Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T11:02:04.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The measurement of electrical conductivity of aqueous soil suspension and its use in soil fertility studies1(With Five Text-figure.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Ashutosh Sen
Ashutosh Sen
Affiliation:
Formerly of Soil Physics Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Several factors affecting the electrical conductivity of soil suspensions have been studied leading to the development of a simple and rapid technique for its measurement, and suitable for both moist and air-dry soils.

The possible use of the method in soil fertility studies necessitated examination of the effects of cultivations, manures, crop, meteorological variations, etc., on the conductivity measurements. This involved periodical determinations of initial conductivity (i.e. the specific conductivity of a 1 to 5 aqueous soil suspension determined at 25° C.) and the 7 days’ increase (i.e. the rise in specific conductivity of the same aqueous suspension after standing for 7 days in a thermostat at 25° C.). Soil samples were examined from several Rothamsted classical and nonclassical plots (over twenty plots were investigated for 15–20 months), and samples from experiments were also utilised during two growing seasons.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , January 1932 , pp. 212 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1932

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Atkins, W. R. G.J. Agric. Sci. (1924), 14, 198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Ballenegger, R. Abstract in Expt. Stat. Rec. (1914), 30, 516.Google Scholar
(3)Benade, W.Z. Pflanz. Düng. (1928), 12A, 293.Google Scholar
(4)Bouyoucos, G. J.Science (1926), 64, 651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Bouyoucos, G. J. and McCool, M. M.Mich. Agri. Tech. (1919), Bull. 44.Google Scholar
(6)Burd, J. S.J. Agric. Res. (1919), 18, 51.Google Scholar
(7)Burgess, P. S.Soil Sci. (1922), 14, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Conn, J. J.N.Y. Agric. Expt. Stat. Tech. (1914), Bull. 35.Google Scholar
(9)Cutler, D. W., Crump, L. M. and Sandon, H.Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. (1922), B, 211, 317.Google Scholar
(10)Doryland, C. J. T.North Dakota Expt. Stat. (1916), Bull. 116.Google Scholar
(11)Fisher, R. A.Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, 1928.Google Scholar
(12)Follett-Smith, R. R.Min. and Proc. of the Froghopper Invest. Committee (1928), 2, part 13, 145.Google Scholar
(13)Fred, E. B. and Hart, E. B.Wis. Agric. Expt. Stat. Res. (1915), Bull. 35. Also Centrlbl. Bakt. II (1916), 45, 379.Google Scholar
(14)Greaves, J. E.Soil Sci. (1916), 2, 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(15)Greaves, J. E. and Associates. J. Agric. Res. (1918), 16, 107.Google Scholar
(16)Greaves, J. E. and Associates. J. Agric. Res. (1917), 9, 293.Google Scholar
(17)Gustafson, A. E.Soil Sci. (1922), 13, 173.Google Scholar
(18)Hoagland, D. R.J. Agric. Res. (1918), 12, 369.Google Scholar
(19)Joseph, A. F.Reports of the Sudan Government Chemist (1921–1923).Google Scholar
(20)Kelly, W. P.Hawaii Agric. Expt. Stat. (1915), Bull. 37.Google Scholar
(21)König, J. and Co-workers. Landw. Vers. Stat. (1913), 79 80, 491.Google Scholar
(22)Lebedjantzev, A. N.Soil Sci. (1924), 18, 419.Google Scholar
(23)Lockhead, A. G.Trans. Roy. Soc. Canada (1924), 18, 75.Google Scholar
(24)Mosseri, V.Internat. Soc. Soil Sci. (1924).Google Scholar
(25)Nitzch, W.Fortschritte der Landwirtschaft (1921), Jahrg. 2, 283.Google Scholar
(26)Pantanelli, E.Centrlbl. Bakt. II (1914), 42, 439.Google Scholar
(27)Parsons, L. B. and Co-workers. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. (1929), 51, 166.Google Scholar
(28)Prescott, J. A.J. Agric. Sci. (1919), 9, 216; (1920), 10, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(29)Rahn, O.Centrlbl. Bakt. II (1908), 20, 38.Google Scholar
(30)Sen, A. T.Mem. Dept. Agric. India, Chem. series (1928), 9, No. 8, 249.Google Scholar
(31)Sen, A. T.Mem. Dept. Agric. India, Chem. series (1930), 10, No. 9.Google Scholar
(32)Sen, A. T. and Wright, C. H.J. Agric. Sci. (1931), 21, 1.Google Scholar
(33)Starkey, R. L.Soil Sci. (1929), 27, 319.Google Scholar
(34)Stewart, G. R.J. Agric. Res. (1918), 12, 311.Google Scholar
(35)Stewart, G. R. and Martin, J. C.J. Agric. Res. (1921), 20, 663.Google Scholar
(36)Thornton, H. G.Ann. App. Biol. (1922), 9, 241.Google Scholar
(37)Vanderleck, J.Trans. Roy. Soc. Canada (Ser. III and IV) (1918), 11, 15; (1918), 12, 1.Google Scholar
(38)Waksman, S. A.Principles of soil Microbiology (1927), p. 33. Baillière, Tindall and Cox, London.Google Scholar
(39)Waksman, S. A. and Starkey, R. L.Soil Sci. (1923), 16, 247.Google Scholar
(40)Waksman, S. A.Soil Sci. (1924), 17, 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(41)Wright, C. H.J. Agric. Sci. (1928), 18, 186.Google Scholar