Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-07T06:16:34.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In vivo colonization of grass cell walls by rumen micro-organisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. Elliott ,
B. W. Norton  and
C. W. Ford
R. Elliott
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4067
B. W. Norton
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4067
C. W. Ford
Affiliation:
Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures, C.S.I.R.O., Cunningham Laboratory, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4067
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Cell wall preparations from stems of four mature grass species, pangola grass, setaria, sugar cane and barley straw were incubated in nylon bags in sheep fitted with rumen cannulae and fed chopped pangola grass at hourly intervals. After varying incubation times D.M. loss, and incorporation of 35S into microbial cystine on the fibres, were measured. Pangola and barley straw were digested to a much greater extent (ca. 48 and 44%) than sugar cane and setaria (ca. 29 and 23% respectively) and digestion was still continuing after 60 h. With the exception of setaria, microbial colonization of the cell wall preparations peaked after 24 h incubation and then declined. In setaria only a small amount of [35S]cystine was measured, the level of which did not change appreciably after 18 h.

After 24 h incubation, microbial colonization on pangola fibre was about three times that on barley straw and sugar cane. Only on pangola fibre did cystine accumulation, and its subsequent rapid decline, coincide with the development and detachment of fungal sporangia. There was no relationship between the extent of microbial colonization and D.M. loss from the fibres. Sulphur concentrations, both in the plant fibres and rumen fluid, could not explain the greater fungal growth on the pangola cell walls in preference to the other species.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 105 , Issue 2 , October 1985 , pp. 279 - 283
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akin, D. E., Gordon, G. L. R. & Hogan, J. P. (1983). Rumen bacterial and fungal degradation of Digitaria pentzii grown with or without sulphur. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 46, 738–748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akin, D. E. & Hogan, J. P. (1982). Factors affecting fibre breakdown in Digitaria pentzii grown with or without sulphur. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 14, 680.Google Scholar
Bauchop, T. (1981). The anaerobic fungi in rumen fibre digestion. Agriculture and Environment 6, 333–348.Google Scholar
Bird, P. R. (1974). Sulphur metabolism, and excretion studies in ruminants. XIII. Intake and utilization of wheat straw by sheep and cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 25, 631–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, M., Gillies, K. A., Hamilton, J. K., Rebers, P. A. & Smith, F. (1956). Colorimetric method for the determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry 28, 350–356.Google Scholar
Elliott, R. & Armstrong, D. G. (1982). The effect of urea and urea plus sodium sulphate on microbial protein production in the rumens of sheep given diets high in alkali-treated barley straw. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 99, 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, C. W. (1983). Effect of particle size and delignification on the rate of digestion of hemicellulose and cellulose by cellulase in mature pangola grass stems. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 34, 241–248.Google Scholar
Hume, I. D. & Bird, P. R. (1970). Synthesis of microbial protein in the rumen. IV. The influence of the level of and form of dietary sulphur. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 21, 315–322.Google Scholar
McManus, W. R., Manta, L., McFarlane, J. D. & Gray, A. C. (1972). The effects of diet supplements and gamma irradiation on dissimilation of low quality roughages by ruminants. I. Studies on the terylenebag technique and effects of supplementation of base ration. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 79, 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. H. F. & Mackie, R. I. (1983). Microbiology of feed samples incubated in nylon bags in the rumen of sheep. South African Journal of Animal Science 13, 220–222.Google Scholar
Okpin, C. G. (1977). On the induction of zoosporogenesis in the rumen phycomycetes, Neocallimastix frontalis, Piromonas communis and Sphaeromonas communis. Journal of General Microbiology 101, 181–189.Google Scholar
Orpin, C. G. & Bountiff, L. (1978). Zoospore chemotaxis in the rumen phycomycete Neocallimaslix frontalis. Journal of General Microbiology 104, 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romero, V. A., Siebert, B. D. & Murray, R. M. (1976). A study on the effect of frequency of urea ingestion on the utilization of low quality roughages by steers. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 16, 308–316.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. (1981). Limiting factors in plant residues of low biodegradability. Agriculture and Environment 6, 135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar