Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T14:38:38.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The partition of fat between depots and its distribution in the carcasses of water buffalo and Dutch Friesian cross-bred cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

O. Y. Abdallah ,
Karima A. Shahin  and
M. G. A. Latif
O. Y. Abdallah
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Shovbra El-Kheima, Cairo, Egypt
Karima A. Shahin
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Shovbra El-Kheima, Cairo, Egypt
M. G. A. Latif
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Shovbra El-Kheima, Cairo, Egypt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Dissection data from an experiment involving 12 buffalo, nine ♂Friesian × ♀Egyptian native Baladi (½ Friesian) and nine ♂ Friesian × ♀ ½ Friesian (¾ Friesian) bulls were used to examine the growth and partition of fat between depots and its distribution in different regions of the carcass.

Growth of total dissectible carcass fat (TCF) and its component depots (subcutaneous (SCF); intermuscular (IMF); kidney knob and channel (KKCF)) and total offal fat (TOF) and its component depots (caul (CF); mesenteric (MF); heart (HF)) relative to total body fat (TBF = TCF + TOF) was examined.

Relative to TBF, no significant differences in growth coefficients or adjusted means of TCF, TOF, carcass SCF and carcass KKCF were found between genotypes. Compared with ¾ Friesians, buffaloes had lower rates of deposition of CF and IMF, lower proportion of TBF deposited as MF and a greater proportion of HF.

As dissected side fat (DSF) increased, the proportion of fat decreased in the distal hind limb and neck, increased in the abdominal wall and adjacent ventral part of the thoracic cavity and remained unchanged in the other carcass regions. Fat growth coefficients differed between genotype groups in all carcass regions except the distal hind limb, fore limb and thorax. A posterior-anterior decrease in growth impetus of fat from the loin (b < 1) towards the neck (b > 1) was traced in buffaloes while the growth coefficients within all dorsal cuts in cattle did not differ significantly from 1. Compared with cattle, buffaloes had more of the DSF occurring in the combined expensive cuts with higher SCF: IMF ratio only at the upper limits of fatness considered in the present work.

It is argued that buffaloes relative to Friesian cross-breds have a beef-type fat partition and that characteristic changes in rates of increase in fat depots relative to empty-body weight and in fat in various regions relative to total fat could be related to the increase in Friesian blood.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 98 , Issue 3 , June 1982 , pp. 571 - 578
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abdallah, O. Y., Shahin, K. A. & Latif, M. G. A. (1981). Growth and development of water buffalo and Friesian cross-bred cattle, with special reference to body and carcass composition. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 97, 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdallah, O. Y., Shahin, K. A. & Latif, M. G. A. (1982 a). Growth and development of water buffalo and Friesian cross-bred cattle, with special reference to the ‘entire’ and ‘boneless’ cuts. Meat Science (in the Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdallah, O. Y., Shahin, K. A. & Latif, M. G. A. (1982 b). Growth and development of water buffalo and Friesian cross-bred cattle, with special reference to growth and distribution of carcass muscle and bone. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 98, 317–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béranger, C. & Robelin, J. (1977). Influence du mode d'élevage, de la sélection et de l'alimentation sur l'état d'engraissement des bovins. Annales de Biologie Animate, Biochimie, Biophysique 17, 905–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, R. T., Bech Andersen, B. & Liboriussen, T. (1978 a). Growth of bovine tissues. 1. Genetic influences on muscle growth and distribution in young bulls. Animal Production 27, 51–61.Google Scholar
Berg, R. T., Bech Andersen, B. & Liboriussen, T. (1978 b). Growth of bovine tissues. 3. Genetic influences on patterns of fat growth and distribution in young bulls. Animal Production 27, 63–69.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. (1965). The relationship of carcass measurements and dissection data to beef carcass composition. Research in Veterinary Science 6, 24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callow, E. H. (1962). Comparative studies of meat. VIII. The percentage of fat in the fatty and muscular tissues of steers and the iodine number of the extracted fat, as affected by breed and level of nutrition. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 58, 295–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, D. D. & Johnson, E. R. (1976). Breed differences in amount and distribution of bovine carcass dissectable fat. Journal of Animal Science 42, 332–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harte, F. J. & Conniffe, D. (1967). Studies on cattle of varying growth potential for beef production. II. Carcass composition and distribution of ‘lean meat’ fat and bone. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 6, 153–170.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J. (1980). Fat partition and distribution in cattle, sheep and pigs. Meat Science 5, 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Avis, P. R. & Smith, R. J. (1976). Fat distribution in steer carcasses of different breeds and crosses. 2. Distribution between joints. Animal Production 23, 223–232Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cuthbertson, A. & Harrington, G. (1976). Fat distribution in steer carcasses of different breeds and crosses. 1. Distribution between depots. Animal Production 23, 25–34.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cuthbertson, A. & Smith, R. J. (1976). Variation in lean distribution among steer carcasses of different breeds and crosses. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 533–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levie, A. (1963). The Meat Handbook. Connecticut: The Avi Publishing Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Murray, D. M., Tulloh, N. M. & Winter, H. W. (1974). Effects of three different growth rates on empty body weight, carcass weight and dissected carcass composition of cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 82, 535–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomeroy, R. W. & Williams, D. R. (1974). The partition of fat in the bovine carcass. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production (New Series) 3, 85 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Ragab, M. T., Darwish, M. Y. H. & Malek, A. G. A. (1966). Meat production from Egyptian buffaloes. II. Physical and chemical characteristics of buffalo meat. Journal of Animal Production, United Arab Republic 6, 31–50.Google Scholar
Royal Smithfield Club (1966). A comparison of the growth of different types of cattle for beef production. Report of Major Beef Research Project. Royal Smithfield Club, London.Google Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. (1973). The effect of body-weight loss on the composition of Brahman cross and Africander cross steers. II. Dissected components of the dressed carcass. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 80, 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, T. G., Lang, C. P. & Tulloh, N. M. (1976). A comparison of body composition and tissue distribution of Freisian and Angus steers. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar