Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:33:32.358Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Motility and survival of spermatozoa in mixed semen from different bulls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. M. Dott  and
A. Walton
H. M. Dott
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Unit of Reproductive Physiology and Biochemistry, Animal Research Station, University of Cambridge
A. Walton
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Unit of Reproductive Physiology and Biochemistry, Animal Research Station, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Semen samples of five Dexter bulls were mixed and the effects of mixture on the live/dead ratio, the percentage of abnormal cells and on motility and survival of motility as measured by impedance change frequency were studied. Altogether fifty-six samples and mixtures were examined. No effect of mixture on live/dead ratio nor on percentage abnormals was found, but mixtures of semen had a motility which was slightly nearer the value of the less active component of the mixture than that of the means of both components. No explanation for this effect is offered.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , May 1958 , pp. 267 - 272
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beatty, R. A. (1956). Nature, Lond., 178, 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, R. A. (1957). J. Genet. (in the Press).Google Scholar
Bishop, M. W. H., Campbell, R. C., Hancock, L. J. & Walton, A. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 44, 227.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. C. & Jaffe, W. P. (1958). J. Agric. Sci. 50, 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dott, H. M. & Walton, A. (1953). J. Physiol. 122, 1P.Google Scholar
Dott, H. M. & Walton, A. (1956). J. Physiol. 133, 30P.Google Scholar
Frappel, J. P. & Williams, G. (1956). Proc. 3rd Int. Congr. Anim. Reprod., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. L. (1951). Nature, Lond., 167, 323.Google Scholar
Hess, E. A., Ludwick, T., Rickard, H. C. & Fordyce, E. (1954). J. Dairy Sci. 37, 649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kušneb, H. F. (1954). Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSSR. (Ser. Biol.), no. 1, 32.Google Scholar
Rothschild, Lord (1949). Nature, Lond., 163, 358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar