Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T17:03:01.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutrient cycling and losses based on a mass-balance model in grazed pastures receiving long-term superphosphate applications in New Zealand: 2. Sulphur

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. L. Nguyen  and
K. M. Goh
M. L. Nguyen
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand
K. M. Goh
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Sulphur (S) cycling and losses in irrigated, sheep-grazed pastures receiving annual superphosphate (SP) applications for 35 years at rates of 0, 188 and 376 kg/ha were studied using a mass-balance approach which accounted both for S inputs to and outputs from the soil-plant-animal system. Total recoveries of applied S in the 188 and 376 kg SP/ha treatments were estimated to be 35·2 and 21·2% respectively. Over 65·0% of the applied S was not recovered, and this was attributed to leaching losses beyond the major rooting zone (0–300 mm), lateral S transfer by irrigation water and cxcretal S transfer to stock camps. The lower S recovery in the 376 compared with the 188 kg/ha per year treatment was probably due to a higher accumulation of soil phosphorus (P), which might have competed with sulphate (SO42-) for adsorption sites on soil colloids. Superphosphate applications resulted in the accumulation of soil organic S (S0) fractions (hydriodic acid-reducible and carbonbonded S) to a soil depth of 300 mm in both camp and non-camp areas. However, an increase in SP applications from 188 to 376 kg/ha per year did not lead to a further accumulation of soil S0 fractions. Approximately 50% of this additional S input was estimated to be leached beyond the 300 mm depth. The presence of soil So fractions at 300 mm soil depth, especially in camp areas, suggests that leaching occurred, involving not only SO42- but also So fractions from soil, plant litter, root residues and animal excreta, as the soil had a low SO42- retention capacity. These leaching losses may limit the ability of soil S reserves to sustain adequate S for pasture production when S fertilizer application is withheld.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 119 , Issue 1 , August 1992 , pp. 107 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrow, N. J. (1961). Mineralisation of nitrogen and sulphur from sheep faeces. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 12, 644–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrow, N. J. (1967). Studies on the adsorption of sulphate by soils. Soil Science 104, 342–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrow, N. J. & Lambourne, L. J. (1962). Partition of excreted nitrogen, sulphur and phosphorus between the faeces and urine of sheep being fed pasture. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 13, 461–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, P. R. & Hume, L. D. (1971). Sulphur metabolism and excretion studies in ruminants. 4. Cystine and sulphate effects upon the flow of sulphate from the rumen and upon sulphur excretion by sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 22, 443–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolan, N. S., Syers, J. K., Tillman, R. W. & Scotter, D. R. (1988). Effect of liming and phosphate additions on sulphate leaching in soils. Journal of Soil Science 39, 493–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolan, N. S., White, R. E. & Hedley, M. J. (1990). A review of the use of phosphate rocks as fertilizers for direct application in Australia and New Zealand. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 30, 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boswell, C. C. (1983). An assessment of phosphorus and sulphur interactions on aspects of the sulphur cycle in pasture. Ph D thesis, University of New England, Australia.Google Scholar
Clark, F. E., Cole, C. V. & Bowman, R. A. (1980). Nutrient cycling. In Grasslands, Systems Analysis and Man. International Biological Programme 19 (Eds Breymeyer, A. I. & Van Dyne, G. M.), pp. 659–712. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Close, M. E. & Woods, P. H. (1986). Leaching losses from irrigated pasture: Waiau Irrigation Scheme, North Canterbury, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 29, 339–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornforth, I. S. (1984). Plant analysis. In Fertilizer Recommendations for Pastures and Crops in New Zealand(2nd edn) (Eds Cornforth, I. S. & Sinclair, A. G.), pp. 40–42. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture & Fisheries.Google Scholar
Doyle, P. T. & Moir, R. J. (1979). Sulphur and methionine metabolism in sheep. III. Excretion and retention of dietary and supplemented sulphur, and production responses to intraruminal infusions of DL-methionine. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 30, 1185–1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
During, C. (1984). Fertilizers and Soils in New Zealand Farming (3rd edn). Wellington, New Zealand: P. D. Hasselberg, Government Printer.Google Scholar
Fieldes, M. (1968). General Survey of the Soils of South Island, New Zealand. Soil Bureau Bulletin 27. New Zealand Department of Scientific & Industrial Research, Wellington.Google Scholar
Freney, J. R. (1986). Forms and reactions of organic sulphur compounds in soils. In Sulphur in Agriculture (Ed. Tabatabai, M. A.), pp. 297–232. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy, Agronomy Monograph Number 27.Google Scholar
Freney, J. R., Melville, G. E. & Williams, C. H. (1969). Extraction, chemical nature and properties of soil organic sulphur. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 20, 440–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genstat 5 Committee (1987). Genstat 5 Reference Manual. Statistics Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden. Hertfordshire. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Goodrich, R. D. & Garrett, J. E. (1986). Sulphur in livestock nutrition. In Sulphur in Agriculture (Ed. Tabatabai, M. A.), pp. 618–633. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy, Agronomy Monograph Number 27.Google Scholar
Grace, N. D. (1983). Sulphur. In The Mineral Requirements of Grazing Ruminants, pp. 67–70. Hamilton, New Zealand: New Zealand Society of Animal Production Occasional Publication No. 9.Google Scholar
Gregg, P. E. H. & Goh, K. M. (1979). Field studies with radioactive sulphur-labelled gypsum fertilizer. II. Climate and management factors affecting the movement of fertilizer sulphur in soils. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 22, 421–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilder, E. J. (1964). The distribution of plant nutrients by sheep at pasture. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 5, 241–248.Google Scholar
Hilder, E. J. (1966). Distribution of excreta by sheep at pasture. In Proceedings of the X International Grassland Congress, pp. 977–981. Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. M. & Nishita, H. (1952). Microestimation of sulphur in plant materials, soils and irrigation waters. Analytical Chemistry 24, 736–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlovsky, J. (1981). Cycling of nutrients and their utilisation by plants in agricultural ecosystems. Agro-Ecosystems 7, 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, P. M. & Siebert, B. D. (1972). The utilisation of spear grass (Heteropogon contortus). III. The influence of the level of dietary sulphur on the utilisation of spear grass by sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, A. P. & Till, A. R. (1981). The distribution in soil and plant of 35S from sheep excreta. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 32, 339–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlands, J. P. & Sutherland, H. A. M. (1973). Sulphur as a nutrient for Merino sheep. I. Storage of sulphur in tissues and wool, and its secretion in milk. British Journal of Nutrition 30, 529–535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, R., Blakemore, L. D., Gibson, E. J. & Daly, B. K. (1981). Effect of extraction time and charcoal treatment on the adsorbed sulphate values of several New Zealand topsoils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 12, 1195–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. C., Clarke, A. L. & Hall, W. B. (1987). Accumulation of plant nutrients and changes in soil properties of sandy soils under fertilised pasture in South-Eastern South Australia. II. Total sulphur and nitrogen, organic carbon and pH. Australian Journal of Soil Research 25, 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacRae, R. J., Hill, S. B., Mehuys, G. R. & Henning, J. (1990). Farm-scale agronomic and economic conversion from conventional to sustainable agriculture. Advances in Agronomy 43, 155–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLachlan, K. D. (1975). Sulphur in Australasian Agriculture. Sydney, Australia: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
Middleton, K. R. & Smith, G. S. (1978). The concept of a climax in relation to the fertilizer input of a pastoral ecosystem. Plant and Soil 50, 596–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New Zealand Agricultural Statistics (1990). In Situation and Outlook for New Zealand Agriculture 1990, pp. 80–98. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries.Google Scholar
Nguyen, M. L. (1990). Sulphur cycling in soil-plant-animal systems under grazed, irrigated pastures in Canterbury, New Zealand and its implication on pasture sulphur requirements. Ph D thesis, Lincoln University.Google Scholar
Nguyen, M. L. & Goh, K. M. (1990). Accumulation of soil sulphur fractions in grazed pastures receiving long-term superphosphate applications. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 33, 111–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, M. L. & Goh, K. M. (1992). Nutrient cycling and losses based on a mass-balance model in grazed pastures receiving long-term superphosphate applications in New Zealand. 1. Phosphorus. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 119, 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, M. L., Rickard, D. S. & McBride, S. D. (1989). Pasture production and changes in phosphorus and sulphur status in irrigated pastures receiving long-term applications of superphosphate fertilizer. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 32, 245–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quin, B. F. & Woods, P. H. (1978). Surface irrigation of pasture with treated sewage effluent. 1. Nutrient status of soil and pasture. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 21, 419–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowarth, J. S., Gillingham, A. G., Tillman, R. W. & Syers, J. K. (1985). Release of phosphorus from sheep faeces on grazed, hill country pastures. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 28, 497–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saggar, S., Hedley, M. J., Gillingham, A. C., Rowarth, J. S., Richardson, S., Bolan, N. S. & Gregg, P. E. H. (1990 a).Predicting the fate of fertilizer sulphur in grazed hill country pastures by modelling the transfer and accumulation of soil phosphorus. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 33, 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saggar, S., MacKay, A. D., Hedley, M. J., Lambert, M. G. & Clark, D. A. (1990 b). A nutrient transfer model to explain the fate of phosphorus and sulphur in a grazed hill-country pasture. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 30, 295–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schindler, S. C. & Mitchell, M. J. (1987). Dynamics of: lr'S horizons and leachates from a hardwood forest podsol. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 19, 531–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoenau, J. J. & Bettany, J. R. (1987). Organic matter leaching as a component of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulphur cycles in a forest, grassland, and gleyed soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 51, 646–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, A. G. (1982). Soilsand fertilizers. Sulphur sulphate leaching index. Aglink 1/3000/2/82. FPP652. Wellington, New Zealand: Media Services, New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries.Google Scholar
Sinclair, A. G. (1983). Problems in modelling sulphur requirements in New Zealand pastures. In Proceedings of the Technical Workshop on Sulphur in New Zealand Agriculture, Massev University, Palmerston North, 23 and 24 May 1983 (Eds Gregg, P. E. H. & Syers, J. K.), pp. 106–117. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Department of Soil Science Occasional Report No. 4, Massey University.Google Scholar
Sinclair, A. G. & Enright, P. D. (1982). An ‘autoanalyser’ method for the determination of extractabic soil sulphate using automated purification of extracts. New Zealand Journal of Science 25, 141–146.Google Scholar
Sinclair, A. G. & Saunders, W. M. H. (1984). Pasture maintenance, sulphur. In Fertilizer Recommendations for Pastures and Crops in New Zealand (2nd edn) (Eds Cornforth, I. S. & Sinclair, A. G.), pp. 15–17. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture & Fisheries.Google Scholar
Smith, C. M., Gregg, P. E. H. & Tillman, R. W. (1983). Drainage losses of sulphur from a yellow-grey earth soil. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 363–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis System (1987). SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers, version 6. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Steinbergs, A., Iismaa, O., Freney, J. R. & Barrow, N. J. (1962). Determination of total sulphur in soil and plant material. Analytica Chimica Acta 27, 158–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syers, J. K. & Springett, J. A. (1984). Earthworms and soil fertility. Plant and Soil 76, 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Till, A. R. (1975). Sulphur cycling in grazed pastures. In Sulphur in Australasian Agriculture (Ed. McLachlan, K. D.), pp. 68–75. Sydney, Australia: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
Till, A. R. (1979). Nutrient cycling. In Grassland Ecosystems of the World: Analysis of Grasslands and their Uses. International Biological Programme 18 (Ed. Coupland, R. T.), pp. 277–285. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Till, A. R., Blair, G. J. & Dalal, R. C. (1982). Isotopic studies of the recycling of carbon, nitrogen, sulphur and phosphorus from plant material. In The Cycling of Carbon, Nitrogen, Sulphur, and Phosphorus in Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecosystems (Eds Freney, J. R. & Galbally, I. E.), pp. 51–59. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Till, A. R., Saunders, W. M. H. & Sinclair, A. G. (1987). Plant nutrient sulphur requirements: Oceania. In Sulphur 87. World Regional Requirements. Plant Nutrient Sulphur, pp. 63–73. Houston, Texas: co-sponsored by the Sulphur Institute and the British Sulphur Corporation.Google Scholar
Tillman, R. W. (1983). Cycling of sulphur in soil-plantanimal systems: an overview. In Proceedings of the Technical Workshop on Sulphur in New Zealand Agriculture, Massey University, Palmerston North, 23 and 24 May 1983 (Eds Gregg, P. E. H. & Syers, J. K.), pp. 5–8. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Department of Soil Science Occasional Report No. 4, Massey University.Google Scholar
United States National Research Council (1989). Alternative Agriculture. Committee on the Role of Alternative Farming Methods in Modern Production Agricullure, Board on Agriculture, National Research Council. National Academy of Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar