Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-16T22:00:47.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of cotton-seed meal and barley grain supplements on intake, digestion, live-weight gain and wool growth in sheep fed NaOH-treated oat and wheat straw diets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

K. Amaning-Kwarteng  and
R. C. Kellaway
K. Amaning-Kwarteng
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Sydney, N.S.W. 2570, Australia
R. C. Kellaway
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Sydney, N.S.W. 2570, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Growth and digestibility trials were conducted to investigate responses of young cross-bred sheep to alkali-treated straws and supplements. Oat and wheat straws were coarsely milled, sprayed with NaOH solution and then sprayed with a solution containing N, S, P, Cu and Co, and mixed with powdered limestone. The treated straws were fed ad libitum with no supplement (0) or with 150 g/day of either cotton-seed meal (CSM) or whole barley grain (B). In a preliminary trial to study the effect of frequency of ort collection on intake of treated straw, consumption decreased (P < 0·05) when frequency of ort collection was reduced from once daily to once weekly. This was associated with an increase in the neutral detergent fibre content of the orts. During the growth trial, which lasted 105 days, intake of treated straw increased by 34%.

When no supplement was fed, digestibility of treated oat straw was higher (P < 0·05) and dry-matter intake lower (P < 0·05) than that of treated wheat straw. However, calculated intakes of metabolizable energy (ME) and measurements of growth and wool production were similar on the two straws (P > 0·05).

When supplements were fed, there was no effect on intake of the treated straws. Mean live-weight gains were 51·4, 80·2 and 77·3 g/day on treatments 0, CSM and B respectively (P < 0·01). This was associated with higher intakes of ME (P < 0·01) which accounted for 73% of the variation in live-weight gains. Mean clean wool growth was 7·6, 10·5 and 9·3 g/day on treatments 0, CSM and B respectively (P < 0·01). This effect was associated more with nitrogen (N) absorption than with ME intake (80 and 48% of the variation in wool growth respectively).

It was concluded that the treated straws provided sufficient nutrients for modest growth in young sheep, that the supplements had no effect on intake of the treated straws and that additional live-weight gain and wool growth obtained by feeding CSM and B were associated with energy intake and nitrogen absorbed respectively.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 108 , Issue 1 , February 1987 , pp. 211 - 219
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Amaning-Kwarteng, K., Kellaway, R. C. & Kirby, A. C. (1986). Supplemental protein degradation, bacterial protein synthesis and nitrogen retention in sheep eating NaOH-treated straw. British Journal of Nutrition 55, 557–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, A. W. & Anderson, J. F. (1980). On finding a use for straw. In Utilization and Recycle of Agricultural Wastes and Residues (ed. Shuler, M. L.), pp. 237–272. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, G. W. (1981). Grazing behaviour. In Grazing Animals (ed. Morley, F. H. W.), pp. 79–104. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Brown, L. E. & Johnson, W. L. (1985). Intake and digestibility of wheat straw diets by goats and sheep. Journal of Animal Science 60, 1318–1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaney, A. L. & Marbach, E. P. (1962). Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clinical Chemistry 8, 130–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cochrane, M. J. & Valentine, S. V. (1978). Fodder Conservation, pp. 1–6. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries Publication. Adelaide: South Australia.Google Scholar
Coombe, J. B., Dinius, D. A., Goering, H. K. & Oltjen, R. R. (1979). Wheat straw-urea diets for beef steers: alkali treatment and supplementation with protein, monensin and a feed intake supplement. Journal of Animal Science 48, 1223–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombe, J. B., Mulholland, J. G. & Forrester, R. I. (1985). Effect of treatment with sodium hydroxide on the feeding of oat and rape straw for sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 36, 623–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coxworth, E., Kernan, J., Knipfel, J., Thorlacius, O. & Crowle, L. (1981). Review: crop residues and forages in western Canada; potential for feed use either with or without chemical or physical processing. Agricultural Environment 6, 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crabtree, J. R. & Williams, G. L. (1971). The voluntary intake and utilization of roughage-concentrate diets by sheep. I. Concentrate supplements for hay and straw. Animal Production 13, 71–82.Google Scholar
Egan, A. R. (1965). Nutritional status and intake regulation in sheep. II. The influence of sustained duodenal infusions of casein or urea upon voluntary intake of low-protein roughages by sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 16, 451–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, R. C. & Topps, J. H. (1963). Voluntary intake of low protein diets by sheep. Animal Production 5, 269–276.Google Scholar
Goering, H. K. & Van Soest, P. J. (1970). Forage Fibre Analyses. Agricultural Handbook No. 379. Washington DC: Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Horton, G. M. J. & Steacy, G. M. (1979). Effect of anhydrous ammonia treatment on the intake and digestibility of cereal straws by steers. Journal of Animal Science 48, 1239–1249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hungate, R. E. (1966). The Rumen and its Microbes. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hynd, P. I. & Allden, W. G. (1985). Rumen fermentation pattern, postruminal protein flow and wool growth rate of sheep on a high-barley diet. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 36, 451–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M. G. (1977). Review article: the alkali treatment of straws. Animal Feed Science and Technology 2, 105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M. G. (1978). Treating straw for animal feeding. An assessment of its technical and economic feasibility. Animal Production and Health Paper 10, pp. 1–81. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.Google Scholar
Kellaway, R. C., Crofts, F. C., Thiago, L. R. L., Redman, R. G. & Liebholz, J. M. L. (1978). A new technique for upgrading the nutritive value of roughages under field conditions. Animal Feed Science and Technology 3, 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellaway, R. C., & Leibholz, J. (1983). Effects of nitrogen supplements on intake and utilization of low-quality forages. World Animal Review 48, 33–37.Google Scholar
Kempton, T. J. & Leng, R. A. (1979). Protein nutrition of growing lambs. I. Responses in growth and rumen function to supplementation of a low protein-cellulose diet with either urea, casein or formaldehyde treated casein. British Journal of Nutrition 42, 289–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempton, T. J., Smith, G. H. & Leng, R. A. (1978). The relationship between growth and glucose availability in sheep and cattle. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 12, 139 (abstract).Google Scholar
Laredo, M. A. & Minson, D. J. (1973). The voluntary intake, digestibility and retention time by sheep of leaf and stem fractions of five grasses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 24, 875–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, P., Edwards, R. A. & Greenhaloh, J. F. D. (1981). Animal Nutrition, 3rd edn, pp. 385–387. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Mathers, J. C. & Miller, E. L. (1981). Quantitative studies of food protein degradation and the energetic efficiency of microbial protein synthesis in the rumen of sheep given chopped lucerne and rolled barley. British Journal of Nutrition 45, 587–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1975). Energy Allowances and Feeding Systems For Ruminants. Technical Bulletin 33. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Minson, D. J. (1971). The digestibility and voluntary intake of six Panicum varieties. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 11, 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minson, D. J. (1972). The digestibility and voluntary intake by sheep of six tropical grasses. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 12, 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulholland, J. G., Coombe, J. B. & McManus, W. R. (1974). Intake and liveweight response of sheep fed three ground and pelleted cereal straws. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 14, 449–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulholland, J. G., Coombe, J. B. & McManus, W. R. (1976). Effect of starch on the utilization by sheep of a straw diet supplemented with urea and minerals. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 27, 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. (1982). Protein Nutrition in Ruminants, pp. 40–84. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pearce, G. R., Beard, J. & Hilliard, E. P. (1979). Variability in the chemical composition of cereai straws and in vitro digestibility with and without sodium hydroxide treatment. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 19, 350–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redman, R. G., Kellaway, R. C. & Leibholz, J. (1980). Utilization of low quality roughages: effects of urea and protein supplements of differing solubility on digesta flows, intake and growth of cattle eating oaten chaff. British Journal of Nutrition 44, 343–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reis, P. J. & Schinckel, P. G. (1961). Nitrogen utilization and wool production by sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 12, 335–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxena, S. K., Otterby, D. E., Donker, J. D. & Good, A. L. (1971). Effects of feeding alkali-treated oat straw supplemented with soyabean meal or non-protein nitrogen on growth of lambs and on certain blood and rumen liquor parameters. Journal of Animal Science 33, 485–490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sriskandarajah, N. & Kellaway, R. C. (1982). Utilization of low quality roughage: effects of alkali treatment of wheat straw on intake by and growth rate of cattle, with and without a supplement of cotton-seed meal. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 99, 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H. (1980). Principles and Procedures of Statistics, 2nd edn.New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
Thiago, L. R. L. & Kellaway, R. C. (1982). Botanical composition and extent of lignification affecting digestibility of wheat and oat straw and paspalum hay. Animal Feed Science and Technology 7, 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trenkle, A. H. (1980). Amino acid metabolism and hormonal control during growth. In Digestive Physiology and Metabolism in Ruminants (ed. Ruckebusch, Y. and Thivend, R.), pp. 505–522. Lancaster: MTP Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weichselbaum, T. E. (1946). An accurate and rapid method for the determination of proteins in small amounts of blood serum and plasma. American Journal of Clinical Pathology Technical Supplement 10, 40–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weston, R. H. (1979). Feed intake regulation in the sheep. In Physiological and Environmental Limitations to Wool Growth (ed. Black, J. L. and Reis, P. J.), pp. 163–177. Armidale: The University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Whitelaw, F. G., Eadie, J. M., Bruce, L. A. & Shand, W. J. (1984). Microbial protein synthesis in cattle given roughage-concentrate and all-concentrate diets: the use of 2, 6-diaminopimelic acid, 2-amino-ethylphosphonic acid and 35S as markers. British Journal of Nutrition 52, 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, P. N. & Brigstocke, T. D. A. (1977). The commercial straw process. Process Biochemistry 12, 17–21.Google Scholar