Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:33:16.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An accurate wet-combustion method for the determination of carbon in soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Pauline Alper
Pauline Alper
Affiliation:
Research Assistant in Soils, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Pretoria, Transvaal, South Africa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Inaccurate results previously obtained with wet-combustion methods for the determination of carbon in soils have probably been due to: (a) incomplete oxidation of carbon; (b) incomplete absorption of carbon dioxide. The method described herein ensures complete oxidation and complete absorption. The oxidizing agent employed consists of a mixture of sulphuric acid and potassium bichromate; the absorption takes place in a closed system.

2. When highly accurate results are required, a combustion tube is a necessary adjunct to the wet-combustion method, as appreciable amounts of carbon escape complete oxidation in reaction flask.

3. The soil should be moistened with water before adding the oxidizing mixture, to avoid the formation of complexes, which may protect part of the carbon from oxidation by the acid.

4. Within limits, the concentrations of sulphuric acid and potassium bichromate do not affect the results.

5. While it is necessary to use catalysts (selenium and potassium sulphate) for the complete oxidation of the resistant carbon of coal, catalysts were found to be unnecessary for the determination of carbon in soils.

6. For soils rich in chloride, it is necessary to absorb the chlorine evolved by means of sodium bisulphite solution.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , April 1938 , pp. 187 - 196
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ames, & Gaither, (1914). J. industr. Engng Chem. 6, 561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bal, (1925). J. agric. Sci. 15, 454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, & Muller, (1906). J. chem. Soc. 89, 595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, , McLean, & Rice, Williams (1929). J. agric. Sci. 19, 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schollenberger, (1927). Soil Sci. 24, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schollenberger, (1928). J. industr. Engng Chem. 20, 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walkley, (1935). J. agric. Sci. 25, 598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warington, & Peake, (1880). J. chem. Soc. 37, 617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar