Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T14:27:54.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the changes in in sacco digestibility of urea ammoniated wheat straw during treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

B. Singh  and
H. P. S. Makkar
B. Singh
Affiliation:
Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Regional Station, Palampur (H.P.), India
H. P. S. Makkar
Affiliation:
Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Regional Station, Palampur (H.P.), India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The treatment of straw using ammonia released by the hydrolysis of urea and subsequent improvements obtained in digestibility of straws have been reported (Jayasuriya & Pearce, 1983; Williams, Innes & Brewer, 1984). Benefits achieved by this method compare well with those obtained by sodium hydroxide (Verma, 1983). Urea is widely and cheaply available in many developing countries; this favours its use in improving nutritive values of low quality roughages. In addition, this method is relatively safe, uncomplicated and inexpensive compared with some other chemical treatments. Considerable attention has been paid to the treatment conditions for treating cereal straws with liquid or anhydrous ammonia which lead to the optimum effects (Waagepetersen & Vestergaard Thomsen, 1977; Solaiman, Horn & Owen, 1979; Borhami & Sundstøl, 1982), but equivalent studies on the ammoniation of crop residues through urea are limited (Cloete & Kritzinger, 1984; Singh & Negi, 1985). No report is available on the changes in in sacco dry-matter digestibility (DMD) of urea ammoniated straw during treatment at different temperatures. This paper describes our observations on the changes in in sacco DMD of urea ammoniated wheat straw at different treatment times and temperatures.

Type
Short Notes
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 110 , Issue 2 , April 1988 , pp. 423 - 426
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borhami, B. E. A. & SundstøL, F. (1982). Studies on ammonia treated straw. 1. The effect of type and level of ammonia, moisture content and treatment time on the digestibility in vitro and enzyme soluble organic matter of oat straw. Animal Feed Science and Technology 7, 46–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cloete, S. W. P. & Kritzinger, N. M. (1984). A laboratory assessment of treatment conditions affecting the ammoniation of wheat straw by urea. 1. The effect of temperature, moisture level and treatment period. South African Journal of Animal Science 14, 55–58.Google Scholar
Gordon, A. H. & Chesson, A. (1983). The effect of prolonged storage on the digestibility and nitrogen content of ammonia treated barley straw. Animal Feed Science and Technology 8, 147–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harkin, J. M. (1973). Lignin. In Chemistry and Biochemistry of Herbage (ed. Butler, G. W. and Bailey, R. W.), pp. 323–373. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jayasuriya, M. C. N. & Pearce, G. R. (1983). The effect of urease enzyme on treatment time and the nutritive value of straw treated with ammonia as urea. Animal Feed Science and Technology 8, 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kernan, J. A. & Spurr, D. T. (1978). The effect of reaction conditions during ammoniation on the in vitro organic matter digestibility and the crude protein content of Neepawa wheat straw. C-78–14, vol. 2, Section 2C. Canada: Saskatchewan Research Council.Google Scholar
Makkar, H. P. S. & Singh, B. (1987). Kinetics of urea hydrolysis and binding of ammonia to wheat straw during ammoniation by urea. Journal of Dairy Science 70, 1313–1317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
øRskov, E. R., Hovell, F. D.DeB, . & Mould, F. (1980). The use of nylon bag technique for the evaluation of feedstuffs. Tropical Animal Production 5, 195–213.Google Scholar
Singh, B. & Neoi, S. S. (1985). Utilization of ammoniated wheat straw by sheep. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 2, 31–34.Google Scholar
Solaiman, S. G., Horn, G. W. & Owen, F. N. (1979). Ammonium hydroxide treatment of wheat straw. Journal of Animal Science 49, 802–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundstøl, F., Coxworth, E. & Mowat, D. N. (1978). Improving the nutritive value of straw and other low quality roughages by treatment with ammonia. World Animal Review 26, 13–21.Google Scholar
Verma, M. L. (1983). Practical aspects of treatment of crop residues. In The Utilization of Fibrous Agricultural Residues (ed. Pearce, G. R.), pp. 85–99. Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
Waagepetersen, J. & Vestergaard Thomson, K. (1977). Effect on digestibility and nitrogen content of barley straw of different ammonia treatments. Animal Feed Science and Technology 2, 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, P. E. V., Innes, G. M. & Brewer, A. (1984). Ammonia treatment of straw via the hydrolysis of urea. I. Effects of dry matter and urea concentrations on the rate of hydrolysis of urea. Animal Feed Science and Technology 11, 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar