Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T12:23:28.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prevention of mineral deficiency by soaking seed in nutrient solution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Winifred O. Roberts
Affiliation:
East Mailing Research Station, East Mailing, Kent

Summary

A method is described for economizing in the use of fertilizers on deficient soil by soaking the cereal seeds in nutrient solutions containing the deficient element at a sufficiently high concentration to supply a large part of the total requirements of the plants.

The result of greatest potential practical importance was obtained on oats. Soaking oats in molecular tribasic potassium phosphate brought about an increase in yield from 17 to 25 cwt./acre (46 %) on phosphate-deficient soil at the cost of 13·6 lb./acre of the potassium phosphate (or 4·6 lb. P2O6) without the addition of any phosphate to the soil. There was a correspondingly large increase in the weight of straw. Nearly 75% of the P2O5 introduced in this way was recovered from the harvested grain. Sodium phosphate appears equally efficaceous for oats. Strikingly beneficial effects were also obtained on barley and wheat.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bishop, L. K. (1944). J. Inst. Brew. 50 (XLI, N.S.), 166–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. J. (1907). Ann. Bot., Lond., 21, 7987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. J. (1909). Proc. Roy. Soc. B, 81, 8293.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1932). Ann. Bot., Lond., 46, 571–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. (1843). J. R. Agric. Soc. 4, 557.Google Scholar
Collins, E. F. (1918). Ann. Bot., Lond., 32, 381414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Digby, Sir Kenelm (1661). A Discourse Concerning the Vegetation of Plants. Second Treatise. (A discourse spoken at Gresham College on 23 Jan. 1660.)Google Scholar
Eberhart, C. (1907). Fühlings Landw. Ztg, 56, 159.Google Scholar
Gallagher, P. H. & Walsh, T. (1943). Proc. R. Irish Acad. 49. Sect. B, no. 11, 193200.Google Scholar
Gusev, E. P. (1940). Chemisation of Socialistic Agriculture, 5, 43–5.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, J. B. (1944). J. Soc. Chem. Ind., Lond., 63, no. 4.Google Scholar
Jones, M. G. & Tincker, M. A. H. (1926). Ann. Appl. Biol. 13, 535–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, F. (1914). Proc. Roy. Soc. B, 97, 609.Google Scholar
Kidd, F. & West, C. (1919). New Phytol. 18, 35–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knop, W. (1864). Landw. VersSta. 6, 81107.Google Scholar
Kotowski, F. (1927). Plant Physiol. 2, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, C. (1881). Wollny's Forschungen auf dem Oebiele der Agrikulturphysik, 4, 59.Google Scholar
Lysenko, & Stepanenko, (1934). Vernalization and Phasic Development of Plants. Published by Imp. Bureaux Plant Genetics, pp. 58–9.Google Scholar
Mercier, C. (1919a). Ctry Life, Lond., 44, 454–6.Google Scholar
Mercier, C. (1919b). A Manual of the Electro-chemical Treatment of Seed. Univ of London Press, Ltd.Google Scholar
Novikov, V. A. & Sadovskaja, (1939). C.R. Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S. 23, no.3.Google Scholar
Russell, E. J. (1920). J. Minist. Agric. 26, 971–81.Google Scholar
Sherman, G. D. & Harmer, P. M. (1941). J. Amer. Soc., Agron. 33, no. 12, 1080–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schleh, (1907). FüMings Landw. Ztg, 56, 33.Google Scholar
Smith, D. C. & Bressman, E. N. (1930). J. Agric. Res. 40, 1.Google Scholar
Tharp, W. H. (1936). Bot. Gaz. 97, 240–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tincker, M. A. H. (1925) Ann. Appl. Biol. 12, 440–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tstung Lě Loo, & Yü-Wei Tang, (1945). Amer. J. Bot. 32, no. 3, 106–14.Google Scholar
Wollny, E. (1885). Wollny's Forschungen auf dem Oebiete der Agrikulturphysik, 8, 380.Google Scholar