Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T10:29:40.000Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The growth rate of heifers in a dairy herd

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

B. Ridler ,
W. H. Broster  and
A. S. Foot
B. Ridler
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
W. H. Broster
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
A. S. Foot
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Growth rates of Shorthorn and Friesian heifer calves from 0 to 6 months of age were studied from live-weight data collected over a 10-year period.

Friesian calves were heavier than Shorthorn. Male calves were heavier than female. Calves born to the first pregnancy were smaller than those born to later ones. Gestation length was 5 days shorter for Friesian than for Shorthorn cows. It tended to be slightly shorter for female than for male calves. Non-foetal loss of weight at calving was greater with male than with female calves.

High-level feeding before calving was associated with heavier calves but the effect was not statistically significant.

Calf birth weight increased by 0·026 lb./lb. increase in post-calving live weight of the dam and by 0·564 lb./day extension of the gestation period.

Growth rate accelerated from birth to 3–4 months of age and then declined slightly. Autumn-born calves grew faster in the first 90 days than springborn calves. Age of dam and level of feeding before calving had no effect on rate of growth of the calf.

For both breeds there were significant negative correlations between birth weight and rate of gain in the first month after birth.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , August 1963 , pp. 1 - 8
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, G. L. & Broster, W. H. (1954). J. Dairy Res. 21, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, S. & Jameson, J. L. (1932). J. Dairy Res. 3, 310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, P. S., Castle, M. E. & Strachan, N. H. (1958). Brit. Vet. J. 114 (9), 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1944). J. Agric. Sci. 34, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonsma, J. C. (1949). J. Agric. Sci. 39, 204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braude, R. & Walker, D. M. (1949). J. Agric. Sci. 39, 156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, S. (1945). Bioenergetics and Growth. NewYork: Reinhold. Publ. Co.Google Scholar
Brookes, A. J. & Hodges, J. (1959). J. Agric. Sci. 53, 78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broster, W. H., Ridler, B. & Foot, A. S. (1958). J. Dairy Res. 25, 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, A. W. A. (1956). Dairy Sci. Abstr. 18, 883.Google Scholar
Campbell, I. L. & Flux, D. S. (1952). J. Agric. Sci. 42, 150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crichton, J. A., Aitken, J. N. & Boyne, A. W. (1959). Anim. Prod. 1, 145.Google Scholar
Crichton, J. A., Aitken, J. N. & Boyne, A. W. (1960). Anim. Prod. 2, 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, A. G. (1960). J. Agric. Sci. 54, 378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, H. P. (1959). Int. Congr. Genet. Montreal, 1958, 1, 225.Google Scholar
Eckles, C. H. (1920). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 36.Google Scholar
Gregory, K. E., Blunn, C. T. & Baker, M. L. (1950). J. Anim. Sci. 9, 338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. (1952). Farm Animals, their Breeding, Growth and Inheritance. 2nd edition. London: Edward Arnold and Co.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. (1953). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. A, 35, 97.Google Scholar
Hansson, A. (1956). Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod. 51.Google Scholar
Joubert, D. M. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 44, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joubert, D. M. & Hammond, J. (1958). J. Agric. Sci. 51, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, R. M. & Clark, R. T. (1955). J. Anim. Sci. 14, 387, 775.Google Scholar
Kramer, C. Y. (1956). Biometrics, 12, 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leech, F. B. (1958). Vet. Rec. 70, 32.Google Scholar
McMillan, J. A. (1954). Dig. Brit. Cattle Breed. Club, 10, 252.Google Scholar
Milk Marketing Board (1960–1961). Rep. Prod. Div. Milk Market. Bd, 11, 54.Google Scholar
Morrison, F. B. (1956). Feeds and Feeding, 22nd edition. New York: Morrison Publ. Co.Google Scholar
Morton, J. (1959). Fmr & Stk-Breed. 73 (3651), 65.Google Scholar
Reid, J. T. (1953). Proc. Cornell Nutrition Conf. p. 88.Google Scholar
Roy, J. H. B. (1958). Proc. Conf. Scientific Principles of Feeding Farm Livestock. London: Farmer and Stock-Breeder Publications.Google Scholar
Schmidt, G. H. & Schultz, L. H. (1959). J. Dairy Sci. 42, 170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1956). Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 5th edition. Ames: Iowa State College Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, L. R. (1948). J. Agric. Sci. 38, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westmacott, M. H. (1959). Exp. Husbandry, 4, 51.Google Scholar
Wiener, G. (1959). Anim. Prod. 1, 61.Google Scholar
Withers, F. W. (1952). Brit. Vet. J. 108, 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Withers, F. W. (1953). Brit. Vet. J. 109, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar