Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T03:30:39.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The nutritive value of Calluna vulgaris II. A preliminary study of digestibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. G. Armstrong  and
Brynmor Thomas
D. G. Armstrong
Affiliation:
King's College (Newcastle upon Tyne), University of Durham
Brynmor Thomas
Affiliation:
King's College (Newcastle upon Tyne), University of Durham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Earlier work on the digestibility of Calluna vulgaris has been briefly reviewed.

2. Determination of the digestibility of heather has been made by two methods, viz. (a) the conventional procedure involving the use of metabolism crates and (b) the lignin-ratio technique applied to tethered sheep.

3. A diet consisting of heather alone, and fed in metabolism crates, proved unsatisfactory as a result of low feed intake. Agreement between duplicate sheep in respect of digestive capacity was also poor.

4. Satisfactory feed intakes were attained when heather was admixed at levels of 40 and 70% with hay. At both levels the digestibility of the organic matter was approximately the same, and agreement between sheep was good except for crude protein.

5. The lignin-ratio technique applied to tethered sheep gave digestibility coefficients for organic matter which were consistent with those obtained by the conventional method; the values for crude protein were somewhat higher. While the organic matter of 10-year-old heather was digested to about the same extent as that of 4-year-old heather, its crude protein digestibility was rather less.

6. The advantages and disadvantages of both methods have been discussed; it has been concluded that the lignin-ratio technique is likely to play a useful part in future work of this kind.

7. These preliminary results suggest that heather has a higher nutritive value than earlier work would indicate, and that even the winter foliage may compare favourably with hay of moderate to poor quality.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , April 1953 , pp. 223 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bergeim, O. (1926). J. Biol. Chem. 70, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, E. B., Duncan, C. W. & Huffman, C. F. (1940). J. Dairy Sci. 23, 953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, N. (1938). Husdjurens utfodring och vard, 6.Google Scholar
Homb, T. (1946). Norg. Landbrukshøisk. Beretn. For. Forsøk. 61, 48.Google Scholar
Honcamp, F. & Blanck, E. (1918). Landw. VersSta. 91.Google Scholar
Isaacken, H. & Ulvesli, O. (1933). Meld. Norg. Landbr Høisk. 13, 675.Google Scholar
Larsen, H. L. (1941). Haandbog i kuaegets Aul, Fodring og Pleje, 2.Google Scholar
Morgen, A., Beger, C. & Westhauser, F. (1914). Landw. VersSta. 85, 1.Google Scholar
Presthegge, K. (1943). Meld. Norg. LandbrHøisk. 23.Google Scholar
Thomas, B. & Armstrong, D. G. (1950). J. Agric. Sci. 39, 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, B. & Armstrong, D. G. (1952). Scot. Agric. (in the Press).Google Scholar
Thomas, B. & Armstrong, D. G. (1952). J. Agric. Sci. 42, 461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, B. & Ibbotson, C. F. (1947). J. Agric. Sci. 37, 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulvesli, O. & Nordbo, R. (1945). Tidssk. norske Landbruk. 52, 156.Google Scholar
Watson, S. J. & Horton, E. A. (1936). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 4, 25.Google Scholar