Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T12:59:39.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The control of ovulation in the mare with reference to insemination with stored sperm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

W. F. Davison
W. F. Davison
Affiliation:
Bloodstock Research Fellow, Veterinary Educational Trust, School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. In pony mares during oestrus in which a follicle was considered to be sufficiently ripe (thin walled) the intravenous injection of 500 i.u. pregnancy urine extract induced ovulation in nineteen out of twenty-three mares between 24 and 48 hr., in three cases within 24 hr., and in one case between the fourth and fifth days.

2. Dialysed egg yolk as a medium for storage of horse sperm for 24 hr. was shown to give satisfactory results when ovulation is controlled by the above method, so that it occurs within 24 hr. after insemination. Nine single inseminations during one oestrus resulted in five pregnancies.

3. The number of spermatozoa required for successful inseminations is discussed.

4. Means of detecting a sufficiently ripe follicle before injection with pregnancy urine extract are described.

5. It is shown that the duration of oestrus is shortened as the result of pregnancy urine injections.

6. Data is given concerning the time which elapses between ovulation and the cessation of oestrus.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , October 1947 , pp. 287 - 290
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berliner, V. R. (1945). Abstr. of address before 25th An. Gen. Meet. Horse and Mule Assoc. of Amer. Inc.Google Scholar
Caslick, C. A. (1937). Cornell Vet. 27, 189.Google Scholar
Chang, M. C. (1942). J. Agric. Sci. 33, 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, F. T. (1939). J. Agric. Sci. 29, 459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, F. T. (1940 a). J. Agric. Sci. 30, 244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, F. T. (1940 b). Vet. Rec. 52, 597.Google Scholar
Laing, J. A. (1942). J. Agric. Sci. 33, 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mckenzie, F. F., Lasley, J. F. & Phillips, R. W. (1939). Proc. Amer. Soc. Anirn. Prod. p. 222.Google Scholar
Mckenzie, F. F. (1940). Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 98.Google Scholar
Mirskaya, L. R. & Petbopavlovskii, V. (1937). Probl. Zwotn, no. 4, p. 22. Abstr. in Anim. Breed. Abstr. 5, 387.Google Scholar
Tosic, & Walton, A. (1945). Nature, Lond., 156, 507.Google Scholar
Walton, A. (1938). Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 238.Google Scholar
Walton, A. (1942). Notes on Artificial Insemination of Sheep, Cattle and Horses, 3rd ed. London: Holborn Instrument Co.Google Scholar