Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T13:35:53.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of sulphur-coated urea and ammonium sulphate amended with N-Serve as sources of nitrogen for sugarcane

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. C. Dalal  and
M. Prasad
R. C. Dalal
Affiliation:
University of the West Indies, St Augustine, and Caroni Research Station, Carapichaima, Trinidad, West Indies
M. Prasad
Affiliation:
University of the West Indies, St Augustine, and Caroni Research Station, Carapichaima, Trinidad, West Indies
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A comparison of ammonium sulphate (AS) with and without N-Serve and sulphurcoated urea (SCU) as N sources for sugarcane, studied in a pot experiment, showed that although the tillering, the leaf N concentration and cane yield were increased by adding fertilizer N there were no significant differences between N sources. However, AS and AS + N-Serve depressed the soil pH, especially that of acidic soils, much more than SCU. In a field experiment where AS, urea and SCU were compared on a calcareous soil, it was observed that urea gave significantly lower cane and sucrose yields than AS and SCU when N was applied on the surface, possibly due to greater volatiliization losses from urea. Subsurface application increased the efficiency of urea, although the method of placement had no significant effect on the N efficiency of AS and SCU. AS was as effective as SCU. Thus the coating of urea by sulphur increased its efficiency for sugarcane only when applied on the surface of a calcareous soil.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 85 , Issue 3 , December 1975 , pp. 427 - 433
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, S. E., Mays, D. A. & Terman, G. L. (1968). Sulfur-coated urea: an effective slow-release nitrogen fertilizer. Crops and Soils 21, 13–15.Google Scholar
Bingham, F. T., Chapman, H. D. & Pugh, A. L. (1954). Solution-culture studies of nitrite toxieity to plants. Proceedings Soil Science Society of America 18, 305–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremner, J. M. (1965). Methods of Soil Analysis. Monograph No. 9 (ed. Black, C. A.), Part 2. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Brown, C. B. & Bally, G. S. (1970). Soils of Central Trinidad. Govt. Printery, Trinidad and Tobago.Google Scholar
Bryne, E. (1968). Methods of Soil Analysis. Soil Division, Wexford, Ireland.Google Scholar
Court, M. N., Stephen, R. C. & Waid, J. S. (1962). Nitrite toxieity arising from the use of urea as a fertilizer. Nature 194, 1263–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalal, R. C. (1974). Comparative efficiency of soluble and controlled release (sulfur-coated urea) nitrogen for corn in tropics. Proceedings Soil Science Society of America 38, 970–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husz, G. (1966). Die Wirkung verschiedener Stickstoffdungemittel auf Qualitat und Quantitat von Zuckerrohr im Nord-Peru. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung, Düngung und Bodenkunde 112, 133–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1958). Soil Chemical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Lojo, A. R., Covar, R. R. & Mora, C. R. (1964). Preliminary studies on the use of N-Serve in the conservation of nitrogen in soils. Sugar News 40, 554–60.Google Scholar
Lunt, O. R. (1968). Modified sulfur coated granular urea for controlled nutrient release. Transactions of the 9th International Congress of Soil Science, Adelaide, III, 377–83.Google Scholar
Mays, D. A. (1970). Sulphur-coated urea: a slowrelease nitrogen source for grass. Proceedings of the 11th International Grassland Congress, Queensland, pp. 428–30.Google Scholar
Rindt, D. W., Blouin, G. M. & Getsinger, J. G. (1968). Sulfur-coating on nitrogen fertilizers to reduce dissolution rate. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry 16, 773–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, G. (1966). Sugarcane fertilizer research at the Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Puerto Rico, 1955–1965. The Sugar Journal 29, 24–29.Google Scholar
Sanchez, P. A., Gavidia, O. A., Ramirez, G. E., Vergara, R. & Minguillo, F. (1973). Performance of sulfur-coated urea under intermittently flooded rice culture in Peru. Proceedings Soil Science Society of America 37, 789–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shand, C. & Ahmad, N. (1974). Effect of nitrate inhibition and slow release nitrogen fertilizers on nitrification rates in some Trinidad soils. Tropical Agriculture 51, 167–78.Google Scholar
Turner, G. O. & Goring, C.A.I. (1966) N-Sorve: A status report. Down to Earth 22, 19–25.Google Scholar