Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-10T05:09:52.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the adaptability of three breeds of sheep to a tropical environment modified by altitude IV. Role of the fleece in thermoregulation in German Merino ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. B. Symington
R. B. Symington
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College of Rhodesia and Nyasaland, Salisbury
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The influence of fleece on thermoregulation in German Merino ewes was investigated in Rhodesia. Comparative heat tolerances of Persian Blackhead, indigenous Native and shorn and unshorn Merino ewes were obtained during the hottest month of the year in Northern Rhodesia. The main thermolytic responses in unshorn, partially shorn and completely shorn Merino ewes were measured at 7.0 a.m.; 10.0 a.m.; 1.0 p.m. and 4.0 p.m. during April in Southern Rhodesia.

1. Unshorn Merino ewes showed more and shorn Merino ewes less effective body temperature regulation than Persian or Native ewes. High heat tolerance in unshorn Merinos was due primarily to insulation by the fleece and not to more efficient physiological thermolysis than in hair breeds. No ewe showed signs of undue thermal stress and feed intake was not affected by heat.

2. Increases in rectal temperature and respiratory rate between 7.0 a.m. and 1.0 p.m. of Merinos in Southern Rhodesia were related inversely to fleece length. Body temperature did not differ significantly at 1.0 p.m. owing to differential rates of increase in respiratory rate.

3. Magnitude of the diurnal fluctuation in skin temperature was also related inversely to fleece length. Partially shorn ewes, however, began with and maintained highest skin temperature through the heat of the day. In all groups skin temperature fell after 10.0 a.m. although ambient temperature continued to rise. This fall could not be attributed to sweating since moisture secretion declined simultaneously.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , December 1960 , pp. 311 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blaxter, K. L. (1948). J. Agric. Sci. 38, 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Graham, N. McC. & Wainman, F. W. (1959). J. Agric. Sci. 52, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. & Quin, J. I. (1947). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. 21, 317.Google Scholar
Dutt, R. H., Ellington, E. F. & Carlton, W. W. (1956). J. Anim. Sci. 15, 1287.Google Scholar
Dutt, R. H. & Hamm, P. (1957). J. Anim. Sci. 16, 182.Google Scholar
Elder, J. S. (1941). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. 17, 141.Google Scholar
Findlay, J. D. (1950). Bull. Hannah Dairy Inst. no. 9.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J. L. & Reid, G. R. (1953). J. Anim. Sci. 12, 666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulet, C. V., El Sheikh, A. S., Pope, A. L. & Casida, L. E. (1956). J. Anim. Sci. 15, 617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, K. J. (1957). J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 23, 238.Google Scholar
Lee, D. H. K. (1950). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1, 200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacFarlane, W. V., Morris, R. J. & Howard, R. (1956). Nature, Lond., 178, 304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacFarlane, W. V., Morris, R. J. & Howard, B. (1958). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 9, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priestley, C. H. B. (1957). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 8, 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, K. W. & Lee, D. H. K. (1947). J. Anim. Sci. 6, 182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symington, R. B. (1960 a). J. Agric. Sci. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Symington, R. B. (1960 b). J. Agric. Sci. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Wodzicka, M. (1958). N.Z. J. Agric. Res. 1, 582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar