Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T09:56:30.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A chemical study of the development of the wheat grain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Herbert Ernest Woodman  and
F. L. Engledow
Herbert Ernest Woodman
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition and Plant Breeding, School of Agriculture, Cambridge University.
F. L. Engledow
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition and Plant Breeding, School of Agriculture, Cambridge University.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The connection which has been shown to exist between the strength of wheat flour and the chemical individuality of the glutenine fraction of the wheat protein (Woodman, 1922) (1) led the writers to institute an enquiry into the manner in which the individual wheat proteins are developed and stored during the progress of the grain from the early stages after flowering to ripeness. The immediate object of the investigation was to secure information in regard to the stages at which the different proteins made their appearance in the grain and to determine at what point the character of the grain contents was such as to enable a tenacious gluten to be obtained by grinding up the kernels with successive quantities of dilute NaCl solution. It was also intended to follow the rate of alteration of the amounts of the several proteins during the growth of the grain and to attempt to elucidate as far as possible the relationships which exist between the simple and complex forms of nitrogen at the various stages.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , October 1924 , pp. 563 - 586
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1924

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Woodman, H. E. (1922). J. Agric. Sci. 12, 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Brenchley, and Hall, (1908–1910). J. Agric. Sci. 3, 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Thatcher, (1915). J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 7, 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Osborne, (1907). The Proteins of the Wheat Kernel. Washington.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Schulze, (1904). Ztschr. physiol. Chem. 41, 455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Richardson, and Crampton, (1886). Ber. d. deutsch. chem. Ges. 19, 1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Frankfurt, (1896). Landw. Vers.-stat. 47, 456.Google Scholar
(8)Blish, (1918). J. Biol. Chem. 33, 551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Jodidi, and Markley, (1923). J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 45, 2137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Engledow, and Wadham, (1923). J. Agric. Sci. 13, 390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Engledow, and Wadham, (1924). J. Agric. Sci. 14, 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Brenchley, (1909). Ann. of Botany, 23, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Percival, (1921). The Wheat Plant. A Monograph. London.Google Scholar
(13)Foreman, (1920). Bioch. J. 14, 451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(14)Bailey, and Blish, (1915). J. Biol. Chem. 23, 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(15)Eckerson, (1917). Bull. 139, Washington Agric. Exp. Sta., Division of Botany.Google Scholar
(16)André, (1905). Compt. Rend. 140, 1417.Google Scholar
(16)André, (1912). Compt. Rend. 154, 1627.Google Scholar
(17)Borodin, (1878). Bot. Zeitung, 36, 802.Google Scholar
(18)Schulze, (1880). Landw. Jahrb. 9, 689.Google Scholar
(19)Butkewitsch, (1908). Bioch. Ztschr. 12, 314.Google Scholar
(20)Mercadente, (1875). Ber. d. deutsch. Ges. 8, 823.Google Scholar
(21)Schulze, (1878). Landw. Jahrb. 7, 411.Google Scholar
(22)Prianischnikoff, and Schulow, (1910). Ber. bot. Ges. 28, 253.Google Scholar
(23)Prianischnrkoff, (1922). Landw. Vers.-stat. 99, 267.Google Scholar
(24)Chibnall, (1924). Bioch. J. 18, 395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(25)Chibnall, (1924). Bioch. J. 18, 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(26)Schulze, (1911). Ztschr. physiol. Chem. 71, 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(27)Liebig, (1844). Liebig's Ann. 51, 287.Google Scholar
(28)Delbrück, (1917). Lusk's Science of Nutrition, p. 285. (Philadelphia and London.)Google Scholar
(29)Erlenmeyer, and Kunlin, (1902). Ber. d. deutsch. Ges. 35, 2438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(30)Engel, (1887). Compt. Rend. 104, 1805.Google Scholar
(30)Engel, (1885). Compt. Rend. 106, 1677.Google Scholar
(31)Fischer, and Raske, (1905). Ber. d. deutsch. Ges. 38, 3607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(32)Nedokctschajew, (1902). Landw. Vers.-stat. 56, 303.Google Scholar
(32)Nedokctschajew, (1903). Landw. Vers.-stat. 58, 275.Google Scholar
(33)Spitzer, , Carr, and Epple, (1919). J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 141, 1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar