Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T08:47:56.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies on the relationship between nutrition and wool production of merino sheep. I. The technique employed for determining the utilisation of foodstuffs and for estimating the wool produced over short periods by Merino sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Hedley R. Marston
Affiliation:
(From the Laboratory of the Division of Animal Nutrition of the Commonwealth Council for Scientific and Industrial Research at the University of Adelaide, South Australia.)

Extract

Feeding stalls of the Lehmann type, which are generally employed when sheep are used for digestibility trials, are useful if wethers act as experimental animals. The wether, however, is not an ideal subject for investigations in which it is desired to estimate the utilisation of individual nutriments, for the portion of the ration which is retained usually constitutes but a small part of that ingested and, in consequence, when attempts are made to draw up a true balance considerable errors are often encountered through the difficulty of ascertaining the total volume of urine excreted during the feeding period. This uncertainty may be overcome, for if the ewe is used a catheter may be passed into the bladder and the urine completely drained at the will of the experimenter.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Barker, S. G. and Marsh, M. C.Wool. Rec. (1928).Google Scholar
(2)Bulliard, H.Ann. Derm. Syph., Paris (1923), Sér. 6, 4, 386.Google Scholar
(3)Fraser-Roberts, J. A.J. Text. Insl., Manchr. (1930), 21, 127 T.Google Scholar
(4)Lines, E. W. and Peirce, A.Bull. Counc. sci. industr. Res. Austr. (1931), No. 55.Google Scholar
(5)Marston, H. R. and Peirce, A. W.Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci. (1932), 10, 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Strangeways, D. H.J. agric. Sci. (1933), 23, 359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Trotter, M.Amer. J. phys. Anthrop. (1924), 7, 427; Anat. Rec. (1928), 37, 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar