Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T17:25:10.994Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Results from an experiment on permanent grass evaluating aqueous ammonia and aqueous urea, injected in bands either 30 or 60 cm apart

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. Penny ,
F. V. Widdowson  and
J. Ashworth
A. Penny
Affiliation:
Roihamsted Experimental StationHarpenden, Herts. AL5 2JQ
F. V. Widdowson
Affiliation:
Roihamsted Experimental StationHarpenden, Herts. AL5 2JQ
J. Ashworth
Affiliation:
Roihamsted Experimental StationHarpenden, Herts. AL5 2JQ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The experiment was on permanent grass at Rothamsted from 1974–75. ‘Nitro-Chalk’ (ammonium nitrate-calcium carbonate mixture, 25% N) broadcast in equal amounts for each of three cuts was the standard treatment against which the following were compared: (1) prilled urea (46% N) broadcast like ‘Nitro-Chalk’, (2) aqueous ammonia (26% N) injected in winter in bands 10 cm deep and either 30 or 60 cm apart, and (3) aqueous urea (18% N) injected like the aqueous ammonia. All these fertilizers were applied to give 250 or 375 or 500 kg N/ha in 1974 and all were reapplied in 1975.

In 1974 yields were larger with ‘Nitro-Chalk’ or prilled urea than with the aqueous fertilizers. Aqueous urea gave slightly larger yields than aqueous ammonia. Yields with the aqueous fertilizers were slightly larger when the injector knives were spaced 60 instead of 30 cm apart. Distribution of yield over three cuts was more uniform with ‘Nitro-Chalk’ and prilled urea (divided between cuts) than with the aqueous fertilizers. Injecting the aqueous fertilizers in bands 60 instead of 30 cm apart improved yield distribution only a little. In 1975 yields were slightly larger with the aqueous fertilizers at the first cut, but not in the drought afterwards.

Relative yields over the 2 years (‘Nitro-Chalk’ = 100%) were: prilled urea, 97; aqueous urea in 60 cm bands, 96; aqueous urea in 30 cm bands, 95; aqueous ammonia in 60 cm bands, 92; aqueous ammonia in 30 cm bands, 90.

In 1974 the grass recovered most N from ‘Nitro-Chalk’ and least from aqueous ammonia, but more from aqueous than from prilled urea. Recovery of N from the aqueous fertilizers was larger when injected in bands 60 instead of 30 cm apart, especially when 250 or 375 kg N/ha was given. Little rain fell in summer 1975 and recoveries of N were smaller than in 1974. The grass recovered more of the injected than the broadcast N, but no more with the injector knives 60 instead of 30 cm apart.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 88 , Issue 2 , April 1977 , pp. 319 - 331
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anslow, R. C. & Green, J. O. (1967). The seasonal growth of pasture grasses. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 68, 109–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, J. (1973). On measuring nitrification and recovery of aqueous ammonia applied to grassland. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 81, 145–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, J. & Flint, R. C. (1974). Delayed nitrification and controlled recovery of aqueous ammonia injected under grass. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 83, 327–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasser, J. K. R. (1964). Fertiliser urea. World Crops, 03, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Gasser, J. K. R. & Ross, G. J. S. (1975). The distribution in the soil of aqueous ammonia injected under grass. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 26, 719–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkinson, D. S. & Powlson, D. S. (1976). The effects of biocidal treatments on soil. I. Fumigation with chloroform. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 8, 167–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, A. J. & Piper, F. J. (1970). The ammonification and nitrification in soil of urea with and without biuret. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 75, 301–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1975). Fertiliser use in farm type regions of England and Wales, 1974. ADAS Advisory Soil Scientists, Soil Analysis and Fertiliser Committee, report no. SS/SAF/17.Google Scholar
National College or Agricultural Engineering, Silsoe, Bedford (1970). Anhydrous ammonia. Proceedings of a Symposium on Aspects of its Teohnology and Use as a Fertiliser. Guildford: IPC Science and Technology Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Nǒmmik, H. (1973). The effect of pellet size on the ammonia loss from urea applied to forest soil. Plant and Soil 39, 309–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, F. V., Penny, A. & Flint, R. C. (1972a). Results from an experiment comparing aqueous ammonia with ‘Nitro-Chalk’ for grazed grass. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 79, 341–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, F. V., Penny, A. & Flint, R. C. (1972b). Results from barley experiments comparing aqueous ammonia and aqueous urea with ammonium nitrate, and also liquid with granular NPK fertilisers. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 79, 349–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, F. V., Penny, A. & Flint, R. C. (1973). Results from experiments comparing aqueous and anhydrous ammonia with ‘Nitro-Chalk’ for grass cut for silage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 81, 465–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, F. V., Penny, A. & Williams, R. J. B. (1965). Experiments comparing concentrated and dilute NPK fertilisers and four nitrogen fertilisers on a range of crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 65, 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar