A, 29, 22.Google Scholar
Hultz, F. S. & Paschal, L. J. (1930). Bull. Wyoming Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 174.Google Scholar
Hunt, W. E. (1935). Bull. Md Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 380.Google Scholar
Huxley, J. S. (1932). Problems of Relative Growth. London.Google Scholar
Johansson, J. & Berg, L. (1939). Z. Zücht. B, 43, 370. (From Exp. Sta. Rec. 82, 373.)Google Scholar
Jones, J. M., Dameron, W. H., Davis, S. P., Warwick, B. L. & Patterson, R. E. (1944). Bull. Texas Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 657.Google Scholar
Krishnan, T. S. (1939). Indian J. Vet. Sci. 9, 49.Google Scholar
Lang, W. R. (1945). J. Text. Inst. 36, 243.Google Scholar
Lines, E. W. & Peirce, A. W. (1931). Bull. Coun. Sci. Industr. Res. Aust. no. 55.Google Scholar
McMahon, P. R. (1942). Proc. 2nd Ann. Conf. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 61.Google Scholar
McMahon, P. R. (1945). Special publ. No. 1. Wool Metrology Laboratory, Canterbury Agric. Coll., N.Z.Google Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1940). J. Agric. Sci. 30, 276 and 387.Google Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1941). J. Agric. Sci. 31, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1945). Principles of Animal Production. Auckland.Google Scholar
Madsen, M. A., Phillips, R. W., Christensen, J. V. & Henrie, R. L. (1941). Tech. Bull. Utah Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 295.Google Scholar
Marston, H. R. (1935). J. Agric. Sci. 25, 103.Google Scholar
Marston, H. R. (1948). Aust. J. Sci. Res. B, 1, 362.Google Scholar
Miller, W. C. (1933). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 1, 173.Google Scholar
Miller, W. C. & Bryant, D. M. (1932). J. Text. Inst. 23, T 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, J. A. (1921). J. Agric. Sci. 11, 258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, R. W. & Dawson, W. M. (1940). Circ. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 538.Google Scholar
Pohle, E. M., Hazel, L. N. & Keller, H. R. (1945). J. Anim. Sci. 4, 104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohle, E. M. & Keller, H. R. (1943). J. Anim. Sci. 2, 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohle, E. M., Wolf, H. W. & Terrill, C. E. (1943). J. Anim. Sci. 2, 181.Google Scholar
Rae, A. L. (1948). Proc. 3rd Ann. Conf. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. (not available).Google Scholar
Roberts, J. A. F. (1930). J. Text. Inst. 21, T 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, I. C., Chamberlin, W. E. & Turner, H. N. (1937). J. Coun. Sci. Industr. Res. Aust. 10, 313.Google Scholar
Ross, I. C., Graham, N. P. H., Turner, H. N., Carter, H. B. & Munz, H. (1937). Pamph. Coun. Sci. Industr. Res. Aust. no. 71.Google Scholar
Sackville, J. P. & Bowstead, J. E. (1938). Can. J. Res. D, 16, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shier, F. L. & Davenport, N. (1936). J. Dep. Agric. W. Aust. 13 (2nd series), 260.Google Scholar
Strangeways, D. H. (1933). J. Agric. Sci. 23, 359.Google Scholar
Terrill, C. E. & Stoehr, J. A. (1942). J. Anim. Sci. 1, 221.Google Scholar
Underwood, E. J. & Shier, F. L. (1942). J. Dep. Agric. W. Aust. 19 (2nd series), 34.Google Scholar
Underwood, E. J., Shier, F. L. & Cariss, H. G. (1943). J. Dep. Agric. W. Aust. 20 (2nd series), 288.Google Scholar
Wallace, L. R. (1948). J. Agric. Sci. 38, 93, 243 and 367.Google Scholar
Weber, A. D. (1931). Proc. 24th Ann. Meet. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 228.Google Scholar
Wildman, A. B. (1932). Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 102, 257.Google Scholar
Wildman, A. B. (1936 a). J. Text. Inst. 27, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildman, A. B. (1936 b). J. Text. Inst. 27, 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. E. (1938). Hilgardia, 11, 149.Google Scholar
Winters, L. M. & Feuffel, G. (1936). Tech. Bull. Minn. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 118.Google Scholar
Wolf, H. W., Dawson, W. M. & Pohle, E. M. (1943). J. Anim. Sci. 2, 188.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1939). Proc. 32nd Ann. Meet. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 18.Google Scholar