Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T12:18:12.954Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The utilization of maize silage for intensive beef production: II. The effect of urea on silage fermentation and on the voluntary intake and performance of young cattle fed maize silage-based diets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

C. Thomas ,
R. F. Wilson ,
R. J. Wilkins  and
J. M. Wilkinson
C. Thomas
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berks, SL6 5LR
R. F. Wilson
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berks, SL6 5LR
R. J. Wilkins
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berks, SL6 5LR
J. M. Wilkinson
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berks, SL6 5LR
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Maize was cut at 22·6, 27·0 and 41·6% dry matter and ensiled in 4 kg quantities in polythene bags without additive or after the addition of urea at 0·5, 1·0, 1·5 and 2·0% of the crop dry-matter content. Silos were opened at intervals up to 96 days. Maize of 23·4% dry-matter content was ensiled in 10 t butyl rubber silos without additive or after the addition of urea at 1·0% or fishmeal at 4·0% of the crop dry-matter content.

Silages from the polythene bag silos were all well preserved. pH values increased and total acid content fell with increasing maturity of the crop. Addition of urea had little effect on these values. Only with the most mature crop did ammonia content increase markedly with increasing level of urea addition. All silages from the butyl rubber silos were well preserved with low pH values and similar total acid contents.

Silages from the butyl rubber silos were used to measure voluntary, intake live-weight gain and efficiency of utilization of young beef cattle. The diets fed were silage without nitrogen supplement or supplemented with urea or fishmeal, added at ensiling, at feeding or included in a concentrate feed. One third of the total dry-matter intake of all cattle was provided by a pelleted concentrate feed consisting of equal quantities of dried grass and rolled barley.

The increase in nitrogen content brought about by the addition of urea or fishmeal did not affect total dry-matter or organic-matter intake but was associated with 25% increase in nitrogen consumed. Live-weight gain on all treatments with added nitrogen was 20% higher than for the unsupplemented silage. This improvement in growth rate was accompanied by significant increases in efficiency of utilization of dietary dry matter and organic matter but efficiency of nitrogen utilization was reduced. The results indicate that neither the source nor site of addition of supplementary nitrogen significantly affect live-weight gain, dry-matter intake, organic-matter intake or utilization of dry matter or organic matter. They also demonstrate that urea can be used effectively to provide supplementary nitrogen to young cattle fed a maize silage-based ration.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 84 , Issue 2 , April 1975 , pp. 365 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1965). Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, 10th ed.Washington.Google Scholar
Conrad, H. R., Hibbs, J. W. & Staubus, J. R. (1969). Guidelines for increasing urea utilization in rations for dairy cows. Ohio Agricultural Experimental Station Research Bulletin, p. 1018.Google Scholar
Conway, E. J. (1957). Microdiffusion Analysis and Volumetric Error. London: Crosby Lockwood and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Crampton, E. W. & Maynard, L. A. (1938). The relation of cellulose and lignin content to the nutritive value of animal feeds. Journal of Nutrition 15, 383–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demarquilly, C., Haurez, Ph., Journet, M., Lelong, C. & Malterre, C. (1971). Le mais plante entière: composition, valeur alimentaire, utilization par les bovins. Bulletin Technique d'Information, no. 264–5, 1001–18.Google Scholar
Dewar, W. A. & McDonald, P. (1961). Determination of dry matter in silage by distillation with toluene. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 12, 790–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsden, S. R. & Gibson, Q. H. (1954). The estimation of lactic acid using cerie sulphate. Biochemical Journal 58, 154–8.Google Scholar
Henderson, H. E. & Purser, D. N. (1969). Anhydrous ammonia, urea and mineral additions to corn silage. Beef Research. Michigan State University Report, no. AH–BC–684A.Google Scholar
Huber, J. T., Thomas, J. W. & Emery, R. S. (1968). Response of lactating cows fed urea-treated corn silage harvested at various stages of maturity. Journal of Dairy Science 51, 1806–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. R. & McClure, K. E. (1968). Corn plant maturity. 4. Effects on digestibility of corn silage in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 27, 535–40.Google Scholar
Lassiter, C. A. (1967). The use of corn silage and urea in dairy rations. Proceedings of the Distillers Feed Research Council Conference 22, 64.Google Scholar
Lopez, J., Jorgensen, N. A., Niedermeir, R. P. & Larsen, H. J. (1970). Effect of N source, stage of maturity and fermentation time on pH and organic acid production in corn silage. Journal of Dairy Science 63, 1225–32.Google Scholar
McClure, W. H., Fontenot, J. P. & Carter, R. C. (1972). Urea treated corn silage and protein supplementation for fattening steer calves. Journal of Animal Science 34, 361, abstract.Google Scholar
McDonald, P., Henderson, A. R. & Whittenbury, R. (1966). The effect of temperature on ensilage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 17, 476–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mischustin, E. N. (1969). Influence of urea on microbiological processes and the nitrogen content of silages. Proceedings of the Third General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation, pp. 161–72.Google Scholar
Perry, T. W., Beeson, W. M. & Mohler, M. T. (1967). A comparison of high urea supplements with natural protein supplements for young and fattening beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 26, 1434–7.Google Scholar
Smith, D., Paulsen, G. M. & Raguse, C. A. (1964). Extraction of total available carbohydrates from grass and legume tissue. Plant Physiology, Lancaster 39, 960–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H. (1960). Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Thomas, C., Wilkinson, J. M. & Tayler, J. C. (1975). The utilization of maize silage for intensive beef production. 1. The effect of level and source of supplementary nitrogen on the utilization of maize silage by cattle of different ages. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge (in the press).Google Scholar
Thomson, A. J. & Rogers, H. H. (1968). Yield and quality components in maize grown for silage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 71, 393–403.Google Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. & Terry, R. A. (1963). A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 101–11.Google Scholar
Weinmann, H. (1947). Determination of total available carbohydrate in plants. Plant Physiology, Lancaster 22, 279–90.Google Scholar
Whittenbury, R., McDonald, P. & Bryan-Jones, D. G. (1967). A short review of some biochemical and microbiological aspects of ensilage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 18, 441–44.Google Scholar
Wieringa, G. W. (1958). The effects of wilting on butyric acid fermentation in silage. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 6, 204–10.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. F. & Wilkins, R. J. (1972). An evaluation of laboratory ensiling techniques. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 23, 377–85.Google Scholar
Wiseman, H. G. & Irvin, H. N. (1957). The determination of organic acids in silage. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 5, 213–15.Google Scholar