Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-tmfhh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T00:15:29.553Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Moisture use characteristics of sugarcane genotypes under different available soil moisture regimes in alluvial entisols

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. L. Yadav
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow – 226002, India
S. R. Prasad
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow – 226002, India

Summary

To study the response of three sugarcane genotypes (CO 1148, COJ 64 and CO 1158) to variations in moisture availability in sandy loam soil (entisol), field trials were conductedat Lucknow (26·5° N, 80·5° E, 120 m altitude) during 1984–5 and 1985–6. Three moisture regimes, i.e. wet (irrigation at 75% available soil moisture (ASM)), moist (irrigation at 50% ASM) and dry (irrigation at 25% ASM) were maintained during the pre-monsoon (before June) period in spring-planted (February-March) sugarcane. During the summer months (until June)the variety CO 1148 had a significantly greater sheath moisture percentage than COJ 64 and CO 1158. Under stress conditions, leaf area index was reduced most in COJ 64 and least in CO 1148.Underground shoots and roots grew faster in CO 1148, and the growth of above-ground parts was quicker in COJ 64. Compared with the 75% ASM regime the reduction in cane yield in the 25% regime was more in COJ 64 and CO 1158 (31 t/ha) than in CO 1148 (12 t/ha). The water requirement of COJ 64 was greater than that of the other varieties. Therefore, for higheryields COJ 64 needed frequent irrigation whereas CO 1148 performed well even under moderate irrigation (50% ASM).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dastane, N. G. (1967). A Practical Manual for Water Use Research, pp. 23. Poona, India: Navbharat Prakashan.Google Scholar
Gahlot, K. N. S. (1958). Studies on drought tolerance in sugarcane in relation to cane yield. Proceedings of the Sugar Technologists Association of India, Kanpur 26, 93101.Google Scholar
Gascho, G. J. (1985). Water-sugarcane relationship. Sugar Journal 48 (6), 1117.Google Scholar
Gill, H. S. & Singh, H. (1959). Studies on physiological basis of drought resistance in sugarcane. Indian Journal of Sugarcane Research and Development 4, 1421.Google Scholar
Gosnell, J. M. (1968). Some effects of increasing age on sugarcane growth. Proceedings of the XIII Congress of the International Society of Sugarcane Technologists, Taiwan, pp. 409513.Google Scholar
Michael, A. M. (1978). Irrigation, Theory and Practice, pp.519520. New Delhi, India: Vikas Publishing House Private Limited.Google Scholar
Parashar, K. S., Hukkeri, S. B., Sadaphal, M. N. & Sharma, R. P. (1980). Studies on the effect of soil water stress and levels of nitrogen on spring planted sugarcane. Proceedings of the X VII Congress of the International Society of Sugarcane Technologists, Philippines, pp.494503.Google Scholar
Singh, S. & Reddy, M. S. (1980). Growth, yield and juice quality performance of sugarcane varieties under different soil moisture regimes in relation todrought resistance. Proceedings of the XVII Congress of the International Society of Sugarcane Technologists, Philippines, pp. 541555.Google Scholar
Singh, K. & Singh, B. (1985). Organising research based development programme in sugarcane. Indian Sugar Crops Journal 9, 1—4.Google Scholar
C., Srivastava. S. & Ghosh, A. K. (1970). The pattern of sugarcane root development and its implications in fertilization. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 18, 117119.Google Scholar
Verma, H. P. (1963), Some observation on water requirement of sugarcane. Biochemical Journal 30, 457583.Google Scholar
Yadav, R. L. & Sharma, R. K. (1980). Dry matter and N accumulation pattern of early, midlate and late varieties of sugarcane as influenced by rates of N applications. Indian Journal of Agronomy 25 (2), 201–208.Google Scholar