Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T09:31:06.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutritive value of pasture: I. Seasonal variations in the productivity, botanical and chemical composition, and nutritive value of medium pasturage on a light sandy soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Herbert Ernest Woodman ,
Denzil Layton Blunt  and
James Stewart
Herbert Ernest Woodman
Affiliation:
(The Institute for the Study of Animal Nutrition, School of Agriculture, Cambridge University.)
Denzil Layton Blunt
Affiliation:
(The Institute for the Study of Animal Nutrition, School of Agriculture, Cambridge University.)
James Stewart
Affiliation:
(The Institute for the Study of Animal Nutrition, School of Agriculture, Cambridge University.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

An account has been given of an investigation into the seasonal changes in the productivity, botanical and chemical composition, and nutritive value of pasture grass, the work constituting the initial stage of a comprehensive study of the nutritive properties of different types of pasture. The pasture on which the work was carried out was situated on a light sandy soil of low water-retaining capacity; the pasturage was of medium quality.

Grazing was imitated by the daily use of a motor-mowing machine, the system of cutting being such as to ensure the whole plot being cut over once per week. The season was divided into ten periods, each period corresponding with the duration of a digestion trial carried out on two wether sheep. The main feature of the weather conditions during the season was the extremely low rainfall during the period from early June to mid-July.

The pasture plot results were compared with corresponding results obtained from contiguous plots which were allowed to grow for hay, and from which, after removal of hay, several successive aftermath cuts were taken. The main findings of the investigation are summarised below:

Seasonal changes in the botanical composition of the herbage. Although precise and systematic botanical analyses of the herbage of the pasture were not carried out, yet careful surveys made at an early and a late date in the season, together with general observations made during the whole course of the experiment, enabled interesting conclusions to be drawn in respect of the seasonal activity and persistency of the different species of grasses in the sward. During the spring season, Bromus mollis, Lolium perenne, Poa annua and Poa trivialis accounted for almost 80 per cent, of the herbage.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , April 1926 , pp. 205 - 274
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Wood, T. B. (1924). Animal Nutrition (Clive, W. B., London).Google Scholar
(2)Somerville, (1911). Journ. Bd. of Agric. Supp. vol. 17, No. 10.Google Scholar
(3)Armstrong, (1907). Journ. Agric. Sci. 2, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Hall, and Russell, (1912). Journ. Agric. Sci. 4, 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Honcamp, Stau and Müllner, (1915). Versuchs-Stat. 87, 315.Google Scholar
(6)Stapledon, (1924). Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Aberystwyth, Series H, No. 3, p. 5.Google Scholar
(7)Fagan, and Jones, (1924). Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Aberystwyth, Series H, No. 3, p. 85.Google Scholar
(8)Williams, (1924). Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Aberystwyth, Series H, No. 3, p. 131.Google Scholar
(9)Williams, and Davies, (1924). Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Aberystwyth, Series H, No. 3, p. 151.Google Scholar
(10)Stapledon, Fagan and Williams, (1924). Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Aberystwyth, Series H, No. 3, p. 159.Google Scholar
(11)Elliott, Orr and Wood, (1926). Journ. Agric. Sci. 16, 59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Elliott, and Crichton, (1926). Journ. Agric. Sci. 16, p. 65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13)Godden, (1926). Journ. Agric. Sci. 16, p. 78Google Scholar
(14)Cruickshank, (1926). Journ. Agric. Sci. 16, p. 89Google Scholar
(15)Godden, (1926). Journ. Agric. Sci. 16, p. 98Google Scholar
(16)Sinclair, (1869). Hortus Gramineus Woburnensis.Google Scholar
(17)Blunt, (1924). Unpublished observations.Google Scholar
(18)Wood, and Woodman, (1921). Journ. Agric. Sci. 11, 304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(19)Honcamp, and Koch, (1920). Versuchs-Stat. 96, 45.Google Scholar
(20)Kellner, (1907). Ernähr. landw. Nutztiere.Google Scholar
(21)Wood, (1921). Rations for Livestock.Google Scholar
(22)Crowther, and Woodman, (1917). Journ. Agric. Sci. 8, 429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(23)Wood, and Woodman, (1924). Journ. Agric. Sci. 14, 498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(24)Woodman, (1925). Journ. Agric. Sci. 15, 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(25)Woodman, (1925). Journ. Agric. Sci. 15, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(26)Woodman, (1922). Journ. Agric. Sci. 12, 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(27)Armsby, and Moulton, (1925). The Animal as a Converter of Matter and Energy (Am. Chem. Soc. Monograph, N.Y.), p. 173.Google Scholar
(28)Richards, and Godden, (1924). The Analyst.Google Scholar
(29)Crowther, and Woodman, (1922). Journ. Agric. Sci. 12, 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(30)Weiske, and Wildt, (1873). Ztschr. f. Biol. 9, 541.Google Scholar
(31)Bunge, Proescher and Abderhalden, (1899). Ztschr. physiol. Chem. 27, 594.Google Scholar
(32)Weiske, (1880). Landw. Jahrb. 9, 290.Google Scholar