Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T19:53:10.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Note on the action of hydrogen peroxide on farmyard manure in different stages of decomposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. H. Gethin Jones
Affiliation:
Harper-Adams Agricultural College, Newport, Salop, formerly University College of N. Wales, Bangor.

Extract

G. W. Robinson and J. O. Jones (1) have shown that humified can be distinguished from non-humified organic matter by the use of 6 per cent, hydrogen peroxide. Humified organic matter is apparently oxidizedor rendered soluble by this reagent, whilst structural organic matter is unattacked. It seems reasonable to suppose that a similar distinction might be made in the case of farmyard manure between the amorphous decomposed material and the unaltered fibre of the faeces and litter. In other words, the degree of decomposition of farmyard manure might be determined by a method similar to that suggested for the degree of humification of soil organic matter. It is recognised that farmyard manure differs somewhat from soil organic matter in that the former includes the naturally soluble constituents of the litter, faeces and urine, which are either oxidized completely or rendered soluble in the peroxide treatment. However, they may be regarded as analogous in that both have undergone putrefactive decomposition. In the present paper, humification is used as a convenient term for the processes whereby organic matter is changed to structureless colloidal material and not as implying their exact correspondence with humification in the soil.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1927

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCE

(1)Robinson, G. W. and Jones, J. O. (1925). Journ. Agric. Sci. 15, 2629.Google Scholar