Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-17T21:14:27.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the effect of environmental temperature and environment at moult on the heat production and energy requirements of hens and cockerels of a White Leghorn strain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. J. B. O'Neill  and
N. Jackson
S. J. B. O'Neill
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Queen's University, Belfast BT9 5PX, and Department of Agriculture, Northern Ireland
N. Jackson
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Queen's University, Belfast BT9 5PX, and Department of Agriculture, Northern Ireland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The heat production of hens and cockerels of a White Leghorn strain (‘H & N’) was measured after acclimation to environmental temperatures of 16, 23, 27 and 33 °C. No difference in fasting heat production was found between 16 and 23 °C for well-feathered hens in the first few months after moult though there were substantial reductions at 27 °C and above. Both hens and cockerels showed a trend of increasing net availability of metabolizable energy with increasing environmental temperature though this was non-significant. There were significant reductions between 16 and 27 °C in the metabolizable energy requirements for maintenance for both sexes.

Results are also given for the heat production of laying hens exposed to short daylight periods and high or low environmental temperatures. Although the mean fasting heat production of the high-temperature group was greater, the difference was not statistically significant.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 82 , Issue 3 , June 1974 , pp. 553 - 558
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aschoff, J. & Pohl, H. (1970). Rhythmic variations in energy metabolism. Federation Proceedings, Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology 29, 1541–52.Google ScholarPubMed
Coulombe, H. N. (1970). Physiological and physical aspects of temperature regulation in the burrowing owl Speotyto cunicularia. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 35, 307–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, J. S. (1962). Seasonal acclimatization in four species of small wild birds. Physiological Zoology 35, 224–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, J. C. D. (1954). Heat regulation in birds. In Progress in the Physiology of Farm Animals, vol. 1 (ed. Hammond, J.). London: Butterworth Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Kendeigh, S. C. (1934). The role of the environment in the life of birds. Ecological Monographs 4, 299–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, S. J. B., Baxnave, D. & Jackson, N. (1971). The influence of feathering and environmental temperature on the heat production and efficiency of utilization of metabolizable energy by the mature cockerel. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 77, 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, S. J. B. & Jackson, N. (1974). The heat production of hens and cockerels maintained for an extended period of time at a constant environmental temperature of 23 °C. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 82, 549–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riddle, O., Smith, G. C. & Benedict, F. G. (1934). Seasonal and temperature factors and their determination in pigeons of percentage metabolism change per degree of temperature change. American Journal of Physiology 107, 333–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, G. C. (1962). Responses ami adaptation of wild birds to environmental temperature. Comparative Physiology of Temperature Regulation, part 3 (ed. Hannon, J. P. and Vierech, E.). Arctic Aeromedical Laboratory, Port Wainwright, Alaska.Google Scholar